Danish Students’ Understanding of Fractions: A Replication Study

Julie Vangsøe Færch, Jeremy Hodgen
{"title":"Danish Students’ Understanding of Fractions: A Replication Study","authors":"Julie Vangsøe Færch, Jeremy Hodgen","doi":"10.1163/26670127-bja10014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we report on a conceptual replication of a fractions test originally administered in the 1970s in England as part of the ‘Concepts in Secondary Mathematics and Science’ ( CSMS ) research programme documenting lower secondary students’ understanding of mathematics. We present data from a recent study conducted in Denmark with 336 students aged between 12 and 14 years, presenting descriptive results as in the original research. In addition, we use Rasch modelling — a technique that was not widely used in the 1970s — to further analyse the students’ understanding of fractions and to validate the test. Our findings indicate that Danish students’ fractional understanding in word or diagrammatic contexts is slightly stronger in comparison to that of the English students in the original study, whereas the case for computations involving fractions is the reverse. We discuss the possible reasons for these differences. Our study provides evidence that fractional knowledge involves a number of components and suggest ways in which the test might be improved. The Impact Sheet to this article can be accessed at 10.6084/m9.figshare.24219673","PeriodicalId":474616,"journal":{"name":"Implementation and replication studies in mathematics education","volume":" 44","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation and replication studies in mathematics education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we report on a conceptual replication of a fractions test originally administered in the 1970s in England as part of the ‘Concepts in Secondary Mathematics and Science’ ( CSMS ) research programme documenting lower secondary students’ understanding of mathematics. We present data from a recent study conducted in Denmark with 336 students aged between 12 and 14 years, presenting descriptive results as in the original research. In addition, we use Rasch modelling — a technique that was not widely used in the 1970s — to further analyse the students’ understanding of fractions and to validate the test. Our findings indicate that Danish students’ fractional understanding in word or diagrammatic contexts is slightly stronger in comparison to that of the English students in the original study, whereas the case for computations involving fractions is the reverse. We discuss the possible reasons for these differences. Our study provides evidence that fractional knowledge involves a number of components and suggest ways in which the test might be improved. The Impact Sheet to this article can be accessed at 10.6084/m9.figshare.24219673
丹麦学生对分数的理解:一项重复研究
摘要在本文中,我们报告了一项分数测试的概念复制,该测试最初是在20世纪70年代在英国进行的,作为“中学数学和科学概念”(csm)研究计划的一部分,记录了中学生对数学的理解。我们提供了最近在丹麦进行的一项研究的数据,其中有336名年龄在12至14岁之间的学生,呈现了原始研究中的描述性结果。此外,我们使用了Rasch模型——一种在20世纪70年代没有广泛使用的技术——来进一步分析学生对分数的理解并验证测试。我们的研究结果表明,与原始研究中的英国学生相比,丹麦学生对单词或图表上下文的分数理解略强,而涉及分数计算的情况则相反。我们将讨论造成这些差异的可能原因。我们的研究提供了证据,证明分数知识涉及许多组成部分,并提出了改进测试的方法。本文的影响表可以在10.6084/m9.figshare.24219673访问
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信