Evaluation of the foundation block of first year MBBS curriculum in a medical college

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Venkappa S. Mantur, Sudarshan Reddy C., Arun Kumar, Arun Kowale
{"title":"Evaluation of the foundation block of first year MBBS curriculum in a medical college","authors":"Venkappa S. Mantur, Sudarshan Reddy C., Arun Kumar, Arun Kowale","doi":"10.51248/.v43i5.2981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Aim: The National Medical Council of India (NMC) has updated the undergraduate medical curriculum by establishing \"competency based medical education,\" which focuses on a one-month foundation course. This time is thought to be crucial for students to adjust to their new college surroundings. The purpose of this study was to assess the initial one-month foundation course from the perspectives of students. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 first year MBBS students joining the college in the academic year 2020-21 were included in the study. Therefore, all students’ means universal samples were included in the study. The core curriculum was meticulously organised and carried out in accordance with the National Medical Council of India's recommendations. Students provided feedback using a five-point Likert scale. Before the final study, we conducted a pilot study for assessment of the reliability of the scale by taking convenient samples and reliability coefficient was found to be 0.8769. Overall recommendations were solicited, and the outcomes were analysed using feedback from students. It calculated the percentage of students who responded. The data were analysed by using statistical software i.e., SPSS version 20.00 with simple frequency and percentages. Results: The percentages of students who agreed and strongly agreed on something ranged from 77.14 to 90.92 percent. All the sessions are positive feedback given by students who strongly agree and biosafety, E-learning, language, and biomedical waste management needed improvement in the module. Good collaboration, teamwork, and thorough planning at the interdepartmental and intradepartmental levels, according to the faculty, were vital elements for the course's successful implementation. Conclusion: The foundation course sessions were generally well welcomed by the students. The findings will aid us in improving our foundation programme for the following year to accomplish the goals of the foundation course.","PeriodicalId":35655,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine (India)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine (India)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i5.2981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: The National Medical Council of India (NMC) has updated the undergraduate medical curriculum by establishing "competency based medical education," which focuses on a one-month foundation course. This time is thought to be crucial for students to adjust to their new college surroundings. The purpose of this study was to assess the initial one-month foundation course from the perspectives of students. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 first year MBBS students joining the college in the academic year 2020-21 were included in the study. Therefore, all students’ means universal samples were included in the study. The core curriculum was meticulously organised and carried out in accordance with the National Medical Council of India's recommendations. Students provided feedback using a five-point Likert scale. Before the final study, we conducted a pilot study for assessment of the reliability of the scale by taking convenient samples and reliability coefficient was found to be 0.8769. Overall recommendations were solicited, and the outcomes were analysed using feedback from students. It calculated the percentage of students who responded. The data were analysed by using statistical software i.e., SPSS version 20.00 with simple frequency and percentages. Results: The percentages of students who agreed and strongly agreed on something ranged from 77.14 to 90.92 percent. All the sessions are positive feedback given by students who strongly agree and biosafety, E-learning, language, and biomedical waste management needed improvement in the module. Good collaboration, teamwork, and thorough planning at the interdepartmental and intradepartmental levels, according to the faculty, were vital elements for the course's successful implementation. Conclusion: The foundation course sessions were generally well welcomed by the students. The findings will aid us in improving our foundation programme for the following year to accomplish the goals of the foundation course.
某医学院MBBS一年级基础课程的评价
简介和目标:印度国家医学委员会(NMC)通过建立“以能力为基础的医学教育”更新了本科医学课程,该教育侧重于一个月的基础课程。这段时间被认为是学生适应新的大学环境的关键时期。本研究的目的是要从学生的角度来评估最初一个月的基础课程。材料与方法:研究对象为2020-21学年入学的150名MBBS一年级学生。因此,所有学生的均值普遍样本都被纳入研究。核心课程是按照印度国家医学委员会的建议精心组织和实施的。学生们使用李克特五点量表提供反馈。在最终研究之前,我们采用方便样本的方法对量表的信度进行了初步研究,信度系数为0.8769。我们征求了总体建议,并根据学生的反馈对结果进行了分析。它计算了回答的学生的百分比。数据分析采用SPSS 20.00版统计软件,采用简单的频率和百分比。结果:同意和强烈同意的学生比例从77.14%到90.92%不等。所有课程都得到了学生的积极反馈,他们强烈同意该模块需要改进生物安全、电子学习、语言和生物医学废物管理。根据教师的说法,良好的合作、团队合作以及部门间和部门内部的周密规划是课程成功实施的关键因素。结论:基础课程普遍受到学生的欢迎。调查结果将有助于我们改善我们的基础课程,为下一年实现基础课程的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedicine (India)
Biomedicine (India) Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信