Health Economic Analysis of Two-Layer Bandage System for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Peter Mallow
{"title":"Health Economic Analysis of Two-Layer Bandage System for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency","authors":"Peter Mallow","doi":"10.36469/jheor.2023.82159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Compression therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Two-layer bandage (2LB) systems have been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. Objective: To estimate the total cost per response (CPR) for the resolution of edema and wounds in patients with CVI treated with a 2LB system as part of their overall wound healing regimen. Methods: A probabilistic decision tree model was developed to estimate the incremental CPR for a 2LB system. The model simulated 10 000 patients to estimate the CPR for the resolution of edema and wound healing. The analysis was performed using clinical data from a published single-arm, multicenter prospective study of CVI indicated for compression therapy. The response outcomes of interest were resolution of edema and rate of wound healing. The follow-up time was a maximum of 6 weeks, and the perspective of the study was a US outpatient treatment center. Economic data for compression therapy were based on the public prices of a 2LB system. Dressing changes occurred per manufacturer instructions for use. Results: The study comprised 702 patients (56% female), with a total of 414 wounds. The median duration of the wounds was 42 days, and the median size at the initial visit was 3.5 cm2. The average pain reduction fell by 67% using a visual analog score. Bandages were typically changed once or twice a week (51.7%). Wound healing occurred in 128 of the 414 wounds (30.9%). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the resolution of edema was $65.67 (range, $16.67-$124.32). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the healing of a wound was $138.71 (range, $35.71-$273.53). Conclusion: This economic evaluation complements previous clinical effectiveness and safety studies of 2LB systems for the treatment of CVI. The results demonstrate that the costs of incorporating 2LB into standard wound-healing protocols are negligible compared with overall treatment costs. Two-layer bandages may be considered a cost-effective first-line system for the treatment of wounds caused by CVI.","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2023.82159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compression therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). Two-layer bandage (2LB) systems have been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. Objective: To estimate the total cost per response (CPR) for the resolution of edema and wounds in patients with CVI treated with a 2LB system as part of their overall wound healing regimen. Methods: A probabilistic decision tree model was developed to estimate the incremental CPR for a 2LB system. The model simulated 10 000 patients to estimate the CPR for the resolution of edema and wound healing. The analysis was performed using clinical data from a published single-arm, multicenter prospective study of CVI indicated for compression therapy. The response outcomes of interest were resolution of edema and rate of wound healing. The follow-up time was a maximum of 6 weeks, and the perspective of the study was a US outpatient treatment center. Economic data for compression therapy were based on the public prices of a 2LB system. Dressing changes occurred per manufacturer instructions for use. Results: The study comprised 702 patients (56% female), with a total of 414 wounds. The median duration of the wounds was 42 days, and the median size at the initial visit was 3.5 cm2. The average pain reduction fell by 67% using a visual analog score. Bandages were typically changed once or twice a week (51.7%). Wound healing occurred in 128 of the 414 wounds (30.9%). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the resolution of edema was $65.67 (range, $16.67-$124.32). The expected incremental CPR of a 2LB system for the healing of a wound was $138.71 (range, $35.71-$273.53). Conclusion: This economic evaluation complements previous clinical effectiveness and safety studies of 2LB systems for the treatment of CVI. The results demonstrate that the costs of incorporating 2LB into standard wound-healing protocols are negligible compared with overall treatment costs. Two-layer bandages may be considered a cost-effective first-line system for the treatment of wounds caused by CVI.
双层绷带系统治疗慢性静脉功能不全的卫生经济学分析
背景:压迫疗法是治疗慢性静脉功能不全(CVI)的金标准。双层绷带(2LB)系统已被证明是一种安全有效的治疗选择。目的:评估2LB系统作为CVI患者整体伤口愈合方案的一部分治疗水肿和伤口的每次缓解总成本(CPR)。方法:采用概率决策树模型估计2LB系统的增量CPR。该模型模拟了1万例患者,以估计心肺复苏术对水肿和伤口愈合的解决效果。该分析是根据一项已发表的单臂、多中心前瞻性CVI临床数据进行的,该研究表明CVI需要进行压迫治疗。我们感兴趣的反应结果是水肿的消退和伤口愈合的速度。随访时间最长为6周,研究视角为美国门诊治疗中心。压缩疗法的经济数据基于2LB系统的公开价格。根据制造商的使用说明进行敷料更换。结果:本研究纳入702例患者(56%为女性),共414处伤口。伤口的中位持续时间为42天,初次就诊时的中位面积为3.5平方厘米。使用视觉模拟评分,疼痛平均减轻了67%。通常每周更换1 - 2次绷带(51.7%)。414例创面中有128例创面愈合(30.9%)。2LB系统解决水肿的预期增量CPR费用为65.67美元(范围16.67- 124.32美元)。2LB系统对伤口愈合的预期增量CPR为138.71美元(范围35.71- 273.53美元)。结论:这项经济评估补充了之前2LB系统治疗CVI的临床有效性和安全性研究。结果表明,与总体治疗成本相比,将2LB纳入标准伤口愈合方案的成本可以忽略不计。双层绷带可能被认为是治疗CVI引起的伤口的一种具有成本效益的一线系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信