Interface skin pressures on four pressure-relieving devices.

Journal of enterostomal therapy Pub Date : 1990-07-01
C Counsell, S Seymour, P Guin, A Hudson
{"title":"Interface skin pressures on four pressure-relieving devices.","authors":"C Counsell,&nbsp;S Seymour,&nbsp;P Guin,&nbsp;A Hudson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurses employed in acute care hospitals frequently encounter patients who require a pressure-relieving device. It is often difficult for nurses to decide which support surface should be used to best meet a patient's need for a pressure-reducing device because of the multiplicity of products available. One of the variables studied was found not to statistically influence the effectiveness of the various pressure-relieving devices. Body build is not a consideration when determining which support surface is effective in a healthy population of subjects. The two air-flotation low air-loss beds would be defined as effective pressure-relieving devices. The interface pressure readings vary from individual to individual on various bony prominences. The population studied was that of healthy volunteers. Healthy subjects have an increased fat pad in their sacral area compared with the critically ill patient. The heel had the highest interface pressure of the five that were studied. This is a bony prominence that requires additional attention if skin integrity is to be maintained.</p>","PeriodicalId":77553,"journal":{"name":"Journal of enterostomal therapy","volume":"17 4","pages":"150-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of enterostomal therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nurses employed in acute care hospitals frequently encounter patients who require a pressure-relieving device. It is often difficult for nurses to decide which support surface should be used to best meet a patient's need for a pressure-reducing device because of the multiplicity of products available. One of the variables studied was found not to statistically influence the effectiveness of the various pressure-relieving devices. Body build is not a consideration when determining which support surface is effective in a healthy population of subjects. The two air-flotation low air-loss beds would be defined as effective pressure-relieving devices. The interface pressure readings vary from individual to individual on various bony prominences. The population studied was that of healthy volunteers. Healthy subjects have an increased fat pad in their sacral area compared with the critically ill patient. The heel had the highest interface pressure of the five that were studied. This is a bony prominence that requires additional attention if skin integrity is to be maintained.

四个减压装置的界面蒙皮压力。
急症护理医院的护士经常遇到需要减压装置的病人。由于产品的多样性,护士通常很难决定应该使用哪种支撑表面来最好地满足患者对减压装置的需求。研究发现,其中一个变量在统计上不会影响各种减压装置的有效性。在确定哪种支撑面对健康人群有效时,体型不是考虑因素。两个气浮低耗气层是有效的泄压装置。不同骨突上的界面压力读数因人而异。研究对象为健康志愿者。健康受试者与危重患者相比,其骶区脂肪垫增加。脚后跟的界面压力是研究中五个关节中最高的。这是一个骨骼突出,需要额外的注意,如果要保持皮肤的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信