Services and interventions for people who are homeless with companion animals (pets): a systematic review

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Laura K. McCosker, Annick Maujean, Natalie Hill, Martin J. Downes
{"title":"Services and interventions for people who are homeless with companion animals (pets): a systematic review","authors":"Laura K. McCosker, Annick Maujean, Natalie Hill, Martin J. Downes","doi":"10.1080/10530789.2023.2205188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many people who are homeless own a companion animal (a “pet”). For people who are homeless, pet ownership has a range of benefits. However, it may also limit a person’s access to services and interventions, and so complicate or even prolong their homelessness. “Pet-friendly” services/interventions – which preserve the relationship between people who are homeless and their pets, whilst also meeting their unique needs – are important. Currently, however, there is limited knowledge about what services/interventions exist for people who are homeless with pets, the impact of these, and how they can be implemented in practice. This systematic review was undertaken to address these gaps. It was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eleven academic journal articles were selected for inclusion. The review identified four key services/interventions which may benefit people who are homeless with pets – pet-friendly accommodation, free veterinary care, free pet food, and foster care/ boarding – in addition to a number of “other” related services/interventions. It identified multiple challenges associated with delivering these services/interventions in practice. None of the studies offered rigorous evaluations – and, therefore, evidence – about “what works.” Further research is essential to identify the most effective and cost-effective approaches.","PeriodicalId":45390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10530789.2023.2205188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many people who are homeless own a companion animal (a “pet”). For people who are homeless, pet ownership has a range of benefits. However, it may also limit a person’s access to services and interventions, and so complicate or even prolong their homelessness. “Pet-friendly” services/interventions – which preserve the relationship between people who are homeless and their pets, whilst also meeting their unique needs – are important. Currently, however, there is limited knowledge about what services/interventions exist for people who are homeless with pets, the impact of these, and how they can be implemented in practice. This systematic review was undertaken to address these gaps. It was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eleven academic journal articles were selected for inclusion. The review identified four key services/interventions which may benefit people who are homeless with pets – pet-friendly accommodation, free veterinary care, free pet food, and foster care/ boarding – in addition to a number of “other” related services/interventions. It identified multiple challenges associated with delivering these services/interventions in practice. None of the studies offered rigorous evaluations – and, therefore, evidence – about “what works.” Further research is essential to identify the most effective and cost-effective approaches.
对有伴侣动物(宠物)的无家可归者的服务和干预:系统回顾
许多无家可归的人都有一只伴侣动物(“宠物”)。对于无家可归的人来说,养宠物有很多好处。然而,它也可能限制一个人获得服务和干预的机会,从而使他们的无家可归复杂化甚至延长。“宠物友好型”服务/干预措施很重要,既能维护无家可归者与宠物之间的关系,又能满足他们的独特需求。然而,目前对于那些有宠物的无家可归者有哪些服务/干预措施、这些服务/干预措施的影响以及如何在实践中实施这些服务/干预措施的了解有限。进行这一系统审查是为了解决这些差距。它是根据PRISMA的指导方针进行的。11篇学术期刊文章入选。除了一些“其他”相关的服务/干预措施外,该审查还确定了四项可能使有宠物的无家可归者受益的关键服务/干预措施——宠物友好住宿、免费兽医护理、免费宠物食品和寄养/寄宿。报告确定了在实践中提供这些服务/干预措施所面临的多重挑战。没有一项研究提供严格的评估——因此,也没有证据——来证明“什么是有效的”。为了确定最有效和最具成本效益的办法,必须进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信