{"title":"Like Snow in the Sun? The German Minority in Denmark in Historical Perspective","authors":"Julie K. Allen","doi":"10.5406/21638195.95.3.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Peter Thaler points out in his preface to the edited volume Like Snow in the Sun? The German Minority in Denmark in Historical Perspective, the EU border region of Sønderjylland (Southern Jutland/Schleswig-Holstein) is often held up today as a model for the harmonious co-existence of different linguistic and ethnic groups, but it is important to remember that this positive state of affairs did not come about easily or quickly. The Danish- and German-oriented groups that form the majority of the region's population (alongside Frisian and plattdüütsch speakers) spent the better part of two centuries jockeying for political and military dominance of the area, with varying degrees of support or pressure from the Danish and German governments and their allies. The overarching story of nationalistic tensions in the border region has been skillfully and evocatively told in several recent publications, including seminal works by Peter Thaler, an associate professor of history at the University of Southern Denmark whose 2009 book Of Mind and Matter: The Duality of National Identity in the German-Danish Borderlands (Purdue University Press) has been foundational for the field. While much of the scholarly focus in such works has been on the challenges faced by the Danish minority living in the duchies occupied or annexed by Germany in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Thaler's new book looks instead at the German-oriented communities that existed within the Danish unified state (helstat) prior to the Second Schleswig War in 1864 and after the 1920 plebiscites that integrated northern Slesvig into the Danish kingdom, offering a much-needed and thoughtful correlative to the better-known stories about the Danish minority.Like Snow in the Sun, which grew out of an international conference held in the UK in 2019, brings together a welcome array of established and emerging scholars’ complementary perspectives on this complex topic, ranging from Thaler's framing narratives about the underlying issues of nationalist activism to PhD candidate Ryan J. Gesme's careful case study of how the plebiscites engaged with Wilsonian rhetoric of self-determination. The chapter authors include Danes, Germans, Brits, Schleswigians, and an American, exemplifying the transnational reach of the topic and its relevance to contemporary political discourses. Eight of the ten chapters focus exclusively on the twentieth century and beyond, from the Great War through the present, in order to explore how the question of cultural identity in this disputed region has continued to be entangled with transnational geopolitical trends and currents. Although the period-specific case studies are primarily historiographic, some of them also contain helpful discussions of intersecting linguistic, propagandistic, ethnographic, and pedagogical aspects of the politically charged situation in the border region.Thaler's introduction both provides a useful chronological framework for the later chapters and contextualizes the situation of the German minority in northern Schleswig with regard to the larger issue of small ethno-linguistic minorities in European border regions, which he also invoked at the end of his 2009 book. The volume's title echoes and challenges the prediction of Danish-oriented activist H. V. Clausen that the numerically insignificant and culturally divided German-oriented minority would “melt away like snow in the sun” (p. 2), informing the volume's analyses of how the German-oriented community in northern Schleswig managed instead to develop and maintain a unique group identity.As the only chapter dedicated to the German-oriented community in the region prior to and during the Prussian annexation of the region, Hans Schultz Hansen's description of the development of an increasingly German-affiliated (rather than regional) movement covers the most well-established historical terrain. In addition to laying important groundwork for the subsequent chapters, it also contains valuable new insights into how the various ideological camps within that population interacted, competed, and ultimately coalesced. Hansen's study spans from the 1840s to 1914, rehearsing both the best-known and several lesser-known incidents of conflict between the two groups in response to the intensification of nationalistic ideologies and political pressures that led to the two Schleswig wars, the annexation of the duchies, the formation of the second German empire in 1871, and, eventually, the outbreak of World War I. In chapter 3, Gesme, drawing on a wide range of governmental documents, campaign posters, and media reports, builds on Hansen's historical foundation to show how the area's German minority reacted to the border plebiscites that the outcome of Great War made possible, not just through the defeat of the Wilhelmine Empire, but also due to the international community's acceptance of Wilsonian ideals of self-determination.From chapter 4 onward, each chapter provides another piece of the puzzle of how the German-oriented community navigated the explosive changes that came about in Germany over the course of the twentieth century. Henrik Becker-Christensen in chapter 4 examines the interplay of nationalist dynamics and political ambitions within the community's associational structure in the 1920s and 1930s, particularly after the rise of the National Socialist party in Germany and its promise of revising the Danish-German border once more, but ends his account on somewhat of a cliffhanger just prior to the Nazi invasion of Denmark in April 1940. Fortunately, Annika Seemann's contribution in chapter 5 seamlessly picks up the narrative thread and carries it through World War II, with its attendant effects on the community's relationship to Denmark and the occupying German army, as well as considering the immediate postwar attempts to achieve political resolution for fractured trust and strained community bonds. Chapter 6 contains Frank Lubowitz's account of reorganizational efforts within the German minority community in the postwar decades, as it came to terms with the reality of living permanently as a linguistic minority within a Danish-majority state. He divides the gradual process of integration into three phases—reconstruction, consolidation, and equality—that track with generational shifts among the community members.One of the volume's greatest strengths, particularly in the latter half of the book, is the immediacy of its access to the existing German minority community today. Drawing on research conducted several decades ago, Michael Byram's examination in chapter 7 of the role of educational institutions in the formation of national identity and socialization of community members in the region in the 1980s makes important points about the centrality of schools to minority identity, but feels somewhat dated in its narrow chronological perspective; it would have been helpful to provide current data for comparison and evaluation of how his conclusions have been borne out since. By contrast, the next two chapters are much more focused on closing the circle to the present: the former principal of the A. P. Møller Danish high school in Schleswig, Jørgen Kühl, presents an expert eyewitness account in chapter 8 as he sketches out the evolution of the German minority over the past quarter-century, due to both external and internal factors, into a “recognized, self-confident, integrated, and active part of Danish society” (p. 9), while, in chapter 9, Scottish Scandinavianist Ruairidh Tarvet assesses the minority community's current hybrid linguistic identity, drawing on recent survey data about code-switching and bilingualism, and explores “how it challenges preconceptions of national minorities as displaced nationals” (p. 9). Thaler's conclusion in chapter 10 not only summarizes the historical arc traced by the preceding chapters, but also reprises many of the points he has made in earlier publications, notably about the region's paradoxical relationship to the historical concept of Schleswig and the cultural specificity of how nationalistic movements developed in different European border regions.This compact but information-rich volume succeeds admirably in accomplishing its editor's goal of filling a gaping hole in the scholarship about the complicated history of the Danish-German border region. Both the Danish- and German-oriented minority communities need to have their stories told if the two hundred years of tensions between them are ever to be fully resolved, and it will require a multiplicity of voices and perspectives, as this volume models, to do those stories justice. The volume is tightly organized and intellectually coherent, while the articles are uniformly well-written and accessible to a broad audience, making them well-suited to classroom use and offering a solid foundation for future research into other, more humanistic and sociological inquiries into the repercussions of political division and cultural hybridity as residents of the border region have experienced and expressed them.","PeriodicalId":44446,"journal":{"name":"SCANDINAVIAN STUDIES","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCANDINAVIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21638195.95.3.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As Peter Thaler points out in his preface to the edited volume Like Snow in the Sun? The German Minority in Denmark in Historical Perspective, the EU border region of Sønderjylland (Southern Jutland/Schleswig-Holstein) is often held up today as a model for the harmonious co-existence of different linguistic and ethnic groups, but it is important to remember that this positive state of affairs did not come about easily or quickly. The Danish- and German-oriented groups that form the majority of the region's population (alongside Frisian and plattdüütsch speakers) spent the better part of two centuries jockeying for political and military dominance of the area, with varying degrees of support or pressure from the Danish and German governments and their allies. The overarching story of nationalistic tensions in the border region has been skillfully and evocatively told in several recent publications, including seminal works by Peter Thaler, an associate professor of history at the University of Southern Denmark whose 2009 book Of Mind and Matter: The Duality of National Identity in the German-Danish Borderlands (Purdue University Press) has been foundational for the field. While much of the scholarly focus in such works has been on the challenges faced by the Danish minority living in the duchies occupied or annexed by Germany in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Thaler's new book looks instead at the German-oriented communities that existed within the Danish unified state (helstat) prior to the Second Schleswig War in 1864 and after the 1920 plebiscites that integrated northern Slesvig into the Danish kingdom, offering a much-needed and thoughtful correlative to the better-known stories about the Danish minority.Like Snow in the Sun, which grew out of an international conference held in the UK in 2019, brings together a welcome array of established and emerging scholars’ complementary perspectives on this complex topic, ranging from Thaler's framing narratives about the underlying issues of nationalist activism to PhD candidate Ryan J. Gesme's careful case study of how the plebiscites engaged with Wilsonian rhetoric of self-determination. The chapter authors include Danes, Germans, Brits, Schleswigians, and an American, exemplifying the transnational reach of the topic and its relevance to contemporary political discourses. Eight of the ten chapters focus exclusively on the twentieth century and beyond, from the Great War through the present, in order to explore how the question of cultural identity in this disputed region has continued to be entangled with transnational geopolitical trends and currents. Although the period-specific case studies are primarily historiographic, some of them also contain helpful discussions of intersecting linguistic, propagandistic, ethnographic, and pedagogical aspects of the politically charged situation in the border region.Thaler's introduction both provides a useful chronological framework for the later chapters and contextualizes the situation of the German minority in northern Schleswig with regard to the larger issue of small ethno-linguistic minorities in European border regions, which he also invoked at the end of his 2009 book. The volume's title echoes and challenges the prediction of Danish-oriented activist H. V. Clausen that the numerically insignificant and culturally divided German-oriented minority would “melt away like snow in the sun” (p. 2), informing the volume's analyses of how the German-oriented community in northern Schleswig managed instead to develop and maintain a unique group identity.As the only chapter dedicated to the German-oriented community in the region prior to and during the Prussian annexation of the region, Hans Schultz Hansen's description of the development of an increasingly German-affiliated (rather than regional) movement covers the most well-established historical terrain. In addition to laying important groundwork for the subsequent chapters, it also contains valuable new insights into how the various ideological camps within that population interacted, competed, and ultimately coalesced. Hansen's study spans from the 1840s to 1914, rehearsing both the best-known and several lesser-known incidents of conflict between the two groups in response to the intensification of nationalistic ideologies and political pressures that led to the two Schleswig wars, the annexation of the duchies, the formation of the second German empire in 1871, and, eventually, the outbreak of World War I. In chapter 3, Gesme, drawing on a wide range of governmental documents, campaign posters, and media reports, builds on Hansen's historical foundation to show how the area's German minority reacted to the border plebiscites that the outcome of Great War made possible, not just through the defeat of the Wilhelmine Empire, but also due to the international community's acceptance of Wilsonian ideals of self-determination.From chapter 4 onward, each chapter provides another piece of the puzzle of how the German-oriented community navigated the explosive changes that came about in Germany over the course of the twentieth century. Henrik Becker-Christensen in chapter 4 examines the interplay of nationalist dynamics and political ambitions within the community's associational structure in the 1920s and 1930s, particularly after the rise of the National Socialist party in Germany and its promise of revising the Danish-German border once more, but ends his account on somewhat of a cliffhanger just prior to the Nazi invasion of Denmark in April 1940. Fortunately, Annika Seemann's contribution in chapter 5 seamlessly picks up the narrative thread and carries it through World War II, with its attendant effects on the community's relationship to Denmark and the occupying German army, as well as considering the immediate postwar attempts to achieve political resolution for fractured trust and strained community bonds. Chapter 6 contains Frank Lubowitz's account of reorganizational efforts within the German minority community in the postwar decades, as it came to terms with the reality of living permanently as a linguistic minority within a Danish-majority state. He divides the gradual process of integration into three phases—reconstruction, consolidation, and equality—that track with generational shifts among the community members.One of the volume's greatest strengths, particularly in the latter half of the book, is the immediacy of its access to the existing German minority community today. Drawing on research conducted several decades ago, Michael Byram's examination in chapter 7 of the role of educational institutions in the formation of national identity and socialization of community members in the region in the 1980s makes important points about the centrality of schools to minority identity, but feels somewhat dated in its narrow chronological perspective; it would have been helpful to provide current data for comparison and evaluation of how his conclusions have been borne out since. By contrast, the next two chapters are much more focused on closing the circle to the present: the former principal of the A. P. Møller Danish high school in Schleswig, Jørgen Kühl, presents an expert eyewitness account in chapter 8 as he sketches out the evolution of the German minority over the past quarter-century, due to both external and internal factors, into a “recognized, self-confident, integrated, and active part of Danish society” (p. 9), while, in chapter 9, Scottish Scandinavianist Ruairidh Tarvet assesses the minority community's current hybrid linguistic identity, drawing on recent survey data about code-switching and bilingualism, and explores “how it challenges preconceptions of national minorities as displaced nationals” (p. 9). Thaler's conclusion in chapter 10 not only summarizes the historical arc traced by the preceding chapters, but also reprises many of the points he has made in earlier publications, notably about the region's paradoxical relationship to the historical concept of Schleswig and the cultural specificity of how nationalistic movements developed in different European border regions.This compact but information-rich volume succeeds admirably in accomplishing its editor's goal of filling a gaping hole in the scholarship about the complicated history of the Danish-German border region. Both the Danish- and German-oriented minority communities need to have their stories told if the two hundred years of tensions between them are ever to be fully resolved, and it will require a multiplicity of voices and perspectives, as this volume models, to do those stories justice. The volume is tightly organized and intellectually coherent, while the articles are uniformly well-written and accessible to a broad audience, making them well-suited to classroom use and offering a solid foundation for future research into other, more humanistic and sociological inquiries into the repercussions of political division and cultural hybridity as residents of the border region have experienced and expressed them.
从第4章开始,每一章都提供了另一个谜题,即以德国为导向的社会是如何驾驭20世纪德国发生的爆炸性变化的。亨里克·贝克尔-克里斯滕森在第四章中考察了20世纪20年代和30年代,特别是在德国国家社会主义党崛起并承诺再次修改丹麦-德国边界之后,民族主义动力和政治野心在社区协会结构中的相互作用,但在1940年4月纳粹入侵丹麦之前,他的叙述有些悬念。幸运的是,安妮卡·西曼在第五章的贡献无缝地抓住了叙事线索,并将其贯穿到第二次世界大战,以及随之而来的对社区与丹麦和占领的德国军队的关系的影响,以及考虑到战后立即试图实现政治解决破碎的信任和紧张的社区关系。第六章包含弗兰克·卢博维茨(Frank Lubowitz)对战后几十年德国少数民族社区重组努力的描述,因为它接受了在丹麦人占多数的国家中作为语言少数民族永久生活的现实。他将逐渐融合的过程分为三个阶段——重建、巩固和平等——这三个阶段与社区成员之间的代际变化密切相关。这本书最大的优势之一,特别是在书的后半部分,是它直接接触到现有的德国少数民族社区。借鉴几十年前的研究,迈克尔·拜拉姆(Michael Byram)在第7章中对20世纪80年代该地区教育机构在形成民族认同和社区成员社会化方面的作用的考察,对学校对少数民族认同的中心地位提出了重要观点,但从其狭隘的时间角度来看,感觉有些过时;如果能提供目前的数据来比较和评价他的结论是如何得到证实的,那将是有帮助的。相比之下,接下来的两章更侧重于结束对现在的循环:石勒苏wig的a . p. m . øller丹麦高中的前校长Jørgen k<e:2>在第8章中以专家的视角描述了在过去的25年里,由于外部和内部因素,德国少数民族演变成“被认可的、自信的、完整的、活跃的丹麦社会的一部分”(第9页),而在第9章中,苏格兰斯堪的纳维亚主义者Ruairidh Tarvet评估了少数民族社区目前的混合语言身份。利用最近关于代码转换和双语的调查数据,并探讨了“它如何挑战少数民族作为流离失所的国民的先入之见”(第9页)。塞勒在第10章的结论不仅总结了前几章所追踪的历史轨迹,而且重申了他在早期出版物中提出的许多观点。特别是关于该地区与石勒苏益格历史概念的矛盾关系,以及民族主义运动如何在不同欧洲边境地区发展的文化特殊性。这本紧凑但信息丰富的书令人钦佩地完成了编辑的目标,填补了关于丹麦-德国边境地区复杂历史的学术空白。如果要完全解决两百年来的紧张关系,以丹麦和德国为导向的少数民族社区都需要讲述他们的故事,这将需要多种声音和观点,正如这本书所描述的那样,来公正地讲述这些故事。这本书组织严密,思想上连贯,而文章都是统一的,写得很好,可以接触到广泛的受众,使它们非常适合课堂使用,并为未来的研究提供了坚实的基础,更多的人文和社会学调查政治分裂和文化混杂的影响,因为边境地区的居民已经经历和表达了他们。
期刊介绍:
Thank you for visiting the internet homepages of the Department of Scandinavian Studies at the University of Washington. The Department of Scandinavian Studies was founded in 1909 by a special act of the Washington State Legislature. In the 99 years of its existence, the Department has grown from a one-person program to a comprehensive Scandinavian Studies department with a faculty fully engaged in leading-edge scholarship, award-winning teaching and dedicated university and community service.