Thornton’s Legislative Drafting

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Daniel Greenberg
{"title":"Thornton’s Legislative Drafting","authors":"Daniel Greenberg","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmac014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I have been using and enjoying Thornton’s Legislative Drafting for over 30 years, and although I cannot say that I have consulted it regularly or frequently, my occasional resorts to its wisdom have generally been rewarded with something of value, particularly in my early years as a drafter. One thing that all practitioners of the art of legislative drafting agree (and it is very possibly the only thing on which they all agree) is that you cannot teach legislative drafting at a theoretical level, and one can learn the art only by performing it under constructive supervision. For that reason, office manuals in legislative drafting offices that attempt to constrain the drafter to follow set devices and patterns to deal with particular legislative situations are notoriously doomed to failure, because the drafter needs to be free to apply her or his mind to the widest possible set of legal, political and other circumstances in crafting each provision, whether it appears to follow well-trodden policy paths or to be entirely novel.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmac014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I have been using and enjoying Thornton’s Legislative Drafting for over 30 years, and although I cannot say that I have consulted it regularly or frequently, my occasional resorts to its wisdom have generally been rewarded with something of value, particularly in my early years as a drafter. One thing that all practitioners of the art of legislative drafting agree (and it is very possibly the only thing on which they all agree) is that you cannot teach legislative drafting at a theoretical level, and one can learn the art only by performing it under constructive supervision. For that reason, office manuals in legislative drafting offices that attempt to constrain the drafter to follow set devices and patterns to deal with particular legislative situations are notoriously doomed to failure, because the drafter needs to be free to apply her or his mind to the widest possible set of legal, political and other circumstances in crafting each provision, whether it appears to follow well-trodden policy paths or to be entirely novel.
桑顿的立法草案
30多年来,我一直在使用和享受桑顿的《立法起草》,虽然我不能说我经常或经常查阅它,但我偶尔借鉴它的智慧,通常会得到一些有价值的回报,尤其是在我作为起草人的早期。所有立法起草艺术的实践者都同意的一件事(这很可能是他们都同意的唯一一件事)是,你不能在理论层面上教授立法起草,一个人只有在建设性的监督下才能学习立法起草艺术。因此,立法起草办公室的办公室手册试图限制起草者遵循既定的手段和模式来处理特定的立法情况,这是出了名的注定要失败的,因为起草者在起草每一项规定时,需要自由地将自己的思想应用到尽可能广泛的法律、政治和其他情况中,无论它看起来是遵循常规的政策路径,还是完全新颖的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信