Commemoration in the management practices of the Soviet elite in 1960–1970-ies (on the example of the Penza region)

O. A. Sukhova
{"title":"Commemoration in the management practices of the Soviet elite in 1960–1970-ies (on the example of the Penza region)","authors":"O. A. Sukhova","doi":"10.18287/2542-0445-2023-29-3-51-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to analyze the practices of commemoration and memorial culture in the Penza region in the 1960–1970-ies. The issues of periodization of development of memorial culture and historical politics, the content of collective memories, transformation of social reflection, forms and means of commemoration are considered. An assessment is made of the possibility of using the methodological tools of the «new political history» at the regional and local levels of problem development. The high source potential of materials of personal origin in the study of commemorative content in narratives, symbols and signs is noted. In the course of the analysis of historiography of the problem, a pluralism of value judgments regarding the «instrumentality» of Soviet historical policy was revealed. Conclusions are drawn about the need for an objective analysis of national specifics, including in relation to the memory of the past, in the search for universal content in the structures of memorial culture. The evolution of functionality and content of historical politics in the 1960–1970-ies is traced: the general trend of the process is the decline in interest in the symbolic practices of the revolutionary era and the establishment of a new «organizing» idea as a manifestation of social demand for solidarity and common identity. The memory of the victims of the struggle for Soviet power as a tool of legitimization is giving way to socially significant experiences (memory of the Great Patriotic War) and the idea of restoring the unity of memory, a tolerant attitude towards the past as a whole, which united both the imperial and Soviet heritage. The factor of traumatic order is the memory of Stalin. The period under review also saw the institutionalization of the system of socio-political interaction in the field of memorial culture.","PeriodicalId":495004,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriâ, pedagogika, filologiâ","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriâ, pedagogika, filologiâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2023-29-3-51-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze the practices of commemoration and memorial culture in the Penza region in the 1960–1970-ies. The issues of periodization of development of memorial culture and historical politics, the content of collective memories, transformation of social reflection, forms and means of commemoration are considered. An assessment is made of the possibility of using the methodological tools of the «new political history» at the regional and local levels of problem development. The high source potential of materials of personal origin in the study of commemorative content in narratives, symbols and signs is noted. In the course of the analysis of historiography of the problem, a pluralism of value judgments regarding the «instrumentality» of Soviet historical policy was revealed. Conclusions are drawn about the need for an objective analysis of national specifics, including in relation to the memory of the past, in the search for universal content in the structures of memorial culture. The evolution of functionality and content of historical politics in the 1960–1970-ies is traced: the general trend of the process is the decline in interest in the symbolic practices of the revolutionary era and the establishment of a new «organizing» idea as a manifestation of social demand for solidarity and common identity. The memory of the victims of the struggle for Soviet power as a tool of legitimization is giving way to socially significant experiences (memory of the Great Patriotic War) and the idea of restoring the unity of memory, a tolerant attitude towards the past as a whole, which united both the imperial and Soviet heritage. The factor of traumatic order is the memory of Stalin. The period under review also saw the institutionalization of the system of socio-political interaction in the field of memorial culture.
1960 - 1970年代苏联精英管理实践中的纪念(以奔萨地区为例)
本研究的目的是分析奔萨地区在1960 - 1970年代的纪念实践和纪念文化。探讨了纪念文化与历史政治发展的时代化、集体记忆的内容、社会反思的转变、纪念的形式与手段等问题。评估了在区域和地方问题发展层面使用“新政治史”方法工具的可能性。注意到个人来源的材料在研究叙事、符号和标志中的纪念内容方面具有很高的来源潜力。在对这一问题的史学分析过程中,揭示了关于苏联历史政策“工具性”的价值判断的多元性。得出的结论是,需要客观分析国家的具体情况,包括与过去的记忆有关的情况,以便在纪念文化的结构中寻找普遍的内容。本文追溯了20世纪60 - 70年代历史政治的功能和内容的演变:这一过程的总体趋势是对革命时代的象征性实践的兴趣下降,并建立了一种新的“组织”理念,作为对团结和共同身份的社会需求的表现。作为合法化工具的苏维埃权力斗争的受害者的记忆正在让位于具有社会意义的经验(对卫国战争的记忆)和恢复记忆统一的想法,对过去作为一个整体的宽容态度,将帝国和苏维埃遗产结合在一起。创伤性秩序的因素是对斯大林的记忆。在本报告所述期间,纪念文化领域的社会政治互动系统也制度化了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书