Kan effektiv porøsitet bruges til at estimere boringsnære beskyttelseszoner i opsprækket kalk?

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jacob Kidmose, Bertel Nilsson, Niels Korsholm Klem, Philip Grinder Pedersen, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, Torben O. Sonnenborg
{"title":"Kan effektiv porøsitet bruges til at estimere boringsnære beskyttelseszoner i opsprækket kalk?","authors":"Jacob Kidmose, Bertel Nilsson, Niels Korsholm Klem, Philip Grinder Pedersen, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, Torben O. Sonnenborg","doi":"10.1007/s10040-023-02743-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Protection of fractured carbonate aquifers is often based on a single-porosity description of a dual-porosity system. However, it is difficult to assess a trustworthy value of the effective porosity based on scientific principles; thus, a range of estimates is often suggested. The complexity of the problem is compounded by the fact that the effective porosity may be scale-dependent. This paper investigates whether it is possible to describe solute transport in fractured carbonate rocks with an equivalent porous medium model using a constant value of effective porosity. It is assumed that the dual-porosity model provides an acceptable description of transport mechanisms in fractured porous rock and that it is possible to estimate the parameters needed in the single-porosity models from results generated by the dual-porosity model. The effective porosity is estimated from the dual-porosity results that are used as targets. For Danish chalk, an effective porosity of 13% (11–17%) is estimated. However, it is demonstrated that the estimated effective porosity is only valid at the specific transport time (1 year) from which simulation results of the dual-porosity model were extracted. The effective porosity is shown to increase with travel time until equilibrium conditions are realised between the fractures and matrix, following which, the effective porosity equals the matrix porosity and will maintain this value at larger transport times. Assuming that the dual-porosity model provides a trustworthy description of solute transport in fractured chalk and limestone, a method to estimate the effective porosity of an equivalent porous medium model is presented.","PeriodicalId":13013,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogeology Journal","volume":"282 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02743-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Protection of fractured carbonate aquifers is often based on a single-porosity description of a dual-porosity system. However, it is difficult to assess a trustworthy value of the effective porosity based on scientific principles; thus, a range of estimates is often suggested. The complexity of the problem is compounded by the fact that the effective porosity may be scale-dependent. This paper investigates whether it is possible to describe solute transport in fractured carbonate rocks with an equivalent porous medium model using a constant value of effective porosity. It is assumed that the dual-porosity model provides an acceptable description of transport mechanisms in fractured porous rock and that it is possible to estimate the parameters needed in the single-porosity models from results generated by the dual-porosity model. The effective porosity is estimated from the dual-porosity results that are used as targets. For Danish chalk, an effective porosity of 13% (11–17%) is estimated. However, it is demonstrated that the estimated effective porosity is only valid at the specific transport time (1 year) from which simulation results of the dual-porosity model were extracted. The effective porosity is shown to increase with travel time until equilibrium conditions are realised between the fractures and matrix, following which, the effective porosity equals the matrix porosity and will maintain this value at larger transport times. Assuming that the dual-porosity model provides a trustworthy description of solute transport in fractured chalk and limestone, a method to estimate the effective porosity of an equivalent porous medium model is presented.

Abstract Image

有效孔隙度能否用于估算断裂石灰岩中的近钻孔保护带?
裂缝性碳酸盐岩含水层的保护通常基于双孔隙系统的单孔隙度描述。然而,很难根据科学原理对有效孔隙度进行可靠的评估;因此,通常会提出一个估计范围。有效孔隙度可能与尺度有关,这一事实使问题更加复杂。本文探讨了是否有可能用等效孔隙介质模型用恒定的有效孔隙度来描述裂缝性碳酸盐岩中的溶质输运。假设双孔隙度模型能较好地描述裂缝性多孔岩石的输运机制,并且可以从双孔隙度模型的结果中估计出单孔隙度模型所需的参数。有效孔隙度是根据双重孔隙度结果作为目标来估计的。对于丹麦白垩,有效孔隙率估计为13%(11-17%)。然而,研究表明,估算的有效孔隙度仅在提取双重孔隙度模型模拟结果的特定输送时间(1年)有效。有效孔隙度随着运移时间的增加而增加,直到裂缝和基质之间达到平衡状态,之后,有效孔隙度等于基质孔隙度,并在较大的运移时间内保持该值。假设双重孔隙度模型能够可靠地描述裂隙白垩质和灰岩中的溶质运移,提出了一种估算等效多孔介质模型有效孔隙度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrogeology Journal
Hydrogeology Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hydrogeology Journal was founded in 1992 to foster understanding of hydrogeology; to describe worldwide progress in hydrogeology; and to provide an accessible forum for scientists, researchers, engineers, and practitioners in developing and industrialized countries. Since then, the journal has earned a large worldwide readership. Its peer-reviewed research articles integrate subsurface hydrology and geology with supporting disciplines: geochemistry, geophysics, geomorphology, geobiology, surface-water hydrology, tectonics, numerical modeling, economics, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信