Muslim women consumers: Critical interpretations of US modest fashion brands entangled with the fashion-advocacy-capitalist-façade

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shanti Amalanathan, Kelly L. Reddy-Best
{"title":"Muslim women consumers: Critical interpretations of US modest fashion brands entangled with the fashion-advocacy-capitalist-façade","authors":"Shanti Amalanathan, Kelly L. Reddy-Best","doi":"10.1386/fspc_00192_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following 9/11, some young Muslim American women have been wearing hijabs to assert their Islamic identities. They are also seeking fashionable modest clothing, yet, despite their growing buying power, the US modest fashion market targeting Muslim women appears underserved. The purpose of this study was to critically examine how niche modest fashion brands in the United States target Muslim women while drawing upon theoretical concepts centring on oppression and agency related to the long history of gendered Islamophobia Muslims have experienced. We analysed eleven brands’ websites and social media applying the constant comparative method and identified four themes: empowering Muslim women, reclaiming modesty as modern and beautiful, meeting fashionable modest wear demand, and rejecting and perpetuating colourism. In our analysis of the digital discourses of US modest fashion brands, we revealed that these brands emerged to meet the demand of young Muslim woman in the United States who are embracing the hijab and modest clothing as a potent symbol of resistance against western ideologies, the fashion system’s oppressive acts towards Muslim women and traditional Islamic dress codes. Yet, their advocacy-centred messages – empowerment, reclaiming modesty as beautiful – operate within a profit-driven system, which we theorize as a fashion-advocacy-capitalistic-façade . The fashion-advocacy-capitalist-façade concept helps explain the slippery slope that fashion brands are tiptoeing as they aim to empower Muslim women, offer trendy modest clothing, reject traditional Islamic dress codes for women and create space in the fashion market for this unmet demand. Although these brands aim to promote a positive sense of self for Muslim women, they cannot be withheld from critical examination and potential interpretations when operating within the capitalist-driven industry that is so often plagued with significant injustices.","PeriodicalId":41621,"journal":{"name":"Fashion Style & Popular Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fashion Style & Popular Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc_00192_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following 9/11, some young Muslim American women have been wearing hijabs to assert their Islamic identities. They are also seeking fashionable modest clothing, yet, despite their growing buying power, the US modest fashion market targeting Muslim women appears underserved. The purpose of this study was to critically examine how niche modest fashion brands in the United States target Muslim women while drawing upon theoretical concepts centring on oppression and agency related to the long history of gendered Islamophobia Muslims have experienced. We analysed eleven brands’ websites and social media applying the constant comparative method and identified four themes: empowering Muslim women, reclaiming modesty as modern and beautiful, meeting fashionable modest wear demand, and rejecting and perpetuating colourism. In our analysis of the digital discourses of US modest fashion brands, we revealed that these brands emerged to meet the demand of young Muslim woman in the United States who are embracing the hijab and modest clothing as a potent symbol of resistance against western ideologies, the fashion system’s oppressive acts towards Muslim women and traditional Islamic dress codes. Yet, their advocacy-centred messages – empowerment, reclaiming modesty as beautiful – operate within a profit-driven system, which we theorize as a fashion-advocacy-capitalistic-façade . The fashion-advocacy-capitalist-façade concept helps explain the slippery slope that fashion brands are tiptoeing as they aim to empower Muslim women, offer trendy modest clothing, reject traditional Islamic dress codes for women and create space in the fashion market for this unmet demand. Although these brands aim to promote a positive sense of self for Muslim women, they cannot be withheld from critical examination and potential interpretations when operating within the capitalist-driven industry that is so often plagued with significant injustices.
穆斯林女性消费者:对美国适度时尚品牌的批判性解读,这些品牌与时尚倡导-资本主义- faalade纠缠在一起
9/11之后,一些年轻的美国穆斯林妇女一直戴着头巾来彰显她们的伊斯兰身份。她们也在寻找时尚的朴素服装,然而,尽管她们的购买力不断增强,针对穆斯林女性的美国朴素时装市场似乎服务不足。本研究的目的是批判性地审视美国的小众时尚品牌是如何瞄准穆斯林女性的,同时借鉴了与穆斯林所经历的性别伊斯兰恐惧症的悠久历史有关的压迫和代理的理论概念。我们采用持续比较的方法分析了11个品牌的网站和社交媒体,并确定了四个主题:赋予穆斯林女性权力,恢复现代和美丽的谦虚,满足时尚适度的着装需求,拒绝并延续肤色歧视。在我们对美国适度时尚品牌的数字话语的分析中,我们发现这些品牌的出现是为了满足美国年轻穆斯林女性的需求,这些女性将头巾和适度的服装作为抵抗西方意识形态、时尚系统对穆斯林女性的压迫行为和传统伊斯兰服装规范的有力象征。然而,他们以倡导为中心的信息——赋予权力,恢复谦虚的美丽——在一个利润驱动的系统中运作,我们将其理论化为时尚-倡导-资本主义- farade。时尚-倡导-资本家- faade的概念有助于解释时尚品牌在为穆斯林女性赋权、提供时尚适度的服装、拒绝传统的伊斯兰女性着装规范、在时尚市场为这一未被满足的需求创造空间时踮起脚尖的滑坡现象。尽管这些品牌的目标是促进穆斯林女性积极的自我意识,但当它们在资本主义驱动的行业中运作时,它们不能受到批判性的审查和潜在的解释,这个行业经常受到严重不公正的困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fashion Style & Popular Culture
Fashion Style & Popular Culture HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信