Disintermediation and disinformation as a political strategy: use of AI to analyse fake news as Trump’s rhetorical resource on Twitter

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Alba Diez-Gracia, Pilar Sánchez-García, Javier Martín-Román
{"title":"Disintermediation and disinformation as a political strategy: use of AI to analyse fake news as Trump’s rhetorical resource on Twitter","authors":"Alba Diez-Gracia, Pilar Sánchez-García, Javier Martín-Román","doi":"10.3145/epi.2023.sep.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The communicative effects of disintermediation caused by social media promote the expansion of personalist and emotional political discourses that reach the audience directly and evade the traditional journalistic filter. This phenomenon leads to new political communication tactics, but also exposes citizens to potentially fraudulent, contaminated or polarised content. In this context, framed in post-truth, the term ‘fake news’ gains relevance as a way of referring to disinformation and as a political and performative argument that can be weaponised. This research aims to analyse such use in the discourse of the former president Donald Trump during his presidential term (2017-2021), focussing on Twitter as the main platform in his political communication strategy online. To analyse this, we resort to a methodological triangulation of content, discourse, and sentiment analysis, with the latter combining both lexicon and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques through machine learning on the basis of deep learning and natural language processing, which is applied to his messages published with the term ‘fake news’ (N = 768). The analysis of the sample, provided here in an open dataset, employs self-developed software that allows each unit of analysis to be filtered and coded around its predominant themes, sentiments, and words. The main results confirm that Trump’s attribution of ‘fake news’ focusses on three main topics: the media (53%), politics (40%) and his cabinet (33%). It also shows how the former president resorts to a personalist agenda, focussed on the defence of his proposals and his team (80%) by delegitimizing his opponents and the press, with a negative tone (72%) loaded with derogatory terms, confirming a weaponised strategy of the term ‘fake news’ as a political argument of disinformation and disintermediation.","PeriodicalId":20684,"journal":{"name":"Profesional De La Informacion","volume":"39 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profesional De La Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The communicative effects of disintermediation caused by social media promote the expansion of personalist and emotional political discourses that reach the audience directly and evade the traditional journalistic filter. This phenomenon leads to new political communication tactics, but also exposes citizens to potentially fraudulent, contaminated or polarised content. In this context, framed in post-truth, the term ‘fake news’ gains relevance as a way of referring to disinformation and as a political and performative argument that can be weaponised. This research aims to analyse such use in the discourse of the former president Donald Trump during his presidential term (2017-2021), focussing on Twitter as the main platform in his political communication strategy online. To analyse this, we resort to a methodological triangulation of content, discourse, and sentiment analysis, with the latter combining both lexicon and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques through machine learning on the basis of deep learning and natural language processing, which is applied to his messages published with the term ‘fake news’ (N = 768). The analysis of the sample, provided here in an open dataset, employs self-developed software that allows each unit of analysis to be filtered and coded around its predominant themes, sentiments, and words. The main results confirm that Trump’s attribution of ‘fake news’ focusses on three main topics: the media (53%), politics (40%) and his cabinet (33%). It also shows how the former president resorts to a personalist agenda, focussed on the defence of his proposals and his team (80%) by delegitimizing his opponents and the press, with a negative tone (72%) loaded with derogatory terms, confirming a weaponised strategy of the term ‘fake news’ as a political argument of disinformation and disintermediation.
作为政治策略的去中介化和虚假信息:利用人工智能分析假新闻,作为特朗普在Twitter上的修辞资源
社交媒体造成的去中介化的传播效应促进了个人主义和情绪化的政治话语的扩张,这些话语直接到达受众,避开了传统的新闻过滤器。这种现象导致了新的政治传播策略,但也使公民暴露在潜在的欺诈、污染或两极分化的内容中。在后真相时代的背景下,“假新闻”一词作为一种指称虚假信息的方式,以及一种可以被武器化的政治和表演论点,具有了相关性。本研究旨在分析前总统唐纳德·特朗普在其总统任期(2017-2021)期间话语中的这种使用,重点关注Twitter作为其在线政治传播策略的主要平台。为了分析这一点,我们采用了内容、话语和情感分析的方法学三角测量,后者通过基于深度学习和自然语言处理的机器学习将词汇和人工智能(AI)技术结合起来,应用于他发布的带有“假新闻”一词的消息(N = 768)。样本的分析,在这里提供了一个开放的数据集,使用自主开发的软件,允许每个分析单元围绕其主要主题,情感和单词进行过滤和编码。主要结果证实,特朗普的“假新闻”主要集中在三个主题上:媒体(53%)、政治(40%)和他的内阁(33%)。它还显示了这位前总统如何诉诸个人主义议程,通过贬低对手和媒体的合法性,专注于为他的提议和他的团队辩护(80%),用负面的语气(72%)充满贬义的术语,证实了“假新闻”一词的武器化策略,作为虚假信息和非中介的政治论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: El profesional de la información es una revista sobre información, bibliotecas y nuevas tecnologías de la información. Primera revista española de Biblioteconomía y Documentación indexada por las dos bases de datos bibliográficas internacionales más importantes: ISI Social Science Citation Index y Scopus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信