Clinical predictive scores for detection of sub-clinical atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic or embolic stroke of undetermined source: A brief systematic review
{"title":"Clinical predictive scores for detection of sub-clinical atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic or embolic stroke of undetermined source: A brief systematic review","authors":"Luca Masotti, Elisa Grifoni","doi":"10.36922/bh.0955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subclinical atrial fibrillation (SAF) is the primary underlying cause of cryptogenic stroke (CS) or embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), particularly in patients over 65 years of age. Therefore, it is strongly recommended screening for SAF in these patients. The development of tools designed to determine the priority of SAF screening is essential for optimizing the diagnostic workup. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical predictive scores available for SAF detection in patients with CS or ESUS. We gathered data from articles published on the PubMed database from January 1, 2000, to January 31, 2023. Our search yielded eight scores for CS and three for ESUS. SAF diagnosis was established using various methods: 12-lead ECG or 24-h ECG monitoring during 1-year follow-up in three scores; 72-h non-implantable ECG monitoring in two scores; 2 or 3-week non-implantable ECG monitoring in three scores; and implantable ECG monitoring in one score. In two scores, ECG monitoring was performed using a non-implantable and/or implantable loop recorder. Overall, the rate of SAF detection was approximately 6% when using devices for monitoring lasting no more than 72 h and increased to nearly 22% employing 2 or 3-week non-implantable or implantable devices. SAF was defined differently in various scores; five scores considered any episode, even if shorter than 30 s, while six scores required episodes to last at least 30 s. Advanced age was included as a variable in 10 of 11 scores, whereas left atrial enlargement, premature atrial beats, and brain computed tomography characteristics were features in four scores. The area under the curve values of these scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. In conclusion, it is still challenging to put the currently available clinical scores to use due to a lack of validation. To provide more comprehensive guidance, it is essential to conduct large prospective multicenter trials in the future.","PeriodicalId":10091,"journal":{"name":"中华老年心脑血管病杂志","volume":"36 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华老年心脑血管病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/bh.0955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Subclinical atrial fibrillation (SAF) is the primary underlying cause of cryptogenic stroke (CS) or embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), particularly in patients over 65 years of age. Therefore, it is strongly recommended screening for SAF in these patients. The development of tools designed to determine the priority of SAF screening is essential for optimizing the diagnostic workup. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical predictive scores available for SAF detection in patients with CS or ESUS. We gathered data from articles published on the PubMed database from January 1, 2000, to January 31, 2023. Our search yielded eight scores for CS and three for ESUS. SAF diagnosis was established using various methods: 12-lead ECG or 24-h ECG monitoring during 1-year follow-up in three scores; 72-h non-implantable ECG monitoring in two scores; 2 or 3-week non-implantable ECG monitoring in three scores; and implantable ECG monitoring in one score. In two scores, ECG monitoring was performed using a non-implantable and/or implantable loop recorder. Overall, the rate of SAF detection was approximately 6% when using devices for monitoring lasting no more than 72 h and increased to nearly 22% employing 2 or 3-week non-implantable or implantable devices. SAF was defined differently in various scores; five scores considered any episode, even if shorter than 30 s, while six scores required episodes to last at least 30 s. Advanced age was included as a variable in 10 of 11 scores, whereas left atrial enlargement, premature atrial beats, and brain computed tomography characteristics were features in four scores. The area under the curve values of these scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. In conclusion, it is still challenging to put the currently available clinical scores to use due to a lack of validation. To provide more comprehensive guidance, it is essential to conduct large prospective multicenter trials in the future.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart Brain and Vessel Diseases (monthly) was founded in 1999. It is a medical professional academic journal published domestically and internationally and is supervised by China Rongtong Medical Health Group Co., Ltd. and sponsored by Rongtong Medical Health Journal Publishing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. It mainly reports on the latest research results and research progress of professional academic hotspots such as clinical diagnosis and treatment of elderly cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. The main columns include expert reviews, guidelines and consensus, guidelines and suggestions, expert forums, meeting minutes, clinical research, basic research, short reports, experience exchange, academic trends, case reports, reviews, and continuing education. Over the years, it has always adhered to the purpose of serving the development of geriatric medicine, so that the journal has been continuously improved and improved in terms of journal quality and academic level, and gradually gained recognition and praise from medical experts.
Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart Brain and Vessel Diseases is a high-quality Chinese scientific journal, a core journal in the clinical medicine/special medicine category of the 2023 edition of the "Overview of Chinese Core Journals", and a statistical source journal for Chinese scientific papers (Chinese core scientific journals). It is included in the "Compendium of High-Quality Scientific and Technological Journal Classification Catalog" released by the China Association for Science and Technology in 2023, and is included in the World Journal Impact Index (WJCI) report (2023 Science and Technology Edition). It is also included in more than 10 domestic and foreign databases such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Chemical Abstracts.