Uncertainty’s impact on adaptive performance in the post-COVID era: The moderating role of perceived leader’s effectiveness

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Ana Junça-Silva, António Caetano
{"title":"Uncertainty’s impact on adaptive performance in the post-COVID era: The moderating role of perceived leader’s effectiveness","authors":"Ana Junça-Silva, António Caetano","doi":"10.1177/23409444231202809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study builds upon existing research on daily adaptive performance by focusing on two main aspects: (1) the fluctuations within individuals concerning uncertainty in relation to daily negative affect and daily adaptive performance and (2) the variations between individuals in the perceived effectiveness of their leaders as a relevant boundary condition of these relationships. Data were gathered during a post-COVID phase from a sample of 176 Portuguese working adults, for 10 days, resulting in a total of 1,760 measurement occasions. The results of the multilevel analysis revealed a positive correlation between fluctuations in daily uncertainty and daily negative affect. Notably, this relationship was influenced by the perceived effectiveness of leaders. Specifically, the presence of an effective leader mitigated the heightened negative affect caused by increased uncertainty. In addition, the findings demonstrated a positive link between daily negative affect and daily adaptive performance. Moreover, a statistically significant indirect effect was observed, indicating that uncertainty led to fluctuations in adaptive performance through its impact on daily negative affect. Essentially, higher levels of uncertainty contributed to increased negative affect among employees, subsequently influencing their daily adaptive performance. It is important to note that this pathway was further influenced by the perceived effectiveness of leaders. In cases where employees perceived their leaders as less effective, the connection between negative affect and adaptive performance was more pronounced. This study underscores the significance of perceived effective leadership, particularly in unique contexts such as the post-COVID era: an effective leader is always good for affective regulation, but a less effective leader is not always bad regarding adaptive performance. This complexity prompts discussions on implications for both theoretical understanding and practical application. JEL CLASSIFICATION M0","PeriodicalId":46891,"journal":{"name":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444231202809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study builds upon existing research on daily adaptive performance by focusing on two main aspects: (1) the fluctuations within individuals concerning uncertainty in relation to daily negative affect and daily adaptive performance and (2) the variations between individuals in the perceived effectiveness of their leaders as a relevant boundary condition of these relationships. Data were gathered during a post-COVID phase from a sample of 176 Portuguese working adults, for 10 days, resulting in a total of 1,760 measurement occasions. The results of the multilevel analysis revealed a positive correlation between fluctuations in daily uncertainty and daily negative affect. Notably, this relationship was influenced by the perceived effectiveness of leaders. Specifically, the presence of an effective leader mitigated the heightened negative affect caused by increased uncertainty. In addition, the findings demonstrated a positive link between daily negative affect and daily adaptive performance. Moreover, a statistically significant indirect effect was observed, indicating that uncertainty led to fluctuations in adaptive performance through its impact on daily negative affect. Essentially, higher levels of uncertainty contributed to increased negative affect among employees, subsequently influencing their daily adaptive performance. It is important to note that this pathway was further influenced by the perceived effectiveness of leaders. In cases where employees perceived their leaders as less effective, the connection between negative affect and adaptive performance was more pronounced. This study underscores the significance of perceived effective leadership, particularly in unique contexts such as the post-COVID era: an effective leader is always good for affective regulation, but a less effective leader is not always bad regarding adaptive performance. This complexity prompts discussions on implications for both theoretical understanding and practical application. JEL CLASSIFICATION M0
后新冠时代不确定性对适应性绩效的影响:感知领导者有效性的调节作用
本研究建立在现有的日常适应性绩效研究的基础上,重点关注两个主要方面:(1)与日常负面情绪和日常适应性绩效相关的不确定性在个体内部的波动;(2)作为这些关系的相关边界条件,个体之间对领导者感知有效性的差异。在疫情后阶段,对176名葡萄牙成年工作人员进行了为期10天的数据收集,共进行了1760次测量。多层分析的结果显示,每日不确定性波动与每日负面影响之间存在正相关关系。值得注意的是,这种关系受到领导者感知有效性的影响。具体来说,一个有效的领导者的存在减轻了不确定性增加所引起的高度负面影响。此外,研究结果还表明,日常消极情绪与日常适应性表现之间存在正相关。此外,还观察到统计上显著的间接影响,表明不确定性通过对日常负面影响的影响导致适应性表现的波动。从本质上讲,更高水平的不确定性会增加员工的负面影响,从而影响他们的日常适应性表现。值得注意的是,这一途径进一步受到领导者感知有效性的影响。在员工认为领导效率较低的情况下,消极情绪与适应性表现之间的联系更为明显。这项研究强调了感知有效领导的重要性,特别是在后covid时代等独特背景下:有效的领导者总是有利于情感调节,但效率较低的领导者并不总是不利于适应性表现。这种复杂性引发了对理论理解和实际应用的影响的讨论。凝胶分类m0
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信