Developing a generic business case for an advanced chronic liver disease support service

IF 2.4 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mark Wright, Sarah Willmore, Sumita Verma, Anita Omasta-Martin, Humraj Sahota, Wendy Prentice, Amelia Jane Stockley, Fiona Finlay, Julia Verne, Ben Hudson
{"title":"Developing a generic business case for an advanced chronic liver disease support service","authors":"Mark Wright, Sarah Willmore, Sumita Verma, Anita Omasta-Martin, Humraj Sahota, Wendy Prentice, Amelia Jane Stockley, Fiona Finlay, Julia Verne, Ben Hudson","doi":"10.1136/flgastro-2023-102530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Liver disease deaths are rising, but specialist palliative care services for hepatology are limited. Expansion across the NHS is required. Methods We surveyed clinicians, patients and carers to design an ‘ideal’ service. Using standard NHS tariffs, we calculated the cost of this service. In hospitals where specialist palliative care was available for liver disease, patient-level costs and bed utilisation in last year of life (LYOL) were compared between those seen by specialist palliative care before death and those not. Results The ‘ideal’ service was described. Costs were calculated as whole time equivalent for a minimal service, which could be scaled up. From a hospital with an existing service, patients seen by specialist palliative care had associated costs of £14 728 in LYOL, compared with £18 558 for those dying without. Savings more than balanced the costs of introducing the service. Average bed days per patient in LYOL were reduced (19.4 vs 25.7) also intensive care unit bed days (1.1 vs 1.8). Despite this, time from first admission in LYOL to death was similar in both groups (6 months for the specialist palliative care group vs 5 for those not referred). Conclusions We have produced a template business case for an ‘ideal’ advanced liver disease support service, which self-funds and saves many bed days. The model can be easily adapted for local use in other trusts. We describe the methodology for calculating patient-level costs and the required service size. We present a financially compelling argument to expand a service to meet a growing need.","PeriodicalId":46937,"journal":{"name":"Frontline Gastroenterology","volume":"75 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontline Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2023-102530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Liver disease deaths are rising, but specialist palliative care services for hepatology are limited. Expansion across the NHS is required. Methods We surveyed clinicians, patients and carers to design an ‘ideal’ service. Using standard NHS tariffs, we calculated the cost of this service. In hospitals where specialist palliative care was available for liver disease, patient-level costs and bed utilisation in last year of life (LYOL) were compared between those seen by specialist palliative care before death and those not. Results The ‘ideal’ service was described. Costs were calculated as whole time equivalent for a minimal service, which could be scaled up. From a hospital with an existing service, patients seen by specialist palliative care had associated costs of £14 728 in LYOL, compared with £18 558 for those dying without. Savings more than balanced the costs of introducing the service. Average bed days per patient in LYOL were reduced (19.4 vs 25.7) also intensive care unit bed days (1.1 vs 1.8). Despite this, time from first admission in LYOL to death was similar in both groups (6 months for the specialist palliative care group vs 5 for those not referred). Conclusions We have produced a template business case for an ‘ideal’ advanced liver disease support service, which self-funds and saves many bed days. The model can be easily adapted for local use in other trusts. We describe the methodology for calculating patient-level costs and the required service size. We present a financially compelling argument to expand a service to meet a growing need.
为晚期慢性肝病支持服务开发通用商业案例
肝病死亡人数正在上升,但肝病专科姑息治疗服务有限。全国医疗服务体系的扩张是必要的。方法对临床医生、患者和护理人员进行调查,设计一种“理想”的服务。使用标准的NHS关税,我们计算了这项服务的成本。在提供肝病专科姑息治疗的医院中,比较了临终前接受专科姑息治疗的患者和未接受专科姑息治疗的患者在生命最后一年(LYOL)的患者水平成本和病床利用率。结果对“理想”服务进行了描述。成本是按最小服务的总时间等价物计算的,可以按比例扩大。从现有服务的医院来看,接受专科姑息治疗的患者在LYOL方面的相关费用为14,728英镑,而没有接受姑息治疗的患者则为18,558英镑。节省下来的钱超过了引入这项服务的成本。每位LYOL患者的平均住院天数减少(19.4 vs 25.7),重症监护病房的住院天数减少(1.1 vs 1.8)。尽管如此,从LYOL首次入院到死亡的时间在两组中相似(专科姑息治疗组为6个月,而非转诊组为5个月)。结论:我们已经为“理想的”晚期肝病支持服务提供了一个模板商业案例,该服务可以自我资助并节省许多住院天数。该模型可以很容易地适用于其他信托机构的本地使用。我们描述了计算患者水平成本和所需服务规模的方法。我们提出了一个经济上令人信服的论点来扩展服务以满足日益增长的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontline Gastroenterology
Frontline Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles that accelerate adoption of innovative and best practice in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. Frontline Gastroenterology is especially interested in articles on multidisciplinary research and care, focusing on both retrospective assessments of novel models of care as well as putative future directions of best practice. Specifically Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles in the domains of clinical quality, patient experience, service provision and medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信