A New, Effective, Safe, and Accurate Method of Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block

Seung Jun Jeong, Sung Jin Kim
{"title":"A New, Effective, Safe, and Accurate Method of Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block","authors":"Seung Jun Jeong, Sung Jin Kim","doi":"10.21129/nerve.2023.00423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Cervical selective nerve root block (SNRB) is an effective procedure that has long been performed for patients with radiating pain or paresthesia. However, there are several delicate structures around the cervical nerve root, damage to which could lead to irreversible neurovascular injury. Therefore, cervical SNRB requires a high skill level and extensive experience to execute it safely. To overcome these disadvantages, we used biplane computed tomography (CT)-guided fluoroscopy and a needle guidance program to achieve symptom improvement in a safer and shorter procedure. This study aimed to investigate the new method and report on its excellent clinical effects. Methods A total of 57 patients who experienced radiating pain due to cervical spinal stenosis resulting from a herniated disc were enrolled. From September 2020 to September 2021 subjects underwent a biplane CT-guided fluoroscopic nerve block at an outpatient clinic. All procedures were performed by biplane CT-guided fluoroscopy. We analyzed treatment effects with a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 2 and 4 weeks after the procedure. Logistic regression was performed to reveal the significance of changes in NRS after the injection. Results Pain improved in 56 of 57 patients (98%) after 2 and 4 weeks of follow-up compared to pre-injection pain. At the 2-week follow-up, the mean reduction based on NRS scores was 3.226 (2.782-3.674, 0; 95% confidence interval [CI], p < 0.001) indicating a 48% decrease in pain scores compared with the initial NRS. The mean reduction in NRS 4 weeks after the procedure was 3.544 (3.090-3.998, 0; 95% CI, p < 0.001) indicating a 52% reduction compared with the initial NRS. The average duration of the procedure was 4 minutes. Conclusion We demonstrate a clinically effective, safe, and accurate method using a biplane CT-guided fluoroscopy and needle guide program. This new method can be an easy and relatively uncomplicated alternative to treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy and provides safe and accurate targeting, making it easy for inexperienced surgeons. Key words: Fluoroscopy; Nerve block; Radiculopathy","PeriodicalId":229172,"journal":{"name":"The Nerve","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2023.00423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Cervical selective nerve root block (SNRB) is an effective procedure that has long been performed for patients with radiating pain or paresthesia. However, there are several delicate structures around the cervical nerve root, damage to which could lead to irreversible neurovascular injury. Therefore, cervical SNRB requires a high skill level and extensive experience to execute it safely. To overcome these disadvantages, we used biplane computed tomography (CT)-guided fluoroscopy and a needle guidance program to achieve symptom improvement in a safer and shorter procedure. This study aimed to investigate the new method and report on its excellent clinical effects. Methods A total of 57 patients who experienced radiating pain due to cervical spinal stenosis resulting from a herniated disc were enrolled. From September 2020 to September 2021 subjects underwent a biplane CT-guided fluoroscopic nerve block at an outpatient clinic. All procedures were performed by biplane CT-guided fluoroscopy. We analyzed treatment effects with a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 2 and 4 weeks after the procedure. Logistic regression was performed to reveal the significance of changes in NRS after the injection. Results Pain improved in 56 of 57 patients (98%) after 2 and 4 weeks of follow-up compared to pre-injection pain. At the 2-week follow-up, the mean reduction based on NRS scores was 3.226 (2.782-3.674, 0; 95% confidence interval [CI], p < 0.001) indicating a 48% decrease in pain scores compared with the initial NRS. The mean reduction in NRS 4 weeks after the procedure was 3.544 (3.090-3.998, 0; 95% CI, p < 0.001) indicating a 52% reduction compared with the initial NRS. The average duration of the procedure was 4 minutes. Conclusion We demonstrate a clinically effective, safe, and accurate method using a biplane CT-guided fluoroscopy and needle guide program. This new method can be an easy and relatively uncomplicated alternative to treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy and provides safe and accurate targeting, making it easy for inexperienced surgeons. Key words: Fluoroscopy; Nerve block; Radiculopathy
一种有效、安全、准确的颈椎选择性神经根阻滞新方法
目的颈椎选择性神经根阻滞(SNRB)是治疗放射性疼痛或感觉异常的有效方法。然而,颈神经根周围有几个脆弱的结构,其损伤可能导致不可逆的神经血管损伤。因此,颈椎SNRB需要高水平的技术和丰富的经验才能安全实施。为了克服这些缺点,我们使用双翼计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下的透视检查和针引导程序,以更安全和更短的程序实现症状改善。本研究旨在探讨新方法,并报道其良好的临床效果。方法选取57例因椎间盘突出导致的颈椎管狭窄引起放射性疼痛的患者。从2020年9月到2021年9月,受试者在门诊接受了双翼ct引导下的透视神经阻滞。所有手术均在双翼ct引导下进行。我们在手术后2周和4周用数值评定量表(NRS)分析治疗效果。Logistic回归分析注射后NRS变化的意义。结果与注射前疼痛相比,57例患者中56例(98%)在随访2周和4周后疼痛得到改善。在2周的随访中,基于NRS评分的平均下降为3.226 (2.782-3.674,0;95%可信区间[CI], p < 0.001)表明与初始NRS相比,疼痛评分降低了48%。术后4周NRS平均降低3.544 (3.090-3.998,0;95% CI, p < 0.001)表明与初始NRS相比降低了52%。手术的平均时间为4分钟。结论我们展示了一种临床有效、安全、准确的方法,使用双翼ct引导的透视和针导程序。这种新方法对于颈椎神经根病患者来说是一种简单且相对简单的替代治疗方法,并且提供了安全准确的靶向治疗,使缺乏经验的外科医生更容易使用。关键词:透视;神经阻滞;神经根病
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信