Jessica Williams, Rhyse Bendell, Stephen Fiore, Florian Jentsch
{"title":"Artificial Social Intelligence in Action: Lessons Learned from Human-Agent Hybrid Search and Rescue","authors":"Jessica Williams, Rhyse Bendell, Stephen Fiore, Florian Jentsch","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Socially intelligent artificial agents have recently shown some evidence of improving team performance when advising human teammates during the execution of time-pressured, complex missions. These agents, imbued with a form of social intelligence supported by Artificial Theory of Mind, have also demonstrated some negative outcomes associated with their approaches to delivering advice and motivating teammates to succeed. Here, we closely examine team performance outcomes associated with a simulated team Urban Search and Rescue mission in the context of interventions delivered by artificial socially intelligent agents that served as advisors to the human teammates engaged in task execution. The task studied here required some individual taskwork effectiveness as well as a notable amount of interdependent teamwork coordination. The interdependent activities provided the advising artificially intelligent teammates an opportunity to observe and intervene to improve aspects of team process. Some of the interventions delivered by the socially intelligent agents were found to positively impact performance, notably those that targeted objective data and the dissemination of information to the right individual at appropriate timepoints; however, other interventions negatively impacted team outcomes. Results showed that Motivation interventions aimed solely at bolstering the motivation of team members did not yield positive outcomes; in fact, they were found to have adverse effects on overall team performance and task execution.","PeriodicalId":470195,"journal":{"name":"AHFE international","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHFE international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Socially intelligent artificial agents have recently shown some evidence of improving team performance when advising human teammates during the execution of time-pressured, complex missions. These agents, imbued with a form of social intelligence supported by Artificial Theory of Mind, have also demonstrated some negative outcomes associated with their approaches to delivering advice and motivating teammates to succeed. Here, we closely examine team performance outcomes associated with a simulated team Urban Search and Rescue mission in the context of interventions delivered by artificial socially intelligent agents that served as advisors to the human teammates engaged in task execution. The task studied here required some individual taskwork effectiveness as well as a notable amount of interdependent teamwork coordination. The interdependent activities provided the advising artificially intelligent teammates an opportunity to observe and intervene to improve aspects of team process. Some of the interventions delivered by the socially intelligent agents were found to positively impact performance, notably those that targeted objective data and the dissemination of information to the right individual at appropriate timepoints; however, other interventions negatively impacted team outcomes. Results showed that Motivation interventions aimed solely at bolstering the motivation of team members did not yield positive outcomes; in fact, they were found to have adverse effects on overall team performance and task execution.
在执行时间紧迫、复杂的任务时,社会智能人工智能代理在为人类队友提供建议时,最近显示出一些改善团队绩效的证据。这些被人工心智理论(Artificial Theory of Mind)所支持的社会智能所渗透的代理人,在提供建议和激励队友取得成功的方法上也表现出了一些负面的结果。在这里,我们仔细研究了与模拟团队城市搜索和救援任务相关的团队绩效结果,在人工社会智能代理提供干预的背景下,人工社会智能代理作为参与任务执行的人类队友的顾问。这里研究的任务需要一些个人任务效率,以及大量的相互依赖的团队协调。相互依赖的活动为提供建议的人工智能团队成员提供了观察和干预的机会,以改进团队过程的各个方面。社会智能代理提供的一些干预措施被发现对绩效有积极影响,特别是那些针对客观数据和在适当的时间点向正确的个人传播信息的干预措施;然而,其他干预措施会对团队结果产生负面影响。结果表明,仅以增强团队成员的动机为目的的动机干预并没有产生积极的结果;事实上,他们被发现对整体团队绩效和任务执行有不利影响。