Scientific Quality and Reliability Analysis of Turkish YouTube Videos on Cancer and Nutrition

Elif Şahin
{"title":"Scientific Quality and Reliability Analysis of Turkish YouTube Videos on Cancer and Nutrition","authors":"Elif Şahin","doi":"10.14744/ejma.2023.70298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: YouTube, boasting an expansive number of users, is one of the primary sources of video-based educational content worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the content of YouTube videos about cancer and nutrition. Methods: In this cross-sectional register-based study, popular videos on YouTube about the following keywords were evaluated; “cancer and nutrition”, \"nutrition in cancer patients\", \"chemotherapy nutrition\", \"nutrition in chemotherapy\", and \"nutrition after chemotherapy\". and reliability of video content were measured using the Global Quality Score (GQS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool. Results: A total of 136 videos were analyzed in the study. The median duration was 157 (30-2960) seconds and the median number of views was 1232.5 (9-1238570). Median viewing rate was 1.06 (0–732). Among the video publishers, television (TV) health programs were the most (n=42, 31%). Regarding the video category, the most (n=121, 89%) popular was informative videos for patients. In most of the videos, the narrators were non-oncology clinicians (n=41, 30%) and dietitians (n=40, 29%). Mean GQS, JAMA, mDISCERN scores were 2.25±0.95 (fair-poor quality), 1.65±1.89 (fair-poor quality), and 1.96±1.13 (poor quality), respectively. A positive correlation was found between the 3 scoring points (p<0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). There was a negative correlation between video age, duration and all of the quality scores. There was a significant difference between video quality scores according to video categories, publishers and narrators (p<0.001 for each). Conclusion: Patients and individuals who are curious about relationship between nutrition and cancer to access accurate information, individuals should be directed to the right resources. Making oncologists more visible in this field by receiving professional support and can help higher quality videos reach the public.","PeriodicalId":483994,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medical Advances","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medical Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejma.2023.70298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: YouTube, boasting an expansive number of users, is one of the primary sources of video-based educational content worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the content of YouTube videos about cancer and nutrition. Methods: In this cross-sectional register-based study, popular videos on YouTube about the following keywords were evaluated; “cancer and nutrition”, "nutrition in cancer patients", "chemotherapy nutrition", "nutrition in chemotherapy", and "nutrition after chemotherapy". and reliability of video content were measured using the Global Quality Score (GQS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool. Results: A total of 136 videos were analyzed in the study. The median duration was 157 (30-2960) seconds and the median number of views was 1232.5 (9-1238570). Median viewing rate was 1.06 (0–732). Among the video publishers, television (TV) health programs were the most (n=42, 31%). Regarding the video category, the most (n=121, 89%) popular was informative videos for patients. In most of the videos, the narrators were non-oncology clinicians (n=41, 30%) and dietitians (n=40, 29%). Mean GQS, JAMA, mDISCERN scores were 2.25±0.95 (fair-poor quality), 1.65±1.89 (fair-poor quality), and 1.96±1.13 (poor quality), respectively. A positive correlation was found between the 3 scoring points (p<0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). There was a negative correlation between video age, duration and all of the quality scores. There was a significant difference between video quality scores according to video categories, publishers and narrators (p<0.001 for each). Conclusion: Patients and individuals who are curious about relationship between nutrition and cancer to access accurate information, individuals should be directed to the right resources. Making oncologists more visible in this field by receiving professional support and can help higher quality videos reach the public.
土耳其YouTube关于癌症和营养视频的科学质量和可靠性分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信