Reestimating Brazil’s GDP growth from 1900 to 1980

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Edmar L. Bacha, Guilherme A. Tombolo, Flávio R. Versiani
{"title":"Reestimating Brazil’s GDP growth from 1900 to 1980","authors":"Edmar L. Bacha, Guilherme A. Tombolo, Flávio R. Versiani","doi":"10.5935/0034-7140.20230013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present evidence of overestimation of Brazil’s GDP growth both by the Getulio Vargas Foundation from 1947 to 1980 and by Claudio Haddad from 1900 to 1947. The main reason is selection bias in favor of higher-growth goods-producing activities to the detriment of Keywordsslower-growing service activities. We develop and apply methods to include such services in the real output series. As a result, we suggest haircuts that reduce the GDP yearly growth rate from 7.4% to 6.2% in the 1947-1980 period and from 4.4% to 4.0% in the 1900-1947 period. For the whole 1900-1980 period, our suggested haircuts reduce the GDP yearly growth rate from 5.7% to 4.9%. JEL Codes N16, O11, O47, O54","PeriodicalId":52490,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Economia","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7140.20230013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We present evidence of overestimation of Brazil’s GDP growth both by the Getulio Vargas Foundation from 1947 to 1980 and by Claudio Haddad from 1900 to 1947. The main reason is selection bias in favor of higher-growth goods-producing activities to the detriment of Keywordsslower-growing service activities. We develop and apply methods to include such services in the real output series. As a result, we suggest haircuts that reduce the GDP yearly growth rate from 7.4% to 6.2% in the 1947-1980 period and from 4.4% to 4.0% in the 1900-1947 period. For the whole 1900-1980 period, our suggested haircuts reduce the GDP yearly growth rate from 5.7% to 4.9%. JEL Codes N16, O11, O47, O54
重新估计巴西1900年至1980年的GDP增长
我们提出了格图里奥·巴尔加斯基金会(Getulio Vargas Foundation)和克劳迪奥·哈达德(Claudio Haddad)分别在1947年至1980年和1900年至1947年高估巴西GDP增长的证据。主要原因是选择偏向于高增长的商品生产活动,而不利于增长较慢的服务活动。我们开发并应用了将这些服务包含在实际输出序列中的方法。因此,我们建议将1947-1980年期间的GDP年增长率从7.4%降至6.2%,1900-1947年期间的GDP年增长率从4.4%降至4.0%。在整个1900-1980年期间,我们建议的减记将GDP年增长率从5.7%降至4.9%。JEL代码N16, O11, O47, O54
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Economia
Revista Brasileira de Economia Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Brasileira de Economia (RBE) é a mais antiga publicação de Economia do Brasil, e a segunda mais antiga da América Latina. Seus fundadores foram Arizio de Viana, o primeiro editor, e Eugênio Gudin, um dos mais influentes economistas da história brasileira. A RBE foi apresentada no seu primeiro número pelo professor Luiz Simões Lopes, em uma Introdução que poderia constar ainda hoje de qualquer número da revista.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信