A Typological Look into Learning Cultures in Workplaces: From Malicious to Demanding

Saeid Safaei Movahhed
{"title":"A Typological Look into Learning Cultures in Workplaces: From Malicious to Demanding","authors":"Saeid Safaei Movahhed","doi":"10.5539/jel.v12n6p126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at identifying learning cultures in various workplaces thorough an emergent grounded theory study. To gather data, in-depth interviews were conducted on 127 employees of small to large companies to reach a vast breadth and depth of data. For the purpose of inclusiveness, a maximum variation strategy was adopted for sampling to select participants purposively from manufacturing, knowledge-based, business and service companies. The data were thematically analyzed at two levels, namely initial and secondary coding. To establish credibility, three dominant strategies were continuously used as member check, peer debriefing and external auditing. Consequently, a tripartite typology emerged to represent learning cultures in various enterprises based on three criteria: management approach, peers' reaction, promotion expectancy. To sum up, in the malicious learning culture, bad working habits are learnt and shared by staff and commitment to work is gradually minimized to the lowest possible. In the deterministic learning culture, a neutral learning climate dominates the workplace as staff perceive no link between self-development and job promotion. Finally, in the demanding learning culture people may clearly view sensible links between competency development and job promotion, so they try their utmost to keep up with the latest developments in their field to avert the risk of demotion or job loss. The study suggests that if enterprises plan to achieve and keep a competitive edge, they should focus firmly on creating a demanding workplace learning culture.","PeriodicalId":31543,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Education Teaching and Learning","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Education Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n6p126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed at identifying learning cultures in various workplaces thorough an emergent grounded theory study. To gather data, in-depth interviews were conducted on 127 employees of small to large companies to reach a vast breadth and depth of data. For the purpose of inclusiveness, a maximum variation strategy was adopted for sampling to select participants purposively from manufacturing, knowledge-based, business and service companies. The data were thematically analyzed at two levels, namely initial and secondary coding. To establish credibility, three dominant strategies were continuously used as member check, peer debriefing and external auditing. Consequently, a tripartite typology emerged to represent learning cultures in various enterprises based on three criteria: management approach, peers' reaction, promotion expectancy. To sum up, in the malicious learning culture, bad working habits are learnt and shared by staff and commitment to work is gradually minimized to the lowest possible. In the deterministic learning culture, a neutral learning climate dominates the workplace as staff perceive no link between self-development and job promotion. Finally, in the demanding learning culture people may clearly view sensible links between competency development and job promotion, so they try their utmost to keep up with the latest developments in their field to avert the risk of demotion or job loss. The study suggests that if enterprises plan to achieve and keep a competitive edge, they should focus firmly on creating a demanding workplace learning culture.
职场学习文化的类型学研究:从恶意到苛刻
本研究旨在通过一个新兴的扎根理论研究来识别不同工作场所的学习文化。为了收集数据,我们对127名小到大公司的员工进行了深度访谈,以获得广泛而深度的数据。为了提高包容性,采用最大变异策略进行抽样,有目的地从制造业、知识型、商业和服务型企业中选择参与者。在初始编码和二次编码两个层面对数据进行了主题分析。为了建立可信性,持续使用三种主导策略:成员检查、同行询问和外部审计。因此,基于三个标准,出现了一个三方类型来代表各种企业的学习文化:管理方法,同伴& #39;反应,晋升期望。综上所述,在恶意学习文化中,不良的工作习惯被员工学习和分享,对工作的承诺逐渐降到最低。在确定性学习文化中,中性的学习氛围主导着工作场所,员工认为自我发展与工作晋升之间没有联系。最后,在要求苛刻的学习文化中,人们可以清楚地看到能力发展和工作晋升之间的合理联系,所以他们尽最大努力跟上他们所在领域的最新发展,以避免降级或失业的风险。该研究表明,如果企业计划获得并保持竞争优势,他们应该坚定地专注于创造一种苛刻的工作场所学习文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信