Promoting Human Rights standards for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people from the perspective of International law

Thomas Edison, Chen Liu, Tom Hank
{"title":"Promoting Human Rights standards for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people from the perspective of International law","authors":"Thomas Edison, Chen Liu, Tom Hank","doi":"10.59653/ijmars.v1i01.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the issue of how various religious and legal systems cope with current developments that weaken the binary opposition of men and women including their definitions of sexual identity and culture. More concretely, this book tries to explain how society and concrete laws deal with claims of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexual (LGBT) who claim wider recognition. This explains the difference between the Western provisions and the policies of relevant legal bodies such as the General Assembly of the United Nations, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Supreme Court regarding this matter. This also shows the nature and real impact of international civil society forces such as the Yogyakarta principle which formulates the expansion of rights regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexuals. Based on a comparison of various legal and religious discourses, he describes the current practice of direct and indirect discrimination and in some non-European national systems even extrajudicial killings, torture and ill-treatment, sexual assault, rape, and other human rights violations. While emphasizing the substantial differences between current European countries and non-European countries regarding policies towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT), it points to the current trend of progress in the field by the general policy of the European Council, the most recent assessment issued by the European Court of Human Rights as well as civil society efforts such as the Yogyakarta principle. Swedish standards have been introduced to emphasize existing progressive attitudes towards LGBT people regarding gay marriage and adoption procedures.","PeriodicalId":470181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v1i01.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines the issue of how various religious and legal systems cope with current developments that weaken the binary opposition of men and women including their definitions of sexual identity and culture. More concretely, this book tries to explain how society and concrete laws deal with claims of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexual (LGBT) who claim wider recognition. This explains the difference between the Western provisions and the policies of relevant legal bodies such as the General Assembly of the United Nations, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Supreme Court regarding this matter. This also shows the nature and real impact of international civil society forces such as the Yogyakarta principle which formulates the expansion of rights regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexuals. Based on a comparison of various legal and religious discourses, he describes the current practice of direct and indirect discrimination and in some non-European national systems even extrajudicial killings, torture and ill-treatment, sexual assault, rape, and other human rights violations. While emphasizing the substantial differences between current European countries and non-European countries regarding policies towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT), it points to the current trend of progress in the field by the general policy of the European Council, the most recent assessment issued by the European Court of Human Rights as well as civil society efforts such as the Yogyakarta principle. Swedish standards have been introduced to emphasize existing progressive attitudes towards LGBT people regarding gay marriage and adoption procedures.
从国际法的角度促进男女同性恋、双性恋和变性人的人权标准
本文探讨了各种宗教和法律制度如何应对当前的发展,这些发展削弱了男女二元对立,包括他们对性别身份和文化的定义。更具体地说,这本书试图解释社会和具体法律如何处理女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人(LGBT)的主张,他们要求得到更广泛的认可。这解释了西方的规定与联合国大会、欧洲人权法院和最高法院等有关法律机构在这一问题上的政策之间的差异。这也显示了国际民间社会力量的性质和实际影响,如日惹原则,该原则规定了扩大男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者的权利。在对各种法律和宗教话语进行比较的基础上,他描述了目前直接和间接歧视的做法,以及在一些非欧洲国家系统中甚至是法外杀戮、酷刑和虐待、性侵犯、强奸和其他侵犯人权的行为。在强调当前欧洲国家和非欧洲国家在对待女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人(LGBT)的政策上的实质性差异的同时,它指出了欧洲理事会的总体政策、欧洲人权法院发布的最新评估以及日惹原则等民间社会努力在该领域取得进展的当前趋势。瑞典标准的引入是为了强调在同性恋婚姻和收养程序方面对LGBT人群现有的进步态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信