GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND GUT PROMOTING ACTIVITY OF THREE CONVENTIONAL FIBRE FEEDSTUFFS IN DIETS OF GROWING PIGS

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Esther O. Towoju, Maxwell A. Adeyemi, Emmanuel O. Akinfala
{"title":"GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND GUT PROMOTING ACTIVITY OF THREE CONVENTIONAL FIBRE FEEDSTUFFS IN DIETS OF GROWING PIGS","authors":"Esther O. Towoju, Maxwell A. Adeyemi, Emmanuel O. Akinfala","doi":"10.56369/tsaes.4809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background.</strong> The increasing utilisation of fibre feedstuffs in diets of pigs nowadays calls for concerns not only on the growth but also the health status of the animals and the possibility to eradicate the use of in-feed antibiotics for pigs. <strong>Objective.</strong> To evaluate the growth performance and gut promoting activity of three fibre feedstuffs (Palm kernel cake (PKC), Brewers’ dried grain (BDG) and Wheat offal (WO)) in diets of growing pigs. <strong>Methodology</strong>. Three dietary treatments containing 40 % each of PKC, BDG and WO were randomly allotted to 24 growing crossbred (Large White x Hampshire) pigs of average initial weight of 30± 0.50 Kg in an 82 d feeding trial. <strong>Results.</strong> There was an influence (p&amp;lt;0.05) of sources of fibre feedstuffs for the arabinoxylan- and mannan-oligosaccharide concentrations of the dietary treatments with BDG having comparatively higher values than WO and PKC diets. The short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations and pH of gut digesta were different (p&amp;lt;0.05) across dietary groups with pigs fed BDG diet having higher SCFA concentration in the foregut and hindgut. In the gut flora, BDG and WO promoted the highest (p&amp;lt;0.05) <em>Lactobacillus</em> population in the small and large intestines respectively. There were significant (p&amp;lt;0.05) effects of fibre sources on the final weight, average daily gain and daily intake of pigs fed the different treatments with those fed WO diets showing superior performance over pigs fed either PKC or BDG diet. <strong>Implication. </strong>The WO diet promoted the fastest growth and better gut effects but BDG resulted in the most efficient feed to gain conversion. <strong>Conclusion.</strong> All the diets exhibited prebiotic activity, enhanced the growth of beneficial bacterial in the gut and could reduce the use of in-feed antibiotics for pigs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23259,"journal":{"name":"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems","volume":"226 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The increasing utilisation of fibre feedstuffs in diets of pigs nowadays calls for concerns not only on the growth but also the health status of the animals and the possibility to eradicate the use of in-feed antibiotics for pigs. Objective. To evaluate the growth performance and gut promoting activity of three fibre feedstuffs (Palm kernel cake (PKC), Brewers’ dried grain (BDG) and Wheat offal (WO)) in diets of growing pigs. Methodology. Three dietary treatments containing 40 % each of PKC, BDG and WO were randomly allotted to 24 growing crossbred (Large White x Hampshire) pigs of average initial weight of 30± 0.50 Kg in an 82 d feeding trial. Results. There was an influence (p&lt;0.05) of sources of fibre feedstuffs for the arabinoxylan- and mannan-oligosaccharide concentrations of the dietary treatments with BDG having comparatively higher values than WO and PKC diets. The short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations and pH of gut digesta were different (p&lt;0.05) across dietary groups with pigs fed BDG diet having higher SCFA concentration in the foregut and hindgut. In the gut flora, BDG and WO promoted the highest (p&lt;0.05) Lactobacillus population in the small and large intestines respectively. There were significant (p&lt;0.05) effects of fibre sources on the final weight, average daily gain and daily intake of pigs fed the different treatments with those fed WO diets showing superior performance over pigs fed either PKC or BDG diet. Implication. The WO diet promoted the fastest growth and better gut effects but BDG resulted in the most efficient feed to gain conversion. Conclusion. All the diets exhibited prebiotic activity, enhanced the growth of beneficial bacterial in the gut and could reduce the use of in-feed antibiotics for pigs.

3种常规纤维饲料对生长猪生长性能和促肠活性的影响
& lt; p> & lt; strong>背景。;/ strong>随着猪日粮中纤维饲料的使用越来越多,人们不仅要关注猪的生长,还要关注动物的健康状况,以及消除猪饲料中抗生素使用的可能性。& lt; strong>客观灵活;/ strong>目的评价棕榈仁饼(PKC)、啤酒干粒(BDG)和小麦内脏(WO) 3种纤维饲料在生长猪饲粮中的生长性能和促肠活性。& lt; strong> Methodology< / strong>。选取24头平均初始体重为30±0.50 Kg的杂交(大白×汉普)猪,随机分配3种饲粮中PKC、BDG和WO各占40%的处理,进行82 d的饲养试验。& lt; strong>结果。;/ strong>纤维饲料来源对日粮处理阿拉伯木聚糖和甘露聚糖浓度有影响(p<0.05), BDG值高于WO和PKC饲粮。不同饲粮组猪肠道食糜短链脂肪酸(SCFA)浓度和pH值存在差异(p > 0.05;lt;0.05),饲喂BDG饲粮的猪前肠和后肠短链脂肪酸浓度较高。在肠道菌群中,BDG和WO对乳酸菌群的促进作用最高(p<0.05) <em>分别分布在小肠和大肠中。纤维源对饲喂不同处理的猪的末重、平均日增重和日采食量有显著影响(p<0.05),其中饲喂WO的猪的生产性能优于饲喂PKC或BDG的猪。& lt; strong>暗示。低氮饲粮促进了最快的生长和更好的肠道效应,但BDG的料重转换效率最高。& lt; strong>结论。;/ strong>所有饲粮均表现出益生元活性,促进了肠道有益菌的生长,并可减少猪饲料中抗生素的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is an international peer-reviewed publication devoted to disseminate original information contributing to the understanding and development of agroecosystems in tropical and subtropical areas. The Journal recognizes the multidisciplinary nature of its scope and encourages the submission of original manuscripts from all of the disciplines involved in this area. Original contributions are welcomed in relation to the study of particular components of the agroecosystems (i.e. plant, animal, soil) as well as the resulting interactions and their relationship/impact on society and environment. The journal does not received manuscripts based solely on economic acpects o food technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信