{"title":"Theories of Emotion: Expressing, Feeling, Acting by Pia CAMPEGGIANI (review)","authors":"Sabrina B. Little","doi":"10.1353/rvm.2023.a906815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Theories of Emotion: Expressing, Feeling, Acting by Pia CAMPEGGIANI Sabrina B. Little CAMPEGGIANI, Pia. Theories of Emotion: Expressing, Feeling, Acting. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023. xiv + 199 pp. Cloth, $80.89; paper, $21.60 In Theories of Emotion, Pia Campeggiani provides a philosophical introduction to the emotions. The book is multidisciplinary and empirically informed. It is organized around three “groundbreaking intuitions” of emotion theory—(1) expression, (2) subjectivity, and (3) action. Each section corresponds to a different thinker—Charles Darwin, William James, and John Dewey, respectively—and each section concludes with a discussion of relevant debates. This book is outstanding. It is clearly written, well organized, and impressive in its scope. In what follows, I outline key ideas and raise questions generated by each section, then conclude with general reflections on the text. Campeggiani begins with the “scandal” of emotion research: There is no agreement about what an emotion is. In part, this lack of consensus is due to the imprecise ways we employ concepts like feelings, emotions, affect, and passions in ordinary discourse. In part, it is due to empirical difficulties. For example, Campeggiani describes how implicit assumptions and a forced-choice format compromised an experiment about expression universality. Additionally, Campeggiani points out that the category “emotions” has an internal structure that lacks clear-cut boundaries. There are paradigmatic examples of emotions, such as fear and anger, but there are also ambiguous phenomena, such as respect and modesty, which we may or may not recognize as such. Throughout the text, Campeggiani introduces and evaluates numerous accounts of emotions, drawing our attention to the strengths, limitations, and empirical adequacy of each. Part 1 begins with Charles Darwin’s contributions to emotion theory—an emphasis on the biological origins of emotions and a focus on expression. This section examines emotions in connection to adaptive fitness, exploring phenomena such as blushing when we are ashamed and the biological bases of emotions. A highlight of this section is an exploration of the social or communicative character of the emotions, which Darwin described as “only a secondary effect” of expression. Campeggiani examines emotional contagion and imitation, as well as the [End Page 141] phenomenon of feeling more pain when we express pain on our faces. There is also a rich discussion about constructionism as an alternative to basic emotions theory. Part 2 opens with William James on subjective experience. Campeggiani describes the limitations of James’s position—of understanding emotions to be reducible to feelings. For starters, this position is not empirically well supported. Campeggiani cites Walter Cannon’s observation that “many of the autonomic changes that are symptomatic of a given emotion can also occur in its absence.” Additionally, James fails to “properly flesh out the link between emotions and evaluations.” Campeggiani then describes the cognitive turn in emotion theory that emerged in response to the lack of attention paid to evaluation. Cognitive accounts of emotion deemphasize the bodily dimensions of emotional experiences in favor of the intentional properties, or “aboutness,” of emotions. Emotions see things as things. From my vantage, this was the best part of the book. Campeggiani highlights Damasio’s point that decision-making depends on having a “correct affective perception of the values at stake in a given situation.” For instance, feeling outsized or misdirected fear may undermine our decision-making. Campeggiani also introduces debates about whether emotions are appraisals, and whether emotions entail judgments or make judgments more likely. In the introduction, she mentions that “decision-making processes are always and inevitably underpinned by emotions, for good and for ill.” We see what she means in this section. Emotions participate in reason, impede reason, and have cognitive content themselves. That emotions involve or participate in our judgments raises two kinds of concerns—epistemic and normative. The epistemic worry is that inaccurate appraisals may undermine our understanding of the world. This is especially worrisome for the class of emotions Campeggiani calls “recalcitrant,” or closed off to other mental states, and for the emotions she says are “heavily influenced by our needs and goals.” Emotions are imperfectly truth-tracking, as was made clear earlier, in part 1, regarding their adaptive nature. The normative worry is that certain emotional...","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rvm.2023.a906815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reviewed by: Theories of Emotion: Expressing, Feeling, Acting by Pia CAMPEGGIANI Sabrina B. Little CAMPEGGIANI, Pia. Theories of Emotion: Expressing, Feeling, Acting. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023. xiv + 199 pp. Cloth, $80.89; paper, $21.60 In Theories of Emotion, Pia Campeggiani provides a philosophical introduction to the emotions. The book is multidisciplinary and empirically informed. It is organized around three “groundbreaking intuitions” of emotion theory—(1) expression, (2) subjectivity, and (3) action. Each section corresponds to a different thinker—Charles Darwin, William James, and John Dewey, respectively—and each section concludes with a discussion of relevant debates. This book is outstanding. It is clearly written, well organized, and impressive in its scope. In what follows, I outline key ideas and raise questions generated by each section, then conclude with general reflections on the text. Campeggiani begins with the “scandal” of emotion research: There is no agreement about what an emotion is. In part, this lack of consensus is due to the imprecise ways we employ concepts like feelings, emotions, affect, and passions in ordinary discourse. In part, it is due to empirical difficulties. For example, Campeggiani describes how implicit assumptions and a forced-choice format compromised an experiment about expression universality. Additionally, Campeggiani points out that the category “emotions” has an internal structure that lacks clear-cut boundaries. There are paradigmatic examples of emotions, such as fear and anger, but there are also ambiguous phenomena, such as respect and modesty, which we may or may not recognize as such. Throughout the text, Campeggiani introduces and evaluates numerous accounts of emotions, drawing our attention to the strengths, limitations, and empirical adequacy of each. Part 1 begins with Charles Darwin’s contributions to emotion theory—an emphasis on the biological origins of emotions and a focus on expression. This section examines emotions in connection to adaptive fitness, exploring phenomena such as blushing when we are ashamed and the biological bases of emotions. A highlight of this section is an exploration of the social or communicative character of the emotions, which Darwin described as “only a secondary effect” of expression. Campeggiani examines emotional contagion and imitation, as well as the [End Page 141] phenomenon of feeling more pain when we express pain on our faces. There is also a rich discussion about constructionism as an alternative to basic emotions theory. Part 2 opens with William James on subjective experience. Campeggiani describes the limitations of James’s position—of understanding emotions to be reducible to feelings. For starters, this position is not empirically well supported. Campeggiani cites Walter Cannon’s observation that “many of the autonomic changes that are symptomatic of a given emotion can also occur in its absence.” Additionally, James fails to “properly flesh out the link between emotions and evaluations.” Campeggiani then describes the cognitive turn in emotion theory that emerged in response to the lack of attention paid to evaluation. Cognitive accounts of emotion deemphasize the bodily dimensions of emotional experiences in favor of the intentional properties, or “aboutness,” of emotions. Emotions see things as things. From my vantage, this was the best part of the book. Campeggiani highlights Damasio’s point that decision-making depends on having a “correct affective perception of the values at stake in a given situation.” For instance, feeling outsized or misdirected fear may undermine our decision-making. Campeggiani also introduces debates about whether emotions are appraisals, and whether emotions entail judgments or make judgments more likely. In the introduction, she mentions that “decision-making processes are always and inevitably underpinned by emotions, for good and for ill.” We see what she means in this section. Emotions participate in reason, impede reason, and have cognitive content themselves. That emotions involve or participate in our judgments raises two kinds of concerns—epistemic and normative. The epistemic worry is that inaccurate appraisals may undermine our understanding of the world. This is especially worrisome for the class of emotions Campeggiani calls “recalcitrant,” or closed off to other mental states, and for the emotions she says are “heavily influenced by our needs and goals.” Emotions are imperfectly truth-tracking, as was made clear earlier, in part 1, regarding their adaptive nature. The normative worry is that certain emotional...
由:情感理论:表达,感觉,行为(Pia CAMPEGGIANI) Sabrina B. Little CAMPEGGIANI, Pia。情感理论:表达,感觉,行动。纽约:布鲁姆斯伯里出版社,2023。xiv + 199页布,80.89美元;在《情感理论》一书中,皮亚·坎佩贾尼从哲学的角度介绍了情感。这本书是多学科和经验的通知。它是围绕情感理论的三个“突破性直觉”组织起来的——(1)表达,(2)主观性,(3)行动。每个部分分别对应一位不同的思想家——查尔斯·达尔文、威廉·詹姆斯和约翰·杜威——每个部分都以对相关辩论的讨论结束。这本书很出色。它写得很清楚,组织得很好,而且它的范围令人印象深刻。在接下来的内容中,我概述了主要观点,并提出了每个部分产生的问题,然后以对文本的总体反思结束。Campeggiani从情绪研究的“丑闻”开始:关于什么是情绪,人们没有达成一致。在某种程度上,这种缺乏共识是由于我们在日常话语中使用感觉、情绪、影响和激情等概念的方式不精确。在某种程度上,这是由于经验上的困难。例如,Campeggiani描述了隐式假设和强制选择格式如何损害了关于表达普遍性的实验。此外,Campeggiani指出,“情感”这一类别的内部结构缺乏明确的界限。情感有典型的例子,如恐惧和愤怒,但也有模棱两可的现象,如尊重和谦虚,我们可能会或可能不会认识到这一点。在整个文本中,Campeggiani介绍并评估了许多关于情感的描述,提请我们注意每个人的优势,局限性和经验充分性。第一部分从查尔斯·达尔文对情感理论的贡献开始——强调情感的生物学起源和对表达的关注。本节探讨了与适应性适应性相关的情绪,探索了羞愧时脸红等现象以及情绪的生物学基础。这一节的一个亮点是对情感的社会或交流特征的探索,达尔文将其描述为表达的“次要影响”。Campeggiani研究了情绪传染和模仿,以及当我们在脸上表达痛苦时感觉更痛苦的现象。关于建构主义作为基本情绪理论的替代理论也有丰富的讨论。第二部分从威廉·詹姆斯的主观经验开始。Campeggiani描述了詹姆斯立场的局限性——将情感理解为可简化为感觉。首先,这种观点并没有得到充分的经验支持。Campeggiani引用了Walter Cannon的观察:“许多特定情绪症状的自主神经变化也可能在没有这种情绪的情况下发生。”此外,詹姆斯未能“适当地充实情绪和评估之间的联系”。Campeggiani随后描述了由于缺乏对评估的关注而出现的情绪理论的认知转向。情感的认知描述淡化了情感体验的身体维度,而倾向于情感的有意属性或“有关性”。情感把事物看成事物。从我的角度来看,这是这本书最好的部分。Campeggiani强调了达马西奥的观点,即决策取决于“在特定情况下对利害关系的价值观有正确的情感感知”。例如,感觉被夸大或被误导的恐惧可能会破坏我们的决策。Campeggiani还介绍了关于情绪是否是评价,以及情绪是否会导致判断或更有可能做出判断的争论。在引言中,她提到“决策过程总是不可避免地受到情绪的影响,无论是好是坏。”我们明白她在这部分的意思。情绪参与理性,阻碍理性,自身具有认知内容。情感涉及或参与我们的判断引发了两种担忧——认知和规范。认识论上的担忧是,不准确的评价可能会破坏我们对世界的理解。这对于Campeggiani所说的“顽固性”或与其他精神状态隔绝的情绪,以及她所说的“受我们的需求和目标严重影响”的情绪来说,尤其令人担忧。情绪是不完美的真相追踪,正如前面第1部分明确指出的,关于它们的适应性。规范性的担忧是某些情感…