Rasch Analysis of Household Waste Reduction Behavior: Case Study in Sunten Jaya, Bandung Barat Regency

Ira Endah Rohima, Astri Widiastuti Hasbiah
{"title":"Rasch Analysis of Household Waste Reduction Behavior: Case Study in Sunten Jaya, Bandung Barat Regency","authors":"Ira Endah Rohima, Astri Widiastuti Hasbiah","doi":"10.23969/jcbeem.v7i2.10383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reduction of domestic waste in developing countries is a critical issue that requires attention. Behavioural intentions of households can lead to reduce, reuse and recycle behaviour in waste management. Many factors influence the reduction of waste. Psychological and behavioural characteristics often hinder the effectiveness of technical solutions in managing household waste, so it is important to understand human behaviour to design effective policies. Rural areas also face waste problems, but they do not receive as much attention as urban areas. This research aims to identify the behavioural intentions of households to reduce waste in a small village in Bandung Barat Regency. This study uses Rasch model to measure a person's perspective in an objective way. Data for this study was collected using a questionnaire. The questions were rated on a five-point Likert scale. The number of respondents who participated in this study was 27. The small number of respondents was due to difficulties in finding respondents, as most people were farming at the time of the study. The result shows that the person’s reliability is statistically misfit, whereas the item reliability is fit. The respondent/person misfit may be because the respondents are farmers with a low level of education. The Cronbach's alpha value, which measures the interdependence between the person and the item, is 0.70. Since the item reliability is 0.95 and the person reliability is 0.62, it can be concluded that the quality of the items of the instrument is good, and the consistency of the respondents' answers is also good. Questionnaire item I8 is the most difficult question for respondents to agree with a value of +2.09 logit. On the other hand, the easiest questionnaire item to agree on is I18 with -1.74 logit. From the results it can be concluded that the respondents know about waste separation. However, they never carried out waste separation. It can be inferred that the behaviour of the respondents does not reflect their knowledge.","PeriodicalId":472381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community based environmental engineering and management","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community based environmental engineering and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23969/jcbeem.v7i2.10383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reduction of domestic waste in developing countries is a critical issue that requires attention. Behavioural intentions of households can lead to reduce, reuse and recycle behaviour in waste management. Many factors influence the reduction of waste. Psychological and behavioural characteristics often hinder the effectiveness of technical solutions in managing household waste, so it is important to understand human behaviour to design effective policies. Rural areas also face waste problems, but they do not receive as much attention as urban areas. This research aims to identify the behavioural intentions of households to reduce waste in a small village in Bandung Barat Regency. This study uses Rasch model to measure a person's perspective in an objective way. Data for this study was collected using a questionnaire. The questions were rated on a five-point Likert scale. The number of respondents who participated in this study was 27. The small number of respondents was due to difficulties in finding respondents, as most people were farming at the time of the study. The result shows that the person’s reliability is statistically misfit, whereas the item reliability is fit. The respondent/person misfit may be because the respondents are farmers with a low level of education. The Cronbach's alpha value, which measures the interdependence between the person and the item, is 0.70. Since the item reliability is 0.95 and the person reliability is 0.62, it can be concluded that the quality of the items of the instrument is good, and the consistency of the respondents' answers is also good. Questionnaire item I8 is the most difficult question for respondents to agree with a value of +2.09 logit. On the other hand, the easiest questionnaire item to agree on is I18 with -1.74 logit. From the results it can be concluded that the respondents know about waste separation. However, they never carried out waste separation. It can be inferred that the behaviour of the respondents does not reflect their knowledge.
生活垃圾减量行为的Rasch分析:以万隆巴拉县顺登查亚为例
减少发展中国家的家庭废物是一个需要注意的关键问题。家庭的行为意图可以导致废物管理中的减少、再利用和回收行为。许多因素影响着浪费的减少。心理和行为特征往往妨碍管理家庭废物的技术解决办法的有效性,因此了解人的行为以设计有效的政策是很重要的。农村地区也面临着浪费问题,但它们没有像城市地区那样受到重视。本研究旨在确定万隆巴拉特县一个小村庄家庭减少废物的行为意图。本研究使用Rasch模型客观地衡量一个人的视角。本研究的数据是通过问卷调查收集的。这些问题按照李克特五分制进行评分。参与这项研究的受访者人数为27人。受访者人数少是因为很难找到受访者,因为大多数人在研究时都在务农。结果表明,人的信度在统计上是不拟合的,而项目的信度是拟合的。受访者/人的不适应可能是因为受访者是受教育程度较低的农民。Cronbach’s alpha值(衡量人与物品之间的相互依赖程度)为0.70。由于项目信度为0.95,人信度为0.62,因此可以得出结论,该仪器的项目质量良好,被调查者的回答一致性也较好。问卷第8项是受访者最难同意的问题,其值为+2.09 logit。另一方面,最容易达成一致的问卷项目是I18, logit为-1.74。从结果可以得出结论,受访者了解废物分类。然而,他们从未进行过垃圾分类。可以推断,受访者的行为并不能反映他们的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信