Low‐level infection of parasitic copepods on Rainbow Trout does not affect vulnerability to angling or short‐term survival following catch‐and‐release angling

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES
Hannah N. Swain‐Menzel, Eric J. Billman
{"title":"Low‐level infection of parasitic copepods on Rainbow Trout does not affect vulnerability to angling or short‐term survival following catch‐and‐release angling","authors":"Hannah N. Swain‐Menzel, Eric J. Billman","doi":"10.1002/nafm.10957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Parasitic copepods, or “gill lice,” can negatively impact fish hosts resulting in reduction in fitness and increased probability of mortality. The purpose of our study was to determine the effect of Salmincola californiensis on the vulnerability of Rainbow Trout to recreational angling and short‐term survival after being caught and released. We compared the prevalence and intensity of infection of S. californiensis on Rainbow Trout caught while angling and with a backpack electrofisher in May and October 2020 in Birch Creek, Idaho. In October, we also conducted a stress test (i.e. air exposure treatment) on trout caught by angling to determine the effects of parasitic copepods on short‐term survival of Rainbow Trout in a catch‐and‐release fishery. Infection with S. californiensis did not influence the vulnerability of Rainbow Trout to angling. After adjusting for sample size and size distribution, prevalence of infection in May was 48.3% for Rainbow Trout caught while electrofishing compared to 49.3% for Rainbow Trout caught while angling. In October, prevalence of infection was 41.2% for Rainbow Trout caught while electrofishing compared to 41.8% for Rainbow Trout caught while angling. We did not find a difference in short‐term survival of infected and uninfected Rainbow Trout after the stress test (4 ‐7 days after the test). We did not observe consequences of infection by parasitic copepods on vulnerability to angling or short‐term survival of Rainbow Trout in Birch Creek. However, conditions (i.e. low‐level of infection and relatively small fish) may not have been conducive to detecting differences in performance metrics; further testing at higher intensity of infection and with larger fish may uncover negative impacts of parasitic copepods on Rainbow Trout.","PeriodicalId":19263,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Parasitic copepods, or “gill lice,” can negatively impact fish hosts resulting in reduction in fitness and increased probability of mortality. The purpose of our study was to determine the effect of Salmincola californiensis on the vulnerability of Rainbow Trout to recreational angling and short‐term survival after being caught and released. We compared the prevalence and intensity of infection of S. californiensis on Rainbow Trout caught while angling and with a backpack electrofisher in May and October 2020 in Birch Creek, Idaho. In October, we also conducted a stress test (i.e. air exposure treatment) on trout caught by angling to determine the effects of parasitic copepods on short‐term survival of Rainbow Trout in a catch‐and‐release fishery. Infection with S. californiensis did not influence the vulnerability of Rainbow Trout to angling. After adjusting for sample size and size distribution, prevalence of infection in May was 48.3% for Rainbow Trout caught while electrofishing compared to 49.3% for Rainbow Trout caught while angling. In October, prevalence of infection was 41.2% for Rainbow Trout caught while electrofishing compared to 41.8% for Rainbow Trout caught while angling. We did not find a difference in short‐term survival of infected and uninfected Rainbow Trout after the stress test (4 ‐7 days after the test). We did not observe consequences of infection by parasitic copepods on vulnerability to angling or short‐term survival of Rainbow Trout in Birch Creek. However, conditions (i.e. low‐level of infection and relatively small fish) may not have been conducive to detecting differences in performance metrics; further testing at higher intensity of infection and with larger fish may uncover negative impacts of parasitic copepods on Rainbow Trout.
寄生桡足类动物在虹鳟鱼身上的低水平感染不会影响其对钓鱼的脆弱性,也不会影响其在钓鱼后的短期生存
寄生桡足类,或“鳃虱”,会对鱼类宿主产生负面影响,导致适应性降低和死亡率增加。本研究的目的是确定加利福尼亚鲑对虹鳟鱼休闲垂钓脆弱性和捕获放生后短期生存的影响。我们比较了2020年5月和10月在爱达荷州伯奇溪钓鱼时捕获的虹鳟鱼和双肩包电钓鱼感染加利福尼亚S. california的流行率和强度。10月,我们还对钓鱼捕获的鳟鱼进行了压力测试(即空气暴露处理),以确定寄生桡足类对捕捞-释放渔业中虹鳟鱼短期生存的影响。感染加州棘球蚴对虹鳟鱼的钓鱼脆弱性没有影响。在调整样本量和大小分布后,5月份电钓虹鳟鱼的感染率为48.3%,而钓鱼虹鳟鱼的感染率为49.3%。十月份,电钓虹鳟鱼的感染率为41.2%,而钓鱼虹鳟鱼的感染率为41.8%。我们没有发现感染虹鳟鱼和未感染虹鳟鱼在压力测试后(测试后4 - 7天)的短期存活率有差异。我们没有观察到寄生桡足类感染对桦树溪虹鳟鱼的钓鱼脆弱性或短期生存的影响。然而,条件(即低感染水平和相对较小的鱼)可能不利于检测性能指标的差异;在感染强度较高和较大的鱼身上进行进一步测试,可能会发现寄生桡足类动物对虹鳟的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
118
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The North American Journal of Fisheries Management promotes communication among fishery managers with an emphasis on North America, and addresses the maintenance, enhancement, and allocation of fisheries resources. It chronicles the development of practical monitoring and management programs for finfish and exploitable shellfish in marine and freshwater environments. Contributions relate to the management of fish populations, habitats, and users to protect and enhance fish and fishery resources for societal benefits. Case histories of successes, failures, and effects of fisheries programs help convey practical management experience to others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信