{"title":"A cautionary lesson from Gaia systematics: the mono-metallic globular cluster NGC 5904","authors":"Paolo Bianchini, Alessandra Mastrobuono-Battisti","doi":"10.1093/mnrasl/slad140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study of the chemistry of the stellar populations in globular clusters (GCs) is a fundamental task to unveil their formation in the high-redshift universe and to reconstruct the build-up of our Galaxy. Using metallicity estimates from BP/RP low-resolution Gaia DR3 spectra, a recent work presented the surprizing detection of two stellar populations with distinct metallicities in the stellar stream of the GC NGC 5904, otherwise considered a mono-metallic system. The presence of these two populations, with [Fe/H] ∼ −1.4 and [Fe/H] ∼ −2.0 dex, was taken as the evidence of a merger origin of the cluster. In this Letter, using the same data set complemented by new robust metallicity estimates, we carry out a detailed analysis of the metallicity distribution of stars belonging both to the cluster and to its stellar stream, explicitly focusing on the subtle effects of data systematics. We demonstrate that the population at [Fe/H] ∼ −2.0 dex is a data artefact due to error systematics, affecting especially faint stars. The new higher quality metallicity sample corroborates this finding, and it indicates the presence of only one population of stars with metallicity of [Fe/H] ∼ −1.3 dex, in agreement with previous literature studies. We, therefore, conclude that both NGC 5904 and its stellar stream are mono-metallic systems, and emphasize the need of carefully examining systematic effects in large and complex data.","PeriodicalId":18951,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slad140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT The study of the chemistry of the stellar populations in globular clusters (GCs) is a fundamental task to unveil their formation in the high-redshift universe and to reconstruct the build-up of our Galaxy. Using metallicity estimates from BP/RP low-resolution Gaia DR3 spectra, a recent work presented the surprizing detection of two stellar populations with distinct metallicities in the stellar stream of the GC NGC 5904, otherwise considered a mono-metallic system. The presence of these two populations, with [Fe/H] ∼ −1.4 and [Fe/H] ∼ −2.0 dex, was taken as the evidence of a merger origin of the cluster. In this Letter, using the same data set complemented by new robust metallicity estimates, we carry out a detailed analysis of the metallicity distribution of stars belonging both to the cluster and to its stellar stream, explicitly focusing on the subtle effects of data systematics. We demonstrate that the population at [Fe/H] ∼ −2.0 dex is a data artefact due to error systematics, affecting especially faint stars. The new higher quality metallicity sample corroborates this finding, and it indicates the presence of only one population of stars with metallicity of [Fe/H] ∼ −1.3 dex, in agreement with previous literature studies. We, therefore, conclude that both NGC 5904 and its stellar stream are mono-metallic systems, and emphasize the need of carefully examining systematic effects in large and complex data.
期刊介绍:
For papers that merit urgent publication, MNRAS Letters, the online section of Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, publishes short, topical and significant research in all fields of astronomy. Letters should be self-contained and describe the results of an original study whose rapid publication might be expected to have a significant influence on the subsequent development of research in the associated subject area. The 5-page limit must be respected. Authors are required to state their reasons for seeking publication in the form of a Letter when submitting their manuscript.