Mobilisation without opportunity: The UK’s 2020 Black Lives Matter protests

Q1 Social Sciences
Benjamin Abrams
{"title":"Mobilisation without opportunity: The UK’s 2020 Black Lives Matter protests","authors":"Benjamin Abrams","doi":"10.1080/23254823.2023.2239328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the summer of 2020, the United Kingdom, like many countries in Europe, witnessed a strong upsurge in mobilisation for Black Lives. Inspired by protests in the United States following the murder of George Floyd, British demonstrators took to the streets in order to make their voices heard. Peculiarly, they lacked something which we generally associate with substantial episodes of mobilisation: a conducive political opportunity structure. Rather, the political context present in the United Kingdom was generally prohibitive of movement success. This article examines the case of the UK’s 2020 protests to consider how mobilisation can be stimulated despite a palpably politically inopportune context. It draws on contemporary open-source data to characterise and detail the prohibitive structure of political opportunities in the UK domestic setting before laying out three factors that can nonetheless help stimulate mobilisation in such circumstances: quotidian disruption, frame diffusion, and remaindered resources.","PeriodicalId":37289,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2023.2239328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the summer of 2020, the United Kingdom, like many countries in Europe, witnessed a strong upsurge in mobilisation for Black Lives. Inspired by protests in the United States following the murder of George Floyd, British demonstrators took to the streets in order to make their voices heard. Peculiarly, they lacked something which we generally associate with substantial episodes of mobilisation: a conducive political opportunity structure. Rather, the political context present in the United Kingdom was generally prohibitive of movement success. This article examines the case of the UK’s 2020 protests to consider how mobilisation can be stimulated despite a palpably politically inopportune context. It draws on contemporary open-source data to characterise and detail the prohibitive structure of political opportunities in the UK domestic setting before laying out three factors that can nonetheless help stimulate mobilisation in such circumstances: quotidian disruption, frame diffusion, and remaindered resources.
没有机会的动员:英国2020年“黑人的命也重要”抗议活动
在2020年夏天,与欧洲许多国家一样,英国见证了“黑人生命”运动动员的强劲高涨。受美国乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀后发生的抗议活动的启发,英国示威者走上街头,发出自己的声音。特别的是,它们缺乏我们通常与大规模动员联系在一起的东西:有利的政治机会结构。相反,当时英国的政治环境普遍阻碍了运动的成功。本文考察了英国2020年抗议活动的案例,以考虑如何在明显不合适的政治背景下刺激动员。它利用当代开源数据来描述和详细描述英国国内环境中政治机会的禁闭性结构,然后列出了在这种情况下仍有助于刺激动员的三个因素:日常干扰、框架扩散和剩余资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology is a peer-reviewed journal published under the auspices of the European Sociological Association. The study of culture is the fastest growing area in both European and North American sociology. Political sociology is also re-establishing itself as a central plank of the discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信