‘Inanimate Objects’: Human consequences of Australia’s commodified approach to migrant workers during COVID-19

IF 1.2 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Laurie Berg, Bassina Farbenblum
{"title":"‘Inanimate Objects’: Human consequences of Australia’s commodified approach to migrant workers during COVID-19","authors":"Laurie Berg, Bassina Farbenblum","doi":"10.14197/atr.201223212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian government has long treated migrant labour as a commodity, a ‘tap’ to be turned on and off in accordance with government or employer perceptions of the labour market. This article examines the Australian government’s policies concerning migrant workers during COVID-19, against the backdrop of its failure to take any meaningful steps to address systemic migrant exploitation over the past decade. It then considers the devastating human consequences of these policies during the first pandemic lockdowns, based on empirical data from over 6,100 temporary migrants collected in mid-2020. The data demonstrate migrant workers’ inability to pay for essential needs (including food and medical care); their lack of access to secure or emergency housing as well as emergency support in the form of cash or food; and their experiences of racism, discrimination, and social exclusion during the pandemic. We conclude that Australia’s commodified approach to migrant workers and acquiescence to exploitation reflected a deeper disavowal of migrants’ humanity and rights. This lens explains the apparent contradiction in which the government first denied or disregarded its legal and moral responsibilities towards them during the immediate crisis posed by the pandemic, while at the same time courting their labour in the context of skills shortages during and after the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":43972,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Trafficking Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Trafficking Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201223212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Australian government has long treated migrant labour as a commodity, a ‘tap’ to be turned on and off in accordance with government or employer perceptions of the labour market. This article examines the Australian government’s policies concerning migrant workers during COVID-19, against the backdrop of its failure to take any meaningful steps to address systemic migrant exploitation over the past decade. It then considers the devastating human consequences of these policies during the first pandemic lockdowns, based on empirical data from over 6,100 temporary migrants collected in mid-2020. The data demonstrate migrant workers’ inability to pay for essential needs (including food and medical care); their lack of access to secure or emergency housing as well as emergency support in the form of cash or food; and their experiences of racism, discrimination, and social exclusion during the pandemic. We conclude that Australia’s commodified approach to migrant workers and acquiescence to exploitation reflected a deeper disavowal of migrants’ humanity and rights. This lens explains the apparent contradiction in which the government first denied or disregarded its legal and moral responsibilities towards them during the immediate crisis posed by the pandemic, while at the same time courting their labour in the context of skills shortages during and after the pandemic.
“无生命的物体”:2019冠状病毒病期间澳大利亚对移民工人的商品化做法对人类的影响
长期以来,澳大利亚政府一直将移民劳工视为一种商品,一种可以根据政府或雇主对劳动力市场的看法来打开和关闭的“水龙头”。在过去十年中,澳大利亚政府未能采取任何有意义的措施来解决系统性剥削移民的问题,本文审视了澳大利亚政府在COVID-19期间有关移民工人的政策。然后,根据2020年中期收集的6100多名临时移民的经验数据,研究了这些政策在第一次大流行封锁期间对人类造成的破坏性后果。数据表明,移徙工人无力支付基本需求(包括食品和医疗);他们无法获得安全或紧急住房,也无法获得现金或粮食等紧急支助;以及他们在大流行期间遭受的种族主义、歧视和社会排斥。我们的结论是,澳大利亚对移民工人的商品化做法和对剥削的默许反映了对移民的人性和权利的更深层次的否认。这一视角解释了一个明显的矛盾,即在大流行造成的直接危机期间,政府首先否认或无视其对他们的法律和道德责任,同时在大流行期间和之后的技能短缺背景下争取他们的劳动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anti-Trafficking Review
Anti-Trafficking Review CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信