Sympathy for the bogeyman planner: a call for a nuanced discourse on planning ethics in India

IF 2 Q3 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Planning Practice and Research Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1080/02697459.2023.2259269

Surajit Chakravarty, Poonam Prakash

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper reports findings from a survey of public-sector urban planners in India. The survey attempts to gauge planners’ opinions on the importance of planning values in everyday decisions and the degree to which these values are delivered in practice. In-depth interviews were used to validate the survey results and investigate themes further. The study presents a nuanced and contextualized analysis of the attitudes and mindsets of planners. It is expected that the study will initiate a discourse on planning values in India and encourage planners to confront the full implications of their decisions.KEYWORDS: Planning ethicsplanning valuesIndiapublic valuesurban planning Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

查看原文本刊更多论文

同情邪恶的规划师:呼吁对印度的规划伦理进行细致入微的讨论

摘要本文报告了对印度公共部门城市规划者的调查结果。这项调查试图衡量规划者对日常决策中规划价值的重要性的看法，以及这些价值在实践中实现的程度。采用深度访谈来验证调查结果并进一步调查主题。该研究对规划者的态度和心态进行了细致入微的情境化分析。预期这项研究将开始讨论印度的规划价值，并鼓励规划人员正视其决定的全部影响。关键词:规划伦理、规划价值、印度公共价值、城市规划披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Planning Practice and Research REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

18.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking. PPR is committed to: •bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems •providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice