Survival and Growth of Wetland Species as Live Stakes with Lessons for Effective Management Practices

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Rose C. Wetzel, Adrienne R. Hobbins, Matthew J. Wilson
{"title":"Survival and Growth of Wetland Species as Live Stakes with Lessons for Effective Management Practices","authors":"Rose C. Wetzel, Adrienne R. Hobbins, Matthew J. Wilson","doi":"10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Live stakes are woody cuttings from wetland tree and shrub species that can root in moist soil. The use of live stakes in riparian and wetland restoration is becoming an increasingly popular technique because of relatively low costs and maintenance. However, the success of live stakes likely depends on the species, environmental conditions, and planting treatments. In particular, the benefit of artificial rooting hormone or weed control strategies have not been widely studied, particularly for eastern North American species. We performed a common garden experiment with 1800 live stakes of eight species commonly used in restoration, where stakes were randomly blocked by species and treatments, including herbicide application to control invasive plants and rooting hormone to encourage growth. We examined how the use of herbicide and rooting hormone, species, stake diameter, and planting depth of stakes affected live stake survival and growth. We found survival, growth, and response to treatments were species-dependent, and that buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), and silky dogwood (Cornus obliqua) were the species with the greatest survival one year post-planting. The only species that benefited from treatments were red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea) and buttonbush, which had the best survival with rooting hormone, and silky dogwood, which had the best survival with both treatments. In addition, buttonbush showed significant clustering of surviving stakes, possibly indicating buttonbush might be most sensitive to differences in microhabitat conditions. Lastly, we provide an analysis to help conservation professionals gain insight into live stake survival, species selection, and best management practices.","PeriodicalId":49780,"journal":{"name":"Natural Areas Journal","volume":" 41","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Areas Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Live stakes are woody cuttings from wetland tree and shrub species that can root in moist soil. The use of live stakes in riparian and wetland restoration is becoming an increasingly popular technique because of relatively low costs and maintenance. However, the success of live stakes likely depends on the species, environmental conditions, and planting treatments. In particular, the benefit of artificial rooting hormone or weed control strategies have not been widely studied, particularly for eastern North American species. We performed a common garden experiment with 1800 live stakes of eight species commonly used in restoration, where stakes were randomly blocked by species and treatments, including herbicide application to control invasive plants and rooting hormone to encourage growth. We examined how the use of herbicide and rooting hormone, species, stake diameter, and planting depth of stakes affected live stake survival and growth. We found survival, growth, and response to treatments were species-dependent, and that buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), and silky dogwood (Cornus obliqua) were the species with the greatest survival one year post-planting. The only species that benefited from treatments were red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea) and buttonbush, which had the best survival with rooting hormone, and silky dogwood, which had the best survival with both treatments. In addition, buttonbush showed significant clustering of surviving stakes, possibly indicating buttonbush might be most sensitive to differences in microhabitat conditions. Lastly, we provide an analysis to help conservation professionals gain insight into live stake survival, species selection, and best management practices.
湿地物种的生存和成长与有效管理实践的经验教训
活木桩是湿地树木和灌木物种的木质插枝,可以在潮湿的土壤中生根。由于成本和维护成本相对较低,在河岸和湿地恢复中使用活桩正成为越来越受欢迎的技术。然而,活树桩的成功可能取决于物种、环境条件和种植处理。特别是,人工生根激素或杂草控制策略的益处尚未得到广泛研究,特别是对北美东部物种。我们进行了一个普通的花园实验,用1800根活木桩进行了修复中常用的8种植物,在木桩上随机设置了不同的物种和处理方法,包括使用除草剂来控制入侵植物和使用生根激素来促进生长。我们研究了除草剂和生根激素的使用、木桩的种类、木桩直径和种植深度如何影响木桩的存活和生长。结果表明,种植后1年的存活率、生长情况和对不同处理的反应均具有一定的物种依赖性,其中洋油桐(Cephalanthus occidentalis)、接骨木(Sambucus canadensis)和山茱萸(Cornus obliqua)的存活率最高。只有红叶山茱萸(Cornus sericea)和山茱萸(buttill灌木)在生根激素处理下的存活率最高,而丝茱萸在两种处理下的存活率都最高。此外,钮扣灌木存在显著的存活桩聚类,这可能表明钮扣灌木对微生境条件的差异最为敏感。最后,我们提供了一个分析,以帮助保护专业人士深入了解活桩的生存,物种选择和最佳管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Areas Journal
Natural Areas Journal 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Natural Areas Journal is the flagship publication of the Natural Areas Association is the leading voice in natural areas management and preservation. The Journal features peer-reviewed original research articles on topics such as: -Applied conservation biology- Ecological restoration- Natural areas management- Ecological assessment and monitoring- Invasive and exotic species management- Habitat protection- Fire ecology. It also includes writing on conservation issues, forums, topic reviews, editorials, state and federal natural area activities and book reviews. In addition, we publish special issues on various topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信