Better together: religious-based relationships and communal coping among older African American couples

IF 0.8 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Antonius D. Skipper, Andrew H. Rose, Jayla Head, Alex Reeves
{"title":"Better together: religious-based relationships and communal coping among older African American couples","authors":"Antonius D. Skipper, Andrew H. Rose, Jayla Head, Alex Reeves","doi":"10.1080/15528030.2023.2278797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDisparities in relational stressors highlight the need to understand how older African Americans establish enduring romantic relationships. The current study examined the association between religious-based romantic relationships and communal coping among married and cohabiting older African American couples. Participants were 194 African American couples wherein both partners were at least 50 years of age or older. Participants completed measures assessing religion within their relationship and communal coping, and data were evaluated using the Actor Partner Interdependence Model. Men’s religious-based relational views were associated with their own communal coping and the communal coping of their female partner. Higher levels of religious-based views among men contributed to more frequent experiences of communal coping in their romantic relationship. There were no significant effects between women’s religious-based relational views in association with either women’s or men’s communal coping. Results indicate that men who perceive their romantic relationship as having religious-based significance may be more likely to engage in communal coping and more likely to benefit from their partner’s communal coping. These findings can be used to inform efforts designed to improve the relational bonds within romantic older African American relationships.KEYWORDS: African Americancopingdyadic datareligiositysanctification Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Texas Tech University.","PeriodicalId":44539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion Spirituality & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion Spirituality & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15528030.2023.2278797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTDisparities in relational stressors highlight the need to understand how older African Americans establish enduring romantic relationships. The current study examined the association between religious-based romantic relationships and communal coping among married and cohabiting older African American couples. Participants were 194 African American couples wherein both partners were at least 50 years of age or older. Participants completed measures assessing religion within their relationship and communal coping, and data were evaluated using the Actor Partner Interdependence Model. Men’s religious-based relational views were associated with their own communal coping and the communal coping of their female partner. Higher levels of religious-based views among men contributed to more frequent experiences of communal coping in their romantic relationship. There were no significant effects between women’s religious-based relational views in association with either women’s or men’s communal coping. Results indicate that men who perceive their romantic relationship as having religious-based significance may be more likely to engage in communal coping and more likely to benefit from their partner’s communal coping. These findings can be used to inform efforts designed to improve the relational bonds within romantic older African American relationships.KEYWORDS: African Americancopingdyadic datareligiositysanctification Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Texas Tech University.
更好地在一起:基于宗教的关系和老年非裔美国夫妇的共同应对
摘要关系压力源的差异突出了了解老年非裔美国人如何建立持久浪漫关系的必要性。目前的研究调查了已婚和同居的非裔美国老年夫妇之间基于宗教的浪漫关系和共同应对之间的关系。参与者是194对非裔美国夫妇,其中双方的年龄至少为50岁或以上。参与者完成了评估宗教在他们的关系和共同应对中的作用的测量,数据使用参与者伴侣相互依赖模型进行评估。男性基于宗教的关系观与他们自己的共同应对以及他们女性伴侣的共同应对有关。男性中基于宗教的观点水平较高,导致他们在恋爱关系中更频繁地经历共同应对。女性基于宗教的关系观与女性或男性的公共应对之间没有显著影响。结果表明,那些认为自己的恋爱关系具有宗教意义的男性更有可能参与集体应对,也更有可能从伴侣的集体应对中获益。这些发现可以用来为改善浪漫的老年非裔美国人关系中的关系纽带提供信息。关键词:非裔美国人;统计数据;宗教;本研究得到了德克萨斯理工大学的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Religion Spirituality & Aging
Journal of Religion Spirituality & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of Religion, Spirituality and Aging is an interdisciplinary, interfaith professional journal in which the needs, aspirations, and resources of aging constituencies come clearly into focus. Combining practical innovation and scholarly insight, the peer-reviewed journal offers timely information and probing articles on such subjects as long-term care for the aging, support systems for families of the aging, retirement, counseling, death, ethical issues, and more . Providing a crucial balance between theory and practice, the journal informs secular professionals – administrators, counselors, nurses, physicians, recreational rehabilitative therapists, and social workers – about developments in the field of Religion, Spirituality, and Aging. The journal also serves as a resource for religious professionals, such as pastors, religious educators, chaplains, and pastoral counselors who work with aging people and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信