A requiem for the Unabomber

Q2 Social Sciences
James C. Oleson
{"title":"A requiem for the Unabomber","authors":"James C. Oleson","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2023.2279312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTTheodore John Kaczynski, better known as the Unabomber, died by suicide in June 2023. One of the most best known criminals of the late twentieth century, and a former Harvard mathematics prodigy with an IQ of 167, Kaczynski is remembered for the 1995 publication of his 35,000-word anti-technology essay, Industrial Society and Its Future. This work called for the rejection of technological civilization and the embracing of wild nature. Its publication led to Kaczynski’s identification, apprehension, and a convoluted set of legal proceedings that culminated in a coerced plea arrangement and his incarceration in the US federal supermax prison. Kaczynski was not permitted to introduce a defense of necessity. Instead, he was labeled as ‘mad’ by the press and his family, and identified as a paranoid schizophrenic by a court-appointed psychiatrist. But several commentators have argued that Kaczynski’s reasoning is sound. Indeed, many of Kaczynski’s observations about technology and the environment have proven to be prescient. Accordingly, a new generation of followers have adopted his anti-technology philosophy. If Kaczynski was correct about technology and the environment, this might warrant a reevaluation of his socio-theoretical writings and reconsideration of his constructed persona as a mad genius.KEYWORDS: UnabomberKaczynskianti-techclimate changeUnabomber Manifesto Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":" 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2023.2279312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTTheodore John Kaczynski, better known as the Unabomber, died by suicide in June 2023. One of the most best known criminals of the late twentieth century, and a former Harvard mathematics prodigy with an IQ of 167, Kaczynski is remembered for the 1995 publication of his 35,000-word anti-technology essay, Industrial Society and Its Future. This work called for the rejection of technological civilization and the embracing of wild nature. Its publication led to Kaczynski’s identification, apprehension, and a convoluted set of legal proceedings that culminated in a coerced plea arrangement and his incarceration in the US federal supermax prison. Kaczynski was not permitted to introduce a defense of necessity. Instead, he was labeled as ‘mad’ by the press and his family, and identified as a paranoid schizophrenic by a court-appointed psychiatrist. But several commentators have argued that Kaczynski’s reasoning is sound. Indeed, many of Kaczynski’s observations about technology and the environment have proven to be prescient. Accordingly, a new generation of followers have adopted his anti-technology philosophy. If Kaczynski was correct about technology and the environment, this might warrant a reevaluation of his socio-theoretical writings and reconsideration of his constructed persona as a mad genius.KEYWORDS: UnabomberKaczynskianti-techclimate changeUnabomber Manifesto Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
为炸弹客的安魂曲
西奥多·约翰·卡钦斯基,以“炸弹客”而闻名,于2023年6月自杀身亡。卡钦斯基是20世纪末最著名的罪犯之一,他曾是哈佛大学的数学神童,智商高达167。1995年,卡钦斯基发表了一篇35000字的反科技文章《工业社会及其未来》,为人们所铭记。这项工作呼吁拒绝技术文明,拥抱野生自然。这篇文章的发表导致了卡钦斯基的身份确认、逮捕,以及一系列复杂的法律程序,最终导致他被迫认罪,并被监禁在美国联邦超级监狱。卡钦斯基不被允许提出必要性辩护。相反,他被媒体和家人贴上了“疯子”的标签,被法院指定的精神科医生确诊为偏执型精神分裂症患者。但是一些评论家认为卡钦斯基的推理是合理的。事实上,卡钦斯基对技术和环境的许多观察已被证明是有先见之明的。因此,新一代的追随者接受了他的反技术哲学。如果卡钦斯基对技术和环境的看法是正确的,那么我们就有理由重新评估他的社会理论著作,重新审视他作为一个疯狂天才的形象。关键词:炸弹客卡钦斯基反技术气候变化炸弹客宣言披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Justice Review
Contemporary Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信