Brendan P. Sullivan, Elias Arias Nava, Monica Rossi, Sergio Terzi
{"title":"A systematic literature review of changeability in engineering systems along the life cycle","authors":"Brendan P. Sullivan, Elias Arias Nava, Monica Rossi, Sergio Terzi","doi":"10.1080/09544828.2023.2273248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The escalating dynamism of external pressures and the persistent demand from stakeholders for systems to maintain value amidst continuous change necessitates a re-evaluation of how system value is delivered. This literature review addresses the ambiguously defined concept of changeability, which spans domains, incorporates various ‘ilities’ and has in part impeded the formulation of effective comprehensive industry strategies. As a successful approach to cope with change, changeability involves the design of engineering systems that can continue to change, quickly (agile) and easily (flexible). This paper elucidates how changeability is defined, and the elements used to evaluate change in engineering systems. Subsequently, it reviews the methods and strategies employed to quantify, measure, and analyse changeability and change-related ‘ilities’. An examination of various cases and applied research sets allowed the researchers to illustrate the roles, features and effects of changeability in the design of complex engineering systems throughout the entire lifecycle, thereby confirming and consolidating how changeability is both perceived and executed. Based on these findings, future research related to the quantification of changeability levels, and the cost implications associated are proposed, with an emphasis on utilising and integrating systems models (model-based systems engineering) to standardise and simplify implementation across various engineering systems.","PeriodicalId":50207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Design","volume":" 25","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2023.2273248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The escalating dynamism of external pressures and the persistent demand from stakeholders for systems to maintain value amidst continuous change necessitates a re-evaluation of how system value is delivered. This literature review addresses the ambiguously defined concept of changeability, which spans domains, incorporates various ‘ilities’ and has in part impeded the formulation of effective comprehensive industry strategies. As a successful approach to cope with change, changeability involves the design of engineering systems that can continue to change, quickly (agile) and easily (flexible). This paper elucidates how changeability is defined, and the elements used to evaluate change in engineering systems. Subsequently, it reviews the methods and strategies employed to quantify, measure, and analyse changeability and change-related ‘ilities’. An examination of various cases and applied research sets allowed the researchers to illustrate the roles, features and effects of changeability in the design of complex engineering systems throughout the entire lifecycle, thereby confirming and consolidating how changeability is both perceived and executed. Based on these findings, future research related to the quantification of changeability levels, and the cost implications associated are proposed, with an emphasis on utilising and integrating systems models (model-based systems engineering) to standardise and simplify implementation across various engineering systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Engineering Design is a leading international publication that provides an essential forum for dialogue on important issues across all disciplines and aspects of the design of engineered products and systems. The Journal publishes pioneering, contemporary, best industrial practice as well as authoritative research, studies and review papers on the underlying principles of design, its management, practice, techniques and methodologies, rather than specific domain applications.
We welcome papers that examine the following topics:
Engineering design aesthetics, style and form-
Big data analytics in engineering design-
Collaborative design in engineering-
Engineering concept design-
Creativity and innovation in engineering-
Engineering design architectures-
Design costing in engineering
Design education and pedagogy in engineering-
Engineering design for X, e.g. manufacturability, assembly, environment, sustainability-
Engineering design management-
Design risk and uncertainty in engineering-
Engineering design theory and methodology-
Designing product platforms, modularity and reuse in engineering-
Emotive design, e.g. Kansei engineering-
Ergonomics, styling and the design process-
Evolutionary design activity in engineering (product improvement & refinement)-
Global and distributed engineering design-
Inclusive design and assistive engineering technology-
Engineering industrial design and total design-
Integrated engineering design development-
Knowledge and information management in engineering-
Engineering maintainability, sustainability, safety and standards-
Multi, inter and trans disciplinary engineering design-
New engineering product design and development-
Engineering product introduction process[...]