Incentives to cultivate a diaspora vote and rhetorical involvement in foreign elections: Lessons from Colombian politicians’ involvement in the 2020 US presidential election

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Taishi Muraoka
{"title":"Incentives to cultivate a diaspora vote and rhetorical involvement in foreign elections: Lessons from Colombian politicians’ involvement in the 2020 US presidential election","authors":"Taishi Muraoka","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2023.2278541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWhat explains politicians’ involvement in foreign elections? Understanding this behavior is important not only because it has received little scholarly attention but also because it could undermine public faith in electoral integrity in target countries. In this study, I consider an electorally based explanation, which suggests that politicians’ electoral incentives to appeal to expatriate voters in a foreign country can explain their rhetorical involvement in that country’s elections. I test this argument in the context of the 2020 US presidential election, where more than 50 Colombian MPs extensively promoted or attacked Joe Biden and Donald Trump on social media. My analysis indicates that whether Colombian MPs competed for Colombian Americans’ votes and their popularity in the US are the systematic correlates of how much they got involved in the 2020 US election. The findings highlight how diaspora enfranchisement is important to understand elite online communication that cuts across national borders.KEYWORDS: Colombiaconstituency communicationdiasporaelectoral interventionsocial media AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank Brian Crisp, Christopher Lucas, Theodore Masthay, Jacob Montgomery, Guillermo Rosas, Margit Tavits, Yi-Ting Wang, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 2023 Southern Political Science Association Annual Meeting.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2278541Notes1. Put differently, they may become skeptical about the extent to which election outcomes reflect the will of the people. Media reporting of an intervention event is often sufficient to trigger this negative effect of eroding voter confidence (Dawood, Citation2021).2. According to Hutcheson and Arrighi (Citation2015), four different diaspora electoral systems are used around the world. First is reserved seats, which allow expatriates to elect their own representatives. The other three types of diaspora electoral systems do not create a special constituency for overseas voters but provide different mechanisms to aggregate diaspora votes either (i) in districts where expatriates have biographical ties; (ii) in a single preexisting district within the state (usually the capital city); or (iii) as a part of a national voting total. Colombia uses reserved seats for the lower house and (iii) for the upper house.3. However, in Appendix B, I extend the analysis to Colombian MPs’ involvement in elections in Spain and Venezuela and show that diaspora electoral incentives are useful predictors in these elections as well.4. According to Burgess and Tyburski (Citation2020), overseas voters’ turnout varies across countries, from below 1% point in countries like Mexico to more than 40% points in Italy.5. This allows them to avoid unnecessary conflicts with competitors (Crisp & Desposato, Citation2004).6. Østergaard-Nielsen and Camatarri (Citation2022) also show that Italian MPs elected via diaspora reserved seats tend to hold different views about their representative roles, perceiving themselves more as trustees than delegates.7. This makes Colombian Americans the third largest voting bloc for the US elections in Florida, second only to Cubans and Puerto Ricans. During the 2020 US presidential election, both Biden and Trump camps ran extensive campaigns targeting Colombian Americans (Salazar, Citation2020; Sesin, Citation2020a).8. See Appendix C.9. See https://www.camara.gov.co/ (House of Representatives); https://www.senado.gov.co/ (Senate); and https://congresovisible.uniandes.edu.co/ (Congreso Visible, a website that gathers information on parliament activities operated by the University of the Andes).10. They include Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Mike Pence, the Trump family, and more.11. An exception is “2020,” which was used in some of the key terms (e.g., EE.UU 2020 and elección 2020).12. I relied on all classification models available in RTextTools (Jurka, Collingwood, Boydstun, Grossman, & Atteveldt, Citation2013) that did not return all 0 or 1: support vector machines, glmnet, logit boosting, random forests, and regression trees. Because the data are imbalanced with only a small fraction of the posts related to the 2020 US election, I also tried using synthetic balanced samples based on Random Over-Sampling Examples (ROSE) (Lunardon, Menardi, & Torelli, Citation2014). For additional information about the classification process, see Appendix D.13. This step ensures that the final classification does not suffer from false positives – i.e., posts that were not about the 2020 US election are coded as 1.14. For some analyses on the different types of tweets, see Appendix E.15. The data is based on the National Civil Registry. See https://elecciones.registraduria.gov.co:81/elec20180311/.16. These variables were collected from the parliament websites and Congreso Visible. Descriptive statistics are in Appendix G.17. The model includes MPs who posted something in the period under study.18. I obtain the same result using MPs’ vote shares in the US constituency. See Appendix H.19. I explore two additional implications of the electorally based argument in Appendix I. First, MPs’ popularity among Colombian expatriates outside the US cannot explain their involvement in the 2020 US election. Second, there is some suggestive evidence that MPs who competed for diaspora votes but were not very popular in the US tended to avoid explicit pronouncements of their sides.20. But this suffers from selection bias because ordinary MPs’ actions on social media get less media attention than those of party and executive leaders.Additional informationNotes on contributorsTaishi MuraokaTaishi Muraoka is an Assistant Research Fellow at the Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica. He studies electoral politics, political institutions, and elite online communication.","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":" 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2278541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTWhat explains politicians’ involvement in foreign elections? Understanding this behavior is important not only because it has received little scholarly attention but also because it could undermine public faith in electoral integrity in target countries. In this study, I consider an electorally based explanation, which suggests that politicians’ electoral incentives to appeal to expatriate voters in a foreign country can explain their rhetorical involvement in that country’s elections. I test this argument in the context of the 2020 US presidential election, where more than 50 Colombian MPs extensively promoted or attacked Joe Biden and Donald Trump on social media. My analysis indicates that whether Colombian MPs competed for Colombian Americans’ votes and their popularity in the US are the systematic correlates of how much they got involved in the 2020 US election. The findings highlight how diaspora enfranchisement is important to understand elite online communication that cuts across national borders.KEYWORDS: Colombiaconstituency communicationdiasporaelectoral interventionsocial media AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank Brian Crisp, Christopher Lucas, Theodore Masthay, Jacob Montgomery, Guillermo Rosas, Margit Tavits, Yi-Ting Wang, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 2023 Southern Political Science Association Annual Meeting.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2278541Notes1. Put differently, they may become skeptical about the extent to which election outcomes reflect the will of the people. Media reporting of an intervention event is often sufficient to trigger this negative effect of eroding voter confidence (Dawood, Citation2021).2. According to Hutcheson and Arrighi (Citation2015), four different diaspora electoral systems are used around the world. First is reserved seats, which allow expatriates to elect their own representatives. The other three types of diaspora electoral systems do not create a special constituency for overseas voters but provide different mechanisms to aggregate diaspora votes either (i) in districts where expatriates have biographical ties; (ii) in a single preexisting district within the state (usually the capital city); or (iii) as a part of a national voting total. Colombia uses reserved seats for the lower house and (iii) for the upper house.3. However, in Appendix B, I extend the analysis to Colombian MPs’ involvement in elections in Spain and Venezuela and show that diaspora electoral incentives are useful predictors in these elections as well.4. According to Burgess and Tyburski (Citation2020), overseas voters’ turnout varies across countries, from below 1% point in countries like Mexico to more than 40% points in Italy.5. This allows them to avoid unnecessary conflicts with competitors (Crisp & Desposato, Citation2004).6. Østergaard-Nielsen and Camatarri (Citation2022) also show that Italian MPs elected via diaspora reserved seats tend to hold different views about their representative roles, perceiving themselves more as trustees than delegates.7. This makes Colombian Americans the third largest voting bloc for the US elections in Florida, second only to Cubans and Puerto Ricans. During the 2020 US presidential election, both Biden and Trump camps ran extensive campaigns targeting Colombian Americans (Salazar, Citation2020; Sesin, Citation2020a).8. See Appendix C.9. See https://www.camara.gov.co/ (House of Representatives); https://www.senado.gov.co/ (Senate); and https://congresovisible.uniandes.edu.co/ (Congreso Visible, a website that gathers information on parliament activities operated by the University of the Andes).10. They include Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Mike Pence, the Trump family, and more.11. An exception is “2020,” which was used in some of the key terms (e.g., EE.UU 2020 and elección 2020).12. I relied on all classification models available in RTextTools (Jurka, Collingwood, Boydstun, Grossman, & Atteveldt, Citation2013) that did not return all 0 or 1: support vector machines, glmnet, logit boosting, random forests, and regression trees. Because the data are imbalanced with only a small fraction of the posts related to the 2020 US election, I also tried using synthetic balanced samples based on Random Over-Sampling Examples (ROSE) (Lunardon, Menardi, & Torelli, Citation2014). For additional information about the classification process, see Appendix D.13. This step ensures that the final classification does not suffer from false positives – i.e., posts that were not about the 2020 US election are coded as 1.14. For some analyses on the different types of tweets, see Appendix E.15. The data is based on the National Civil Registry. See https://elecciones.registraduria.gov.co:81/elec20180311/.16. These variables were collected from the parliament websites and Congreso Visible. Descriptive statistics are in Appendix G.17. The model includes MPs who posted something in the period under study.18. I obtain the same result using MPs’ vote shares in the US constituency. See Appendix H.19. I explore two additional implications of the electorally based argument in Appendix I. First, MPs’ popularity among Colombian expatriates outside the US cannot explain their involvement in the 2020 US election. Second, there is some suggestive evidence that MPs who competed for diaspora votes but were not very popular in the US tended to avoid explicit pronouncements of their sides.20. But this suffers from selection bias because ordinary MPs’ actions on social media get less media attention than those of party and executive leaders.Additional informationNotes on contributorsTaishi MuraokaTaishi Muraoka is an Assistant Research Fellow at the Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica. He studies electoral politics, political institutions, and elite online communication.
培养海外侨民投票的动机和对外国选举的口头干预:哥伦比亚政客参与2020年美国总统大选的教训
如何解释政客参与外国选举?了解这种行为很重要,不仅因为它很少受到学术界的关注,还因为它可能会破坏公众对目标国家选举诚信的信心。在这项研究中,我考虑了一种基于选举的解释,这表明政治家在外国吸引外籍选民的选举激励可以解释他们在该国选举中的修辞参与。我在2020年美国总统大选的背景下检验了这一论点,当时有50多名哥伦比亚议员在社交媒体上大力宣传或攻击乔·拜登(Joe Biden)和唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)。我的分析表明,哥伦比亚国会议员是否争夺哥伦比亚裔美国人的选票,以及他们在美国的受欢迎程度,是他们参与2020年美国大选程度的系统性关联。研究结果突出表明,侨民选举权对于理解跨越国界的精英在线交流是多么重要。我要感谢Brian Crisp、Christopher Lucas、Theodore Masthay、Jacob Montgomery、Guillermo Rosas、Margit Tavits、Wang Yi-Ting和两位匿名评论者提供的有益反馈。该论文的早期版本在2023年南方政治科学协会年会上发表。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。补充材料本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2278541Notes1上在线获取。换句话说,他们可能会怀疑选举结果在多大程度上反映了人民的意愿。媒体对干预事件的报道往往足以引发这种侵蚀选民信心的负面影响(Dawood, Citation2021)。根据Hutcheson和Arrighi (Citation2015)的研究,世界上有四种不同的侨民选举制度。首先是保留席位,允许外籍人士选举自己的代表。其他三种散居侨民选举制度没有为海外选民设立一个特别选区,但提供了不同的机制来聚集散居侨民的选票:(1)在侨民有血缘关系的地区;(ii)在州内单一的已存在的地区(通常是首府城市);或(iii)作为全国投票总数的一部分。哥伦比亚为下议院保留席位,为上议院保留席位。然而,在附录B中,我将分析扩展到哥伦比亚国会议员对西班牙和委内瑞拉选举的参与,并表明侨民选举激励因素在这些选举中也是有用的预测因素。根据Burgess和Tyburski (Citation2020)的研究,海外选民的投票率因国家而异,从墨西哥等国的1%以下到意大利的40%以上。这使他们能够避免与竞争对手发生不必要的冲突(Crisp & Desposato, Citation2004)。Østergaard-Nielsen和Camatarri (Citation2022)也表明,通过海外保留席位选出的意大利议员往往对自己的代表角色持有不同的看法,他们更多地将自己视为受托人而不是代表。这使得哥伦比亚裔美国人成为佛罗里达州美国大选的第三大投票群体,仅次于古巴人和波多黎各人。在2020年美国总统大选期间,拜登和特朗普阵营都针对哥伦比亚裔美国人开展了广泛的竞选活动(Salazar, Citation2020;赛信,Citation2020a)。8。见附录C.9。参见https://www.camara.gov.co/(众议院);https://www.senado.gov.co/(参议院);以及https://congresovisible.uniandes.edu.co/ (Congreso Visible,一个收集国会活动信息的网站,由安第斯大学运营)。他们包括卡玛拉·哈里斯、巴拉克·奥巴马、迈克·彭斯、特朗普一家等等。一个例外是“2020”,它在一些关键术语(例如EE)中使用。UU 2020和elección 2020)。我依赖于RTextTools中所有可用的分类模型(Jurka, Collingwood, Boydstun, Grossman, & Atteveldt, Citation2013),这些模型不返回全部0或1:支持向量机,glmnet, logit boosting,随机森林和回归树。由于数据不平衡,只有一小部分与2020年美国大选相关的帖子,我还尝试使用基于随机过采样示例(ROSE)的合成平衡样本(Lunardon, Menardi, & Torelli, Citation2014)。有关分类过程的更多信息,请参见附录D.13。这一步骤确保了最终的分类不会出现误报,即与2020年美国大选无关的帖子被编码为1.14。关于不同类型推文的一些分析,见附录E.15。该数据基于国家民事登记处。见https://elecciones.registraduria.gov.co: 81 / elec20180311 / 16。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信