Familiarity and Fear

IF 0.4 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Francine Tyler, F. Elizabeth Gray, Catherine Strong
{"title":"Familiarity and Fear","authors":"Francine Tyler, F. Elizabeth Gray, Catherine Strong","doi":"10.1080/13688804.2023.2280008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractResearch into historic media coverage of child-homicide cases in New Zealand between 1870 and 1930 reveals that giving prominence to the murderer, rather than the victim, was a long-standing and consistent newsroom practice. Across the six decades, the names of the accused were published three times as frequently as the names of the victims. The research further reveals that legislative changes restricting the media’s power to report name details of accused persons had no discernible effect on how frequently accused child killers were named in the period. However, particular factors such as the murderer’s relationship to the victim, the murderer’s gender, and the salaciousness of the crime, appear to have had some impact on the media’s decisions to name those involved.KEYWORDS: Crime reportingchild killinghomicidenaming patternsnews media Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Wood and Knepper, “Crime Stories”, 345.2 Sacco, “Media Constructions of Crime”, 141.3 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, Race, Gender, and Newsworthiness; Katz, “What Makes Crime News?”; Rowbotham, Stevenson and Pegg, Crime News.4 Gekoski. Gray & Adler, “What Makes a Homicide”; Pritchard & Hughes, “Patterns of Deviance”; Reiner, Livingston & Adler, “No More Happy Endings?”5 Chermak, “Predicting Crime Story Salience”; Lundman, “Newsworthiness and Selection Bias”.6 Gekoski, Gray & Adler, “What Makes a Homicide”; Peelo et al, “Newspaper Reporting”; Pritchard & Hughes, “Patterns of Deviance”.7 Buckler & Travis, “Assessing the Newsworthiness”; Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, Race, Gender, and Newsworthiness; Johnstone, Hawkins & Michener, “Homicide Reporting”; Lundman, “Newsworthiness and Selection Bias”.8 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, Race, Gender, and Newsworthiness.9 Coleman, “Incorrigible Offenders”; Shapiro, Breaking the Codes.10 Greer, “News Media Victims”; Pritchard & Hughes, “Patterns of Deviance”; Sorenson, Manz & Berk, “News Media Coverage.”11 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, Race, Gender, and Newsworthiness.12 Gekoski. Gray & Adler, “What Makes a Homicide”.13 Soothill et al, “Homicide and the Media”.14 Chermak, “Predicting Crime Story Salience”; Greer, “News Media Victims”; Pritchard & Hughes, “Patterns of Deviance”; Sorenson, Manz & Berk, “News Media Coverage.”15 Danson & Soothill, “Child Murder”.16 Wykes, News, Crime and Culture.17 Chermak, Victims in the News.18 Statistics NZ a; Statistics NZ b.19 “A flaw in the law”, 6.20 Offenders Probation Act 1920, s20.21 “Local and General”, 6.22 Dahmen et al, “Covering Mass Shootings”; Johnston & Joy, “Mass Shootings”; Towers et al, “Contagion in Mass Killings”.23 Lankford, “Fame-seeking Rampage Shooters”; Pane, “Should Media Avoid”; Zarembo, “Are the Media Complicit”.24 Hardy & Gunn, “Information Provision”; McKenna, Thom & Simpson, “Media Coverage of Homicide”.25 Coleman, “Incorrigible Offenders”; Powell, The Ogress.26 Tyler, Killing Innocents.27 Wardle, “It Could Happen”.28 Flaounas et al, “Research Methods”; Wijfjes, “Digital Humanities”.29 Galtung & Ruge, “The Structure”.30 Gilchrist, “Newsworthy Victims?”31 We have excluded from inclusion the only case in the decade between 1900 and 1910, that of the hotel arson and associated homicides, which was anomalous as there were doubts about Minns’ involvement and the news coverage deviated to many other topics such as hotel fire safety.32 See n.1733 Pane, “Should Media Avoid”; Zarembo, “Are the Media Complicit”.34 Eisner, “Long-Term Historical Trends”, 121.35 Lundman, “Newsworthiness and Selection Bias”; Soothill et al., “Homicide and the Media”.36 Powell, The Ogress.37 Coleman, “Incorrigible Offenders”.38 Wykes, News, Crime and Culture.39 Mr A. C. Hanlon, 2.40 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, “Race, gender”.Additional informationNotes on contributorsFrancine TylerFrancine Tyler, Independent Scholar, Wellington, New ZealandF. Elizabeth GrayF. Elizabeth Gray (author to whom correspondence should be addressed), Massey Business School, Massey University, New Zealand; Email: f.e.gray@massey.ac.nz. 0000-0002-0612-3795Catherine StrongCatherine Strong, Independent Scholar, Wellington, New Zealand","PeriodicalId":44733,"journal":{"name":"Media History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2023.2280008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractResearch into historic media coverage of child-homicide cases in New Zealand between 1870 and 1930 reveals that giving prominence to the murderer, rather than the victim, was a long-standing and consistent newsroom practice. Across the six decades, the names of the accused were published three times as frequently as the names of the victims. The research further reveals that legislative changes restricting the media’s power to report name details of accused persons had no discernible effect on how frequently accused child killers were named in the period. However, particular factors such as the murderer’s relationship to the victim, the murderer’s gender, and the salaciousness of the crime, appear to have had some impact on the media’s decisions to name those involved.KEYWORDS: Crime reportingchild killinghomicidenaming patternsnews media Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Wood and Knepper, “Crime Stories”, 345.2 Sacco, “Media Constructions of Crime”, 141.3 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, Race, Gender, and Newsworthiness; Katz, “What Makes Crime News?”; Rowbotham, Stevenson and Pegg, Crime News.4 Gekoski. Gray & Adler, “What Makes a Homicide”; Pritchard & Hughes, “Patterns of Deviance”; Reiner, Livingston & Adler, “No More Happy Endings?”5 Chermak, “Predicting Crime Story Salience”; Lundman, “Newsworthiness and Selection Bias”.6 Gekoski, Gray & Adler, “What Makes a Homicide”; Peelo et al, “Newspaper Reporting”; Pritchard & Hughes, “Patterns of Deviance”.7 Buckler & Travis, “Assessing the Newsworthiness”; Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, Race, Gender, and Newsworthiness; Johnstone, Hawkins & Michener, “Homicide Reporting”; Lundman, “Newsworthiness and Selection Bias”.8 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, Race, Gender, and Newsworthiness.9 Coleman, “Incorrigible Offenders”; Shapiro, Breaking the Codes.10 Greer, “News Media Victims”; Pritchard & Hughes, “Patterns of Deviance”; Sorenson, Manz & Berk, “News Media Coverage.”11 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, Race, Gender, and Newsworthiness.12 Gekoski. Gray & Adler, “What Makes a Homicide”.13 Soothill et al, “Homicide and the Media”.14 Chermak, “Predicting Crime Story Salience”; Greer, “News Media Victims”; Pritchard & Hughes, “Patterns of Deviance”; Sorenson, Manz & Berk, “News Media Coverage.”15 Danson & Soothill, “Child Murder”.16 Wykes, News, Crime and Culture.17 Chermak, Victims in the News.18 Statistics NZ a; Statistics NZ b.19 “A flaw in the law”, 6.20 Offenders Probation Act 1920, s20.21 “Local and General”, 6.22 Dahmen et al, “Covering Mass Shootings”; Johnston & Joy, “Mass Shootings”; Towers et al, “Contagion in Mass Killings”.23 Lankford, “Fame-seeking Rampage Shooters”; Pane, “Should Media Avoid”; Zarembo, “Are the Media Complicit”.24 Hardy & Gunn, “Information Provision”; McKenna, Thom & Simpson, “Media Coverage of Homicide”.25 Coleman, “Incorrigible Offenders”; Powell, The Ogress.26 Tyler, Killing Innocents.27 Wardle, “It Could Happen”.28 Flaounas et al, “Research Methods”; Wijfjes, “Digital Humanities”.29 Galtung & Ruge, “The Structure”.30 Gilchrist, “Newsworthy Victims?”31 We have excluded from inclusion the only case in the decade between 1900 and 1910, that of the hotel arson and associated homicides, which was anomalous as there were doubts about Minns’ involvement and the news coverage deviated to many other topics such as hotel fire safety.32 See n.1733 Pane, “Should Media Avoid”; Zarembo, “Are the Media Complicit”.34 Eisner, “Long-Term Historical Trends”, 121.35 Lundman, “Newsworthiness and Selection Bias”; Soothill et al., “Homicide and the Media”.36 Powell, The Ogress.37 Coleman, “Incorrigible Offenders”.38 Wykes, News, Crime and Culture.39 Mr A. C. Hanlon, 2.40 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak, “Race, gender”.Additional informationNotes on contributorsFrancine TylerFrancine Tyler, Independent Scholar, Wellington, New ZealandF. Elizabeth GrayF. Elizabeth Gray (author to whom correspondence should be addressed), Massey Business School, Massey University, New Zealand; Email: f.e.gray@massey.ac.nz. 0000-0002-0612-3795Catherine StrongCatherine Strong, Independent Scholar, Wellington, New Zealand
熟悉与恐惧
摘要:对新西兰1870年至1930年间儿童凶杀案的历史媒体报道的研究表明,突出杀人犯而不是受害者是新闻编辑室长期以来一贯的做法。在过去的60年里,被告的名字被公布的频率是受害者名字的三倍。研究进一步表明,限制媒体报道被告姓名细节权力的立法变化,在这一时期对被指控的儿童杀手被点名的频率没有明显的影响。然而,一些特殊的因素,如凶手与受害者的关系、凶手的性别和犯罪的淫秽程度,似乎对媒体决定公布涉案人员的名字有一定的影响。关键词:犯罪报告;杀害儿童;杀人模式;新闻媒体披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1 Wood and Knepper,“犯罪故事”;345.2 Sacco,“犯罪的媒体建构”;141.3 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak,种族、性别与新闻价值;Katz,“犯罪新闻是什么?”罗博瑟姆,史蒂文森和佩吉,犯罪新闻。Gray & Adler,《What Makes a Homicide》;Pritchard & Hughes,《越轨模式》;赖纳,利文斯顿和阿德勒,“没有更多的快乐结局?5 Chermak,《预测犯罪故事的突出性》;Lundman,《新闻价值与选择偏差》,第6页格考斯基,格雷&阿德勒,《何为杀人》;Peelo等人,“报纸报道”;Pritchard & Hughes, <越轨模式>Buckler & Travis,《评估新闻价值》;Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak,种族,性别和新闻价值;约翰斯通、霍金斯和米切纳,《杀人报告》;Lundman,《新闻价值与选择偏差》Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak,《种族、性别和新闻价值》9 Coleman,《不可救药的罪犯》;夏皮罗:《打破密码》;格里尔:《新闻媒体受害者》;Pritchard & Hughes,《越轨模式》;Sorenson, Manz & Berk,《新闻媒体报道》。11 Gruenewald, Pizarro & Chermak,《种族、性别与新闻价值》,Gekoski。格雷&阿德勒,《杀人是什么》,第13页苏希尔等人,《凶杀与媒体》,第14页Chermak,《预测犯罪故事的突出性》;格里尔,“新闻媒体受害者”;Pritchard & Hughes,《越轨模式》;Sorenson, Manz & Berk,《新闻媒体报道》。15丹森&苏希尔,《儿童谋杀案》《新闻、犯罪与文化》17切尔马克,《新闻中的受害者》18新西兰统计局;新西兰统计局b.19“法律上的缺陷”、6.20《1920年罪犯缓刑法》、第20.21条“地方和一般”、6.22 Dahmen等人“报道大规模枪击事件”;Johnston & Joy,《大规模枪击》(Mass shooting);塔尔斯等人,《大规模杀戮中的传染》,第23页兰克福德(Lankford)的《逐名狂奔的射手》(Fame-seeking Rampage Shooters);窗格,“媒体应该避免”;Zarembo,“媒体是同谋吗?Hardy & Gunn,“信息提供”;麦肯纳,托姆和辛普森,《凶杀案的媒体报道》,第25页科尔曼,《不可救药的罪犯》;鲍威尔:《食人魔》泰勒:《杀害无辜》沃德尔:《有可能发生Flaounas et al,“研究方法”;《数字人文》,第29期Galtung & Ruge, <结构>,第30页吉尔克里斯特,“有新闻价值的受害者?31 .我们排除了1900年至1910年这十年间唯一的一个案例,即酒店纵火案和相关杀人案,这是不正常的,因为人们对明斯的参与存在怀疑,新闻报道也偏离了许多其他话题,如酒店消防安全看到n.1733窗格,“媒体应该避免”;Zarembo,“媒体是同谋吗”,第34页Eisner,“长期历史趋势”,121.35 Lundman,“新闻价值和选择偏差”;苏希尔等人,《凶杀与媒体》,第36页鲍威尔,《食人魔》,科尔曼,《不可救药的罪犯》《新闻、犯罪与文化》39 A. C.汉隆先生,2.40格林瓦尔德、皮萨罗和切尔马克,《种族、性别》。作者简介francine Tyler,独立学者,惠灵顿,新西兰。伊丽莎白GrayF。伊丽莎白·格雷(收件人:作者),新西兰梅西大学梅西商学院;电子邮件:f.e.gray@massey.ac.nz。catherine Strong,独立学者,惠灵顿,新西兰
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media History
Media History COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信