Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Penile Cancer: Is Sooner Better?

IF 0.4 Q4 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Tommaso Cai, Marco Capece, Maria Grazia Zorzi, Alessandro Palmieri, Gabriella Nesi, Mattia Barbareschi, Truls E. Bjerklund Johansen
{"title":"Prophylactic Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Penile Cancer: Is Sooner Better?","authors":"Tommaso Cai, Marco Capece, Maria Grazia Zorzi, Alessandro Palmieri, Gabriella Nesi, Mattia Barbareschi, Truls E. Bjerklund Johansen","doi":"10.3390/uro3040025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Management of penile cancer patients has its grey zones. In particular, no strong evidence or recommendations exist regarding the timing of prophylactic lymphadenectomy. Here, we aim to review the impact that the timing of inguinal and pelvic prophylactic lymph node dissection has on patient outcome. Methods: All relevant databases were searched following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. A narrative review of indications for lymph node dissection and pathological considerations precede a systematic review of the impact of prophylactic lymph node dissection timing on prognosis. The primary endpoint is disease-free and overall survival in patients undergoing early or late lymph node dissection after penile cancer diagnosis. Results: Four clinical trials, all focusing on the role of inguinal lymph node dissection, are included. Despite the lack of randomized and controlled trials, this review suggests that lymph node dissection should be performed as soon as possible after diagnosis, with 3 months as a realistic cut-off. Conclusions: Survival of penile cancer patients is strictly related to the timing of prophylactic pelvic lymph node dissection. All patients at high risk of nodal metastasis should be offered lymph node dissection within three months of diagnosis, until new predicting tools are validated.","PeriodicalId":44555,"journal":{"name":"Trudy Instituta Matematiki i Mekhaniki UrO RAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trudy Instituta Matematiki i Mekhaniki UrO RAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/uro3040025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Management of penile cancer patients has its grey zones. In particular, no strong evidence or recommendations exist regarding the timing of prophylactic lymphadenectomy. Here, we aim to review the impact that the timing of inguinal and pelvic prophylactic lymph node dissection has on patient outcome. Methods: All relevant databases were searched following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. A narrative review of indications for lymph node dissection and pathological considerations precede a systematic review of the impact of prophylactic lymph node dissection timing on prognosis. The primary endpoint is disease-free and overall survival in patients undergoing early or late lymph node dissection after penile cancer diagnosis. Results: Four clinical trials, all focusing on the role of inguinal lymph node dissection, are included. Despite the lack of randomized and controlled trials, this review suggests that lymph node dissection should be performed as soon as possible after diagnosis, with 3 months as a realistic cut-off. Conclusions: Survival of penile cancer patients is strictly related to the timing of prophylactic pelvic lymph node dissection. All patients at high risk of nodal metastasis should be offered lymph node dissection within three months of diagnosis, until new predicting tools are validated.
预防性淋巴结切除术治疗阴茎癌:越早越好吗?
背景:阴茎癌患者的管理存在灰色地带。特别是,没有强有力的证据或建议存在关于预防性淋巴结切除术的时间。在这里,我们的目的是回顾腹股沟和盆腔预防性淋巴结清扫的时机对患者预后的影响。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目检索所有相关数据库。在系统性回顾预防性淋巴结清扫时机对预后的影响之前,先对淋巴结清扫的适应症和病理考虑进行叙述性回顾。主要终点是在阴茎癌诊断后进行早期或晚期淋巴结清扫的患者的无病和总生存率。结果:纳入4项临床试验,均关注腹股沟淋巴结清扫的作用。尽管缺乏随机和对照试验,但本综述建议在诊断后应尽快进行淋巴结清扫,以3个月为实际截止时间。结论:阴茎癌患者的生存与预防性盆腔淋巴结清扫的时机密切相关。所有有淋巴结转移高风险的患者应在诊断后三个月内进行淋巴结清扫,直到新的预测工具得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信