The effectiveness and efficiency of using ChatGPT for writing health care simulations

Efrem Violato, Carl Corbett, Brady Rose, Benjamin Rauschning, Brian Witschen
{"title":"The effectiveness and efficiency of using ChatGPT for writing health care simulations","authors":"Efrem Violato, Carl Corbett, Brady Rose, Benjamin Rauschning, Brian Witschen","doi":"10.54531/wjgb5594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulation is a crucial part of health professions education that provides essential experiential learning. Simulation training is also a solution to logistical constraints around clinical placement time and is likely to expand in the future. Large language models, most specifically ChatGPT, are stirring debate about the nature of work, knowledge and human relationships with technology. For simulation, ChatGPT may present a solution to help expand the use of simulation by saving time and costs for simulation development. To understand if ChatGPT can be used to write health care simulations effectively and efficiently, simulations written by a subject matter expert (SME) not using ChatGPT and a non-SME writer using ChatGPT were compared. Simulations generated by each group were submitted to a blinded Expert Review. Simulations were evaluated holistically for preference, overall quality, flaws and time to produce. The SME simulations were selected more frequently for implementation and were of higher quality, though the quality for multiple simulations was comparable. Preferences and flaws were identified for each set of simulations. The SME simulations tended to be preferred based on technical accuracy while the structure and flow of the ChatGPT simulations were preferred. Using ChatGPT, it was possible to write simulations substantially faster. Health Profession Educators can make use of ChatGPT to write simulations faster and potentially create better simulations. More high-quality simulations produced in a shorter amount of time can lead to time and cost savings while expanding the use of simulation.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"51 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/wjgb5594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation is a crucial part of health professions education that provides essential experiential learning. Simulation training is also a solution to logistical constraints around clinical placement time and is likely to expand in the future. Large language models, most specifically ChatGPT, are stirring debate about the nature of work, knowledge and human relationships with technology. For simulation, ChatGPT may present a solution to help expand the use of simulation by saving time and costs for simulation development. To understand if ChatGPT can be used to write health care simulations effectively and efficiently, simulations written by a subject matter expert (SME) not using ChatGPT and a non-SME writer using ChatGPT were compared. Simulations generated by each group were submitted to a blinded Expert Review. Simulations were evaluated holistically for preference, overall quality, flaws and time to produce. The SME simulations were selected more frequently for implementation and were of higher quality, though the quality for multiple simulations was comparable. Preferences and flaws were identified for each set of simulations. The SME simulations tended to be preferred based on technical accuracy while the structure and flow of the ChatGPT simulations were preferred. Using ChatGPT, it was possible to write simulations substantially faster. Health Profession Educators can make use of ChatGPT to write simulations faster and potentially create better simulations. More high-quality simulations produced in a shorter amount of time can lead to time and cost savings while expanding the use of simulation.
使用ChatGPT编写医疗保健模拟的有效性和效率
模拟是卫生专业教育的重要组成部分,提供必要的经验学习。模拟培训也是解决围绕临床安置时间的后勤限制的一种解决方案,并可能在未来扩大。大型语言模型,尤其是ChatGPT,正在引发关于工作、知识和人类与技术关系的本质的争论。对于仿真,ChatGPT可以提供一种解决方案,通过节省仿真开发的时间和成本来帮助扩展仿真的使用。为了了解ChatGPT是否可以用于有效和高效地编写医疗保健模拟,比较了主题专家(SME)不使用ChatGPT和非SME作者使用ChatGPT编写的模拟。每组生成的模拟都提交给盲法专家评审。对模拟的偏好、整体质量、缺陷和生产时间进行全面评估。SME模拟被更频繁地选择用于实现,并且质量更高,尽管多个模拟的质量是相当的。为每组模拟确定了偏好和缺陷。基于技术精度考虑,中小企业仿真更受青睐,而ChatGPT仿真的结构和流程更受青睐。使用ChatGPT,可以更快地编写仿真程序。卫生专业教育工作者可以使用ChatGPT更快地编写模拟,并可能创建更好的模拟。在更短的时间内生成更多高质量的模拟可以在扩展模拟使用的同时节省时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信