Satrah Din, Satrah Saal: Media, Propaganda and Virtual Warfare in the India-Pakistan War of 1965

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Meher Ali
{"title":"‘ <i>Satrah Din, Satrah Saal</i> ’ <i>:</i> Media, Propaganda and Virtual Warfare in the India-Pakistan War of 1965","authors":"Meher Ali","doi":"10.1080/00856401.2023.2262288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe 1965 India-Pakistan War, also known as the Second Kashmir War or the ‘Seventeen-Day War’, is usually understood through the lens of military history, regional geopolitics and the long-standing ‘Kashmir question’. This article looks instead to the construction of social and political meaning around the conflict through an examination of the war’s mediatisation in Pakistan. An analysis of different media forms—including radio broadcasts, news dailies, press photography and popular poetry—reveals how a war imaginary was shaped by both domestic crises and global ideological dissension, extending beyond the notion of a timeless Indo-Pak enmity. Taking place at a pivotal moment in the global Cold War, public narratives were built upon not only state agendas but also popular concerns regarding militarism, sovereignty and the politics of aid. These framings ultimately illustrate the deeper entanglements that exist between war, media and mass publics—extending beyond the goals of wartime propaganda alone to produce new national imaginaries and collective subjectivities.Keywords: Cold WarIndiaKashmirmass publicsmedianationalismPakistanphotographypolitics of aidpropagandaradiowar AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank Gyan Prakash and Jeremy Adelman for comments on an early draft of this piece, as well as two anonymous reviewers for their rich and thoughtful suggestions. She would also like to thank Dawn and The Times of India for permission to reproduce select images, as well as the families of Faiz Ahmed Faiz and Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi for their permission to translate the poems included in this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1. See, for example, the Pakistan Army’s official history, published by the ISPR Directorate: Indo-Pakistan War 1965: A Flashback (Rawalpindi: ISPR Directorate, 1966). While the Indian government’s 1992 official history is more tempered, it has also pushed its own revisionist narrative of victory: Nitin Gokhale, 1965, Turning the Tide: How India Won the War (New Delhi: Centre for Land Warfare Studies, 2015). 2. During the British transfer of power in 1947, the Hindu monarch of Kashmir chose to accede to India in exchange for military assistance against tribal incursions from the Northwest. This led to war with Pakistan, the resolution of which divided the province into Indian and Pakistani territories. United Nations resolutions in 1948 and 1957 called for a plebiscite in Kashmir on the basis of self-determination, which never took place.3. Paul McGarr, The Cold War in South Asia: Britain, The United States and the Indian Subcontinent, 1945–1965 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013): 319.4. The Rann of Kutch is a largely uninhabited salt desert between the Pakistani province of Sind and the Indian state of Gujarat, the boundary of which became a source of territorial dispute soon after independence.5. Particularly in Pakistan, see Gulzar Ahmed, Pakistan Meets Indian Challenge (Rawalpindi: Al Mukhtar Publishers, 1967); Altaf Hasan Qureshi, Jang-e-Sitambar Ki Yaadein (Lahore: Jamhoori Publications, 2018).6. Particularly in India, see Rachna Bisht Rawat, 1965: Stories from the Second Indo-Pak War (New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2015); Dewan Berindranath, The War with Pakistan (New Delhi: Asia Press, 1966). 7. See Sumit Ganguly, The Origins of War in South Asia (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986); Sumit Ganguly, The Crisis in Kashmir: Portents of War, Hopes of Peace (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997); Subrata Mitra, ‘War and Peace in South Asia: A Revisionist View of India-Pakistan Relations’, Contemporary South Asia 10, no. 3 (2001): 361–79.8. Trade continued even during the first India-Pakistan war of 1948—it was not until the wars of 1965 and 1971 that trade became entangled with military concerns and irrevocably disrupted: see Michael Kugelman and Robert Hathaway, ed., Pakistan-India Trade: What Needs to be Done? What Does It Matter? (Washington, DC: The Wilson Center, 2013).9. Cultural interaction included ‘books, newspapers, films, joint mushairas and sports exchanges’: Rashid Ahmad Khan, ‘Friendly Exchanges and People-to-People Contact between Pakistan and India’, Strategic Studies 34, no. 2/3 (2014): 133–46; 136. 10. The 1965 war led to the closing of the Khokhrapar border as well as train services. That year, the international passport system was implemented to regulate travel across the border: see Vazira Fazila-Yacoobali Zamindar, The Long Partition and the Making of Modern South Asia: Refugees, Boundaries, Histories (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).11. William Mazzarella, ‘A Torn Performative Dispensation: The Affective Politics of British Second World War Propaganda in India and the Problem of Legitimation in an Age of Mass Publics’, South Asian History and Culture 1, no. 1 (2009): 1–24; 12, https://doi.org/10.1080/19472490903387183.12. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, rev. ed., 1991).13. A sampling of this scholarship over the years includes Francesca Orsini, The Hindi Public Sphere, 1920–1940: Language and Literature in the Age of Nationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002); David Lelyveld, ‘Sir Sayyid’s Public Sphere: Urdu Print and Oratory in Nineteenth Century India’, Cracow Indological Studies 11, no. 11 (2009): 237–67; Rama Sundari Mantena, ‘Vernacular Publics and Political Modernity: Language and Progress in Colonial South India’, Modern Asian Studies 47, no. 5 (2013): 1678–1705; Megan Eaton Robb, Print and the Urdu Public: Muslims, Newspapers, and Urban Life in Colonial India (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).14. J. Barton Scott and Brannon D. Ingram, ‘What Is a Public? Notes from South Asia’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 38, no. 3 (2015): 357–70; 360, This continues a conversation first initiated by Sandra Freitag’s influential special issue: ‘Aspects of “the Public” in Colonial South Asia’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 14, no. 1 (1991).15. As genealogies of the public have diversified, scholars have increasingly explored the effects of new technologies and medialities: see Aravind Rajagopal, Politics after Television: Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001); William Mazzarella, Censorium: Cinema and the Open Edge of Mass Publicity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013); Purnima Mankekar, Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of Television, Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999).16. Saadia Toor, The State of Islam: Culture and Cold War Politics in Pakistan (London: Pluto Books, 2011); Iftikhar Dadi, Lahore Cinema: Between Realism and Fable (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2022).17. Publishing and press networks (catering to an urban, literate class) were dislocated by the upheavals of Partition; in 1947, there were only four major newspapers published in Pakistan: Pakistan Times, Zamindar, Nawa-e-Waqt and Civil & Military Gazette. Two other important dailies, Dawn (the mouthpiece of the Muslim League) and Jang shifted from Delhi to Karachi in 1947. In the first decade of independence, 103 new dailies were founded.18. Irfan Waheed, ‘Print Culture and Left-Wing Radicalism in Lahore, Pakistan c. 1947–1971’ (unpublished PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, 2016): 206.19. Saima Parveen and Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti, ‘Freedom of Expression and Media Censorship in Pakistan: A Historical Study’, Journal of Historical Studies 4, no. 2 (2018): 1–21; 9.20. Nihal Ahmed, A History of Radio Pakistan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005): 133.21. ‘Broadcasting Body Set Up’, The Pakistan Observer, July 31, 1965: 2.22. Government of Pakistan, Report of the Broadcasting Committee, 1966, Dhaka, Bangladesh: 147. Copy in possession of Asif Munier.23. Abdus Salam Khurshid, ‘Mass Communication Media in Pakistan’, AMIC Travelling Seminar: 1st, Asia, Sep. 5–29, 1971 (Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center, 1971): 12.24. Zamir Niazi, Press in Chains (Karachi: Karachi Press Club, 1986): 117.25. Jan Mieszkowski, Watching War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012): 36.26. K.S. Mullick, Tangled Tapes: The Inside Story of Indian Broadcasting (Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1974): 159.27. Amarinder Singh and Tajindar Shergill, Monsoon War: Young Officers Reminisce (Mumbai: Roli Books, 2016): 36.28. Owen Sirrs, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate: Covert Action and Internal Operations (New York: Routledge, 2017): 52.29. ‘Revolutionary Council in Held Kashmir’, Dawn, August 9, 1965: 1. 30. ‘Khufia Radio Station “Sada-e-Kashmir” Ne Apna Kaam Shuru Kar Diya’, Nawa-e-Waqt, August 9, 1965: 1.31. ‘Aqwam Mutahidda ko Tehreek-e-Azadi par Izhaar Tashvish ka Koi Haq Nahi Hai’, Nawa-e-Waqt, August 12, 1965: 1; ‘Allah Is Our Source of Strength’, Dawn, August 12, 1965: 1; ‘India’s Barbarism Won’t End Struggle’, Dawn, August 27, 1965: 11.32. ‘Pakistanis Urged to Join Crusade’, Dawn, August 18, 1965: 1.33. ’It’s Undeclared War’, Dawn, September 4, 1965: 1. 34. Government of India, Radio & Television: Report of the Committee on Broadcasting and Information Media (New Delhi: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 1967): 125. 35. ‘Powerful Broadcast Transmitters Planned in India and Pakistan: A New Source of Friction’, March 1966, CIA Research Reports, Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, Folder 002711-006-0788.36. Rajesh Krishan Bhat, ‘Strategic Importance of Radio Kashmir in Countering Pakistan’s War of Words against India’, Strategic Analysis 37, no. 2 (2013): 171–77; 174. 37. ‘AIR Broadcasts Yet Another Lie’, Dawn, September 2, 1965: 8; ‘India’s Self-Delusion Won’t Alter Facts’, Dawn, August 14, 1965: 10; ‘Pak Allegations Are Denied’, The Times of India, September 30, 1965: 5.38. Alonso dedicates a chapter to the Radio Pakistan war campaign: Isabel Huacuja Alonso, ‘Radio Pakistan’s Seventeen Days of Drama’, in Radio for the Millions: Hindi-Urdu Broadcasting across Borders (New York: Columbia University Press, 2023): 143–68.39. ‘Bharati Akhbaraat ki Kaghazi Nao’, Imroz, October 25, 1965: 1; ‘Rajasthan mein Pachaas Lakh Afraad Qeht ka Shikaar Ho Jayenge: Times of India’, Nawa-e-Waqt, October 28, 1965: 2; ‘Times of India View: Indian Muslims being Treated as Inferiors’, The Pakistan Observer, August 12, 1965: 2.40. ‘Bharat mein Radio Pakistan Sunnay ki Momanat’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 11, 1965: 1; ‘Mujhe Bharathi Hamle ke Haq mein Khabron ki Tarseel par Majboor Karne ki Koshish Ki Gayi’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 2, 1965: 3.41. Geva writes about the endurance of the Urdu public sphere in post-Partition Delhi, noting that Muslim League papers in Pakistan continued to take an interest in editorial controversies from across the border: Rotem Geva, Delhi Reborn: Partition and Nation Building in India’s Capital (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022).42. Ibid., 139.43. ’Nation’s Security and Freedom Come First’, Dawn, August 2, 1965: 1. 44. ‘Rann Kutch ka Muahida Ala Tabaddur ka Shahkaar Hai’, Nawa-e-Waqt, July 1, 1965: 1; ‘US Aid Freeze Condemned’, The Pakistan Observer, August 13, 1965: 4.45. See Michael Brecher, ‘Non-Alignment under Stress: The West and the India-China Border War’, Pacific Affairs 52, no. 4 (1979): 612–30.46. Arms and equipment provided by the US in 1962 marked the first time that India had sought large-scale military assistance from a superpower. The news was unanimously condemned in Pakistan’s National Assembly, and mobs of protesters besieged American institutions (such as the USIS library) in multiple West Pakistani cities: McGarr, The Cold War, 160.47. Dawn, July 15, 1965: 1.48. ’Hints of Secret US, India Accord: Likely Basis of Delay in Aid to Pakistan’, Dawn, July 24, 1965: 1; ‘Bharat ke liye Do Gini Amriki Imdaad’, Nawa-e-Waqt, July 22, 1965: 3; ‘Ghalla, Ghalla aur Ghalla?’, Imroz, October 25, 1965: 3.49. ’India and the Atom’, Dawn, September 30, 1965: 8; ‘Shastri se Atom Bomb ka Mutalba’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 24, 1965: 4.50. ‘Pakistan to Play Leading Role in Africa and Asia’, Dawn, August 7, 1965: 10; ‘Pakistan Apni Azadi aur Khud Mukhtari ka Sauda Nahi Karega, Doosri Afro-Asia Conference mein Bharat ko Be-Niqaab Karenge’, Nawa-e-Waqt, July 14, 1965: 1.51. ‘People Urged to Resist Pressure by Imperialists’, Dawn, August 10, 1965: 6.52. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, July 14, 1965, in Awakening the People: A Collection of Articles, Statements and Speeches 1966–1969, ed. Hamid Jalal and Khalid Hasan (Rawalpindi: Pakistan Publications, 1972). 53. ‘Arabs Disillusioned about India’s Friendship’, The Pakistan Observer, September 25, 1965: 9; ‘Bharat ka Ala Kar Bannay ke Baad, Sadha Looh Sikhon ki Zaboon Hali’, Nawa-e-Waqt, August 25, 1965: 5.54. ’Indian Threat to Azad Kashmir: Situation Parallel with Vietnam’, Dawn, August 16, 1965: 1; ‘Kashmir ki Soorat-e-Haal Vietnam aur Malaysia se Ziada Khatarnak Hai’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 1, 1965: 8.55. ‘Khem Karan ke Ilaqai mein Bharati Fauj ke Chorey hue Amriki Aslah ke Box’, September 17, 1965: 1.56. ’1965 War Gallery’, Inter Services Public Relations, accessed June 1, 2022, https://ispr.gov.pk/1965-war-gallery.php.57. ‘Secret Indian Plot to Destroy Bridge’, The Pakistan Observer, October 18, 1965: 1; ‘Pakistan par Zabardast Hamla Karne ke Ek Aur Bharati Mansooba ka Inkishaf’, Nawa-e-Waqt, October 18, 1965: 1.58. For a discussion of allegory as a form of photographic signification, see Zahid R. Chaudhary, Afterimage of Empire: Photography in Nineteenth-Century India (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012).59. ‘Peshawar ke Kareeb Shehri Abadiyon par Bharati Bombari, Tasveer mein Ek Larka Apne Bache Kuch Samaan Par Betha Hai’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 18, 1965: 1; ‘Sargodha ke Kareeb Bharathi Bombari se Tabah Hone Wale Mukamaat Is Bombari Se Bees Shehri Shaheed Hue’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 19, 1965: 2; ‘A View of the Senseless Destruction Caused by Indian Air Force Planes which Bombed Civilian Population in Rawalpindi’, Dawn, September 8, 1965: 12.60. The newspaper as a key symbolic form for geopolitical projections of space has been explored by Edmond: Jacob Edmond, ‘Scripted Spaces: The Geopolitics of the Newspaper from Tretiakov to Prigov’, Slavic Review 75, no. 2 (2016): 299–330. 61. Mazzarella, ‘Torn Performative Dispensation’, 14.62. Ibid., 12.63. East Pakistan was left largely undefended during the days of combat; this is often cited as an additional source of resentment in the lead-up to the 1971 war: Ayesha Jalal, The State of Martial Rule (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990): 85.64. ‘Civils of Narayanganj are Preparing Themselves for Defense of the Motherland’, The Pakistan Observer, October 4, 1965: 3.65. Alonso’s chapter on 1965 includes a nuanced discussion of popular war songs, and the famous collaboration between Radio Pakistan and beloved singer and actress, Noor Jehan, who performed and recorded 12 songs back-to-back during the 17 days of war.66. Aijaz Ahmed, ‘In the Mirror of Urdu: Recompositions of Nation and Community, 1947–65’, in Lineages of the Present (New Delhi: Tulika, 1996): 219.67. The Rawalpindi Conspiracy Case was a plot against the government of Liaquat Ali Khan, which was discovered in 1951, in which several Left-wing politicians and intellectuals, including Faiz Ahmed Faiz, were implicated.68. Alamgir Hashmi, ‘Some Directions of Contemporary Urdu Poetry in Pakistan: From 1965 to the Present’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 1, no. 2 (1978): 67–79. 69. C.M. Naim, ‘The Consequences of Indo-Pakistani War for Urdu Language and Literature: A Parting of the Ways?’, The Journal of Asian Studies 28, no. 2 (1969): 269–83; 272.70. Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi, ‘6 September’, Naqsh, Jang Nambar (Karachi: 1966): 396, translation by author. 71. Ibid.72. Saiyid Faizi, ‘Satrah Din, Satrah Saal’, in Razm-o-Nazm (Rawalpindi: Pakistan Council, 1966): 33, reprinted in Faqir Hussain Shakir, Some Development in Urdu Poetry since 1936 (Unpublished Master’s thesis, Durham University, 1969): 223, translation by Faqir Hussain Shakir.73. Akram Tahir, ‘Qaum Bedaar’, Imroz, October 3, 1965: 2, translation by author.74. Ahmad Faraz, ‘Parcham Jaan’, in Shab-e Khun: Jang-i-Sitambar 65 se Mutalliq (Rawalpindi: Yusuf Publishers, 1979): 23, translation by author. 75. Ibid.76. Anjum Romani, ‘Ganjang India’, Imroz, October 2, 1965: 2, translation by author.77. Ibid.78. Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi, ‘Kashmir’, September 1965, reprinted in Muheet (Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications, 2012): 73, translation by author.79. Ibid.80. Rauf Parekh, ‘Literary Notes: The 1965 War and Pakistani Urdu Literature’, Dawn, September 7, 2015, accessed June 1, 2022, https://www.dawn.com/news/1205330.81. Naim, ‘Consequences’, 275.82. Michael Edwardes, ‘Tashkent and After’, International Affairs 42, no. 3 (1966): 383; ‘Demonstrations by Students’, The Pakistan Times, January 15, 1966: 8.83. ‘Pakistan Stands by Demand for Self-Determination, President Ayub’s Broadcast’, Dawn, January 15, 1966: 1; ‘Ordeal Not Yet Over: Ayub’s Call for Discipline’, The Pakistan Times, January 15, 1966: 1.84. Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005): 179.85. Faiz Ahmed Faiz, ‘Blackout’ (September 1966), in Nuksha ha-e Wafa (Lahore: Maktaba-e-Karavan, 2014): 409, translation by author.","PeriodicalId":46457,"journal":{"name":"South Asia-Journal of South Asian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asia-Journal of South Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2023.2262288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe 1965 India-Pakistan War, also known as the Second Kashmir War or the ‘Seventeen-Day War’, is usually understood through the lens of military history, regional geopolitics and the long-standing ‘Kashmir question’. This article looks instead to the construction of social and political meaning around the conflict through an examination of the war’s mediatisation in Pakistan. An analysis of different media forms—including radio broadcasts, news dailies, press photography and popular poetry—reveals how a war imaginary was shaped by both domestic crises and global ideological dissension, extending beyond the notion of a timeless Indo-Pak enmity. Taking place at a pivotal moment in the global Cold War, public narratives were built upon not only state agendas but also popular concerns regarding militarism, sovereignty and the politics of aid. These framings ultimately illustrate the deeper entanglements that exist between war, media and mass publics—extending beyond the goals of wartime propaganda alone to produce new national imaginaries and collective subjectivities.Keywords: Cold WarIndiaKashmirmass publicsmedianationalismPakistanphotographypolitics of aidpropagandaradiowar AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank Gyan Prakash and Jeremy Adelman for comments on an early draft of this piece, as well as two anonymous reviewers for their rich and thoughtful suggestions. She would also like to thank Dawn and The Times of India for permission to reproduce select images, as well as the families of Faiz Ahmed Faiz and Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi for their permission to translate the poems included in this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1. See, for example, the Pakistan Army’s official history, published by the ISPR Directorate: Indo-Pakistan War 1965: A Flashback (Rawalpindi: ISPR Directorate, 1966). While the Indian government’s 1992 official history is more tempered, it has also pushed its own revisionist narrative of victory: Nitin Gokhale, 1965, Turning the Tide: How India Won the War (New Delhi: Centre for Land Warfare Studies, 2015). 2. During the British transfer of power in 1947, the Hindu monarch of Kashmir chose to accede to India in exchange for military assistance against tribal incursions from the Northwest. This led to war with Pakistan, the resolution of which divided the province into Indian and Pakistani territories. United Nations resolutions in 1948 and 1957 called for a plebiscite in Kashmir on the basis of self-determination, which never took place.3. Paul McGarr, The Cold War in South Asia: Britain, The United States and the Indian Subcontinent, 1945–1965 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013): 319.4. The Rann of Kutch is a largely uninhabited salt desert between the Pakistani province of Sind and the Indian state of Gujarat, the boundary of which became a source of territorial dispute soon after independence.5. Particularly in Pakistan, see Gulzar Ahmed, Pakistan Meets Indian Challenge (Rawalpindi: Al Mukhtar Publishers, 1967); Altaf Hasan Qureshi, Jang-e-Sitambar Ki Yaadein (Lahore: Jamhoori Publications, 2018).6. Particularly in India, see Rachna Bisht Rawat, 1965: Stories from the Second Indo-Pak War (New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2015); Dewan Berindranath, The War with Pakistan (New Delhi: Asia Press, 1966). 7. See Sumit Ganguly, The Origins of War in South Asia (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986); Sumit Ganguly, The Crisis in Kashmir: Portents of War, Hopes of Peace (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997); Subrata Mitra, ‘War and Peace in South Asia: A Revisionist View of India-Pakistan Relations’, Contemporary South Asia 10, no. 3 (2001): 361–79.8. Trade continued even during the first India-Pakistan war of 1948—it was not until the wars of 1965 and 1971 that trade became entangled with military concerns and irrevocably disrupted: see Michael Kugelman and Robert Hathaway, ed., Pakistan-India Trade: What Needs to be Done? What Does It Matter? (Washington, DC: The Wilson Center, 2013).9. Cultural interaction included ‘books, newspapers, films, joint mushairas and sports exchanges’: Rashid Ahmad Khan, ‘Friendly Exchanges and People-to-People Contact between Pakistan and India’, Strategic Studies 34, no. 2/3 (2014): 133–46; 136. 10. The 1965 war led to the closing of the Khokhrapar border as well as train services. That year, the international passport system was implemented to regulate travel across the border: see Vazira Fazila-Yacoobali Zamindar, The Long Partition and the Making of Modern South Asia: Refugees, Boundaries, Histories (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).11. William Mazzarella, ‘A Torn Performative Dispensation: The Affective Politics of British Second World War Propaganda in India and the Problem of Legitimation in an Age of Mass Publics’, South Asian History and Culture 1, no. 1 (2009): 1–24; 12, https://doi.org/10.1080/19472490903387183.12. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, rev. ed., 1991).13. A sampling of this scholarship over the years includes Francesca Orsini, The Hindi Public Sphere, 1920–1940: Language and Literature in the Age of Nationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002); David Lelyveld, ‘Sir Sayyid’s Public Sphere: Urdu Print and Oratory in Nineteenth Century India’, Cracow Indological Studies 11, no. 11 (2009): 237–67; Rama Sundari Mantena, ‘Vernacular Publics and Political Modernity: Language and Progress in Colonial South India’, Modern Asian Studies 47, no. 5 (2013): 1678–1705; Megan Eaton Robb, Print and the Urdu Public: Muslims, Newspapers, and Urban Life in Colonial India (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).14. J. Barton Scott and Brannon D. Ingram, ‘What Is a Public? Notes from South Asia’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 38, no. 3 (2015): 357–70; 360, This continues a conversation first initiated by Sandra Freitag’s influential special issue: ‘Aspects of “the Public” in Colonial South Asia’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 14, no. 1 (1991).15. As genealogies of the public have diversified, scholars have increasingly explored the effects of new technologies and medialities: see Aravind Rajagopal, Politics after Television: Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001); William Mazzarella, Censorium: Cinema and the Open Edge of Mass Publicity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013); Purnima Mankekar, Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of Television, Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999).16. Saadia Toor, The State of Islam: Culture and Cold War Politics in Pakistan (London: Pluto Books, 2011); Iftikhar Dadi, Lahore Cinema: Between Realism and Fable (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2022).17. Publishing and press networks (catering to an urban, literate class) were dislocated by the upheavals of Partition; in 1947, there were only four major newspapers published in Pakistan: Pakistan Times, Zamindar, Nawa-e-Waqt and Civil & Military Gazette. Two other important dailies, Dawn (the mouthpiece of the Muslim League) and Jang shifted from Delhi to Karachi in 1947. In the first decade of independence, 103 new dailies were founded.18. Irfan Waheed, ‘Print Culture and Left-Wing Radicalism in Lahore, Pakistan c. 1947–1971’ (unpublished PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, 2016): 206.19. Saima Parveen and Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti, ‘Freedom of Expression and Media Censorship in Pakistan: A Historical Study’, Journal of Historical Studies 4, no. 2 (2018): 1–21; 9.20. Nihal Ahmed, A History of Radio Pakistan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005): 133.21. ‘Broadcasting Body Set Up’, The Pakistan Observer, July 31, 1965: 2.22. Government of Pakistan, Report of the Broadcasting Committee, 1966, Dhaka, Bangladesh: 147. Copy in possession of Asif Munier.23. Abdus Salam Khurshid, ‘Mass Communication Media in Pakistan’, AMIC Travelling Seminar: 1st, Asia, Sep. 5–29, 1971 (Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center, 1971): 12.24. Zamir Niazi, Press in Chains (Karachi: Karachi Press Club, 1986): 117.25. Jan Mieszkowski, Watching War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012): 36.26. K.S. Mullick, Tangled Tapes: The Inside Story of Indian Broadcasting (Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1974): 159.27. Amarinder Singh and Tajindar Shergill, Monsoon War: Young Officers Reminisce (Mumbai: Roli Books, 2016): 36.28. Owen Sirrs, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate: Covert Action and Internal Operations (New York: Routledge, 2017): 52.29. ‘Revolutionary Council in Held Kashmir’, Dawn, August 9, 1965: 1. 30. ‘Khufia Radio Station “Sada-e-Kashmir” Ne Apna Kaam Shuru Kar Diya’, Nawa-e-Waqt, August 9, 1965: 1.31. ‘Aqwam Mutahidda ko Tehreek-e-Azadi par Izhaar Tashvish ka Koi Haq Nahi Hai’, Nawa-e-Waqt, August 12, 1965: 1; ‘Allah Is Our Source of Strength’, Dawn, August 12, 1965: 1; ‘India’s Barbarism Won’t End Struggle’, Dawn, August 27, 1965: 11.32. ‘Pakistanis Urged to Join Crusade’, Dawn, August 18, 1965: 1.33. ’It’s Undeclared War’, Dawn, September 4, 1965: 1. 34. Government of India, Radio & Television: Report of the Committee on Broadcasting and Information Media (New Delhi: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 1967): 125. 35. ‘Powerful Broadcast Transmitters Planned in India and Pakistan: A New Source of Friction’, March 1966, CIA Research Reports, Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, Folder 002711-006-0788.36. Rajesh Krishan Bhat, ‘Strategic Importance of Radio Kashmir in Countering Pakistan’s War of Words against India’, Strategic Analysis 37, no. 2 (2013): 171–77; 174. 37. ‘AIR Broadcasts Yet Another Lie’, Dawn, September 2, 1965: 8; ‘India’s Self-Delusion Won’t Alter Facts’, Dawn, August 14, 1965: 10; ‘Pak Allegations Are Denied’, The Times of India, September 30, 1965: 5.38. Alonso dedicates a chapter to the Radio Pakistan war campaign: Isabel Huacuja Alonso, ‘Radio Pakistan’s Seventeen Days of Drama’, in Radio for the Millions: Hindi-Urdu Broadcasting across Borders (New York: Columbia University Press, 2023): 143–68.39. ‘Bharati Akhbaraat ki Kaghazi Nao’, Imroz, October 25, 1965: 1; ‘Rajasthan mein Pachaas Lakh Afraad Qeht ka Shikaar Ho Jayenge: Times of India’, Nawa-e-Waqt, October 28, 1965: 2; ‘Times of India View: Indian Muslims being Treated as Inferiors’, The Pakistan Observer, August 12, 1965: 2.40. ‘Bharat mein Radio Pakistan Sunnay ki Momanat’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 11, 1965: 1; ‘Mujhe Bharathi Hamle ke Haq mein Khabron ki Tarseel par Majboor Karne ki Koshish Ki Gayi’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 2, 1965: 3.41. Geva writes about the endurance of the Urdu public sphere in post-Partition Delhi, noting that Muslim League papers in Pakistan continued to take an interest in editorial controversies from across the border: Rotem Geva, Delhi Reborn: Partition and Nation Building in India’s Capital (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022).42. Ibid., 139.43. ’Nation’s Security and Freedom Come First’, Dawn, August 2, 1965: 1. 44. ‘Rann Kutch ka Muahida Ala Tabaddur ka Shahkaar Hai’, Nawa-e-Waqt, July 1, 1965: 1; ‘US Aid Freeze Condemned’, The Pakistan Observer, August 13, 1965: 4.45. See Michael Brecher, ‘Non-Alignment under Stress: The West and the India-China Border War’, Pacific Affairs 52, no. 4 (1979): 612–30.46. Arms and equipment provided by the US in 1962 marked the first time that India had sought large-scale military assistance from a superpower. The news was unanimously condemned in Pakistan’s National Assembly, and mobs of protesters besieged American institutions (such as the USIS library) in multiple West Pakistani cities: McGarr, The Cold War, 160.47. Dawn, July 15, 1965: 1.48. ’Hints of Secret US, India Accord: Likely Basis of Delay in Aid to Pakistan’, Dawn, July 24, 1965: 1; ‘Bharat ke liye Do Gini Amriki Imdaad’, Nawa-e-Waqt, July 22, 1965: 3; ‘Ghalla, Ghalla aur Ghalla?’, Imroz, October 25, 1965: 3.49. ’India and the Atom’, Dawn, September 30, 1965: 8; ‘Shastri se Atom Bomb ka Mutalba’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 24, 1965: 4.50. ‘Pakistan to Play Leading Role in Africa and Asia’, Dawn, August 7, 1965: 10; ‘Pakistan Apni Azadi aur Khud Mukhtari ka Sauda Nahi Karega, Doosri Afro-Asia Conference mein Bharat ko Be-Niqaab Karenge’, Nawa-e-Waqt, July 14, 1965: 1.51. ‘People Urged to Resist Pressure by Imperialists’, Dawn, August 10, 1965: 6.52. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, July 14, 1965, in Awakening the People: A Collection of Articles, Statements and Speeches 1966–1969, ed. Hamid Jalal and Khalid Hasan (Rawalpindi: Pakistan Publications, 1972). 53. ‘Arabs Disillusioned about India’s Friendship’, The Pakistan Observer, September 25, 1965: 9; ‘Bharat ka Ala Kar Bannay ke Baad, Sadha Looh Sikhon ki Zaboon Hali’, Nawa-e-Waqt, August 25, 1965: 5.54. ’Indian Threat to Azad Kashmir: Situation Parallel with Vietnam’, Dawn, August 16, 1965: 1; ‘Kashmir ki Soorat-e-Haal Vietnam aur Malaysia se Ziada Khatarnak Hai’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 1, 1965: 8.55. ‘Khem Karan ke Ilaqai mein Bharati Fauj ke Chorey hue Amriki Aslah ke Box’, September 17, 1965: 1.56. ’1965 War Gallery’, Inter Services Public Relations, accessed June 1, 2022, https://ispr.gov.pk/1965-war-gallery.php.57. ‘Secret Indian Plot to Destroy Bridge’, The Pakistan Observer, October 18, 1965: 1; ‘Pakistan par Zabardast Hamla Karne ke Ek Aur Bharati Mansooba ka Inkishaf’, Nawa-e-Waqt, October 18, 1965: 1.58. For a discussion of allegory as a form of photographic signification, see Zahid R. Chaudhary, Afterimage of Empire: Photography in Nineteenth-Century India (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012).59. ‘Peshawar ke Kareeb Shehri Abadiyon par Bharati Bombari, Tasveer mein Ek Larka Apne Bache Kuch Samaan Par Betha Hai’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 18, 1965: 1; ‘Sargodha ke Kareeb Bharathi Bombari se Tabah Hone Wale Mukamaat Is Bombari Se Bees Shehri Shaheed Hue’, Nawa-e-Waqt, September 19, 1965: 2; ‘A View of the Senseless Destruction Caused by Indian Air Force Planes which Bombed Civilian Population in Rawalpindi’, Dawn, September 8, 1965: 12.60. The newspaper as a key symbolic form for geopolitical projections of space has been explored by Edmond: Jacob Edmond, ‘Scripted Spaces: The Geopolitics of the Newspaper from Tretiakov to Prigov’, Slavic Review 75, no. 2 (2016): 299–330. 61. Mazzarella, ‘Torn Performative Dispensation’, 14.62. Ibid., 12.63. East Pakistan was left largely undefended during the days of combat; this is often cited as an additional source of resentment in the lead-up to the 1971 war: Ayesha Jalal, The State of Martial Rule (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990): 85.64. ‘Civils of Narayanganj are Preparing Themselves for Defense of the Motherland’, The Pakistan Observer, October 4, 1965: 3.65. Alonso’s chapter on 1965 includes a nuanced discussion of popular war songs, and the famous collaboration between Radio Pakistan and beloved singer and actress, Noor Jehan, who performed and recorded 12 songs back-to-back during the 17 days of war.66. Aijaz Ahmed, ‘In the Mirror of Urdu: Recompositions of Nation and Community, 1947–65’, in Lineages of the Present (New Delhi: Tulika, 1996): 219.67. The Rawalpindi Conspiracy Case was a plot against the government of Liaquat Ali Khan, which was discovered in 1951, in which several Left-wing politicians and intellectuals, including Faiz Ahmed Faiz, were implicated.68. Alamgir Hashmi, ‘Some Directions of Contemporary Urdu Poetry in Pakistan: From 1965 to the Present’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 1, no. 2 (1978): 67–79. 69. C.M. Naim, ‘The Consequences of Indo-Pakistani War for Urdu Language and Literature: A Parting of the Ways?’, The Journal of Asian Studies 28, no. 2 (1969): 269–83; 272.70. Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi, ‘6 September’, Naqsh, Jang Nambar (Karachi: 1966): 396, translation by author. 71. Ibid.72. Saiyid Faizi, ‘Satrah Din, Satrah Saal’, in Razm-o-Nazm (Rawalpindi: Pakistan Council, 1966): 33, reprinted in Faqir Hussain Shakir, Some Development in Urdu Poetry since 1936 (Unpublished Master’s thesis, Durham University, 1969): 223, translation by Faqir Hussain Shakir.73. Akram Tahir, ‘Qaum Bedaar’, Imroz, October 3, 1965: 2, translation by author.74. Ahmad Faraz, ‘Parcham Jaan’, in Shab-e Khun: Jang-i-Sitambar 65 se Mutalliq (Rawalpindi: Yusuf Publishers, 1979): 23, translation by author. 75. Ibid.76. Anjum Romani, ‘Ganjang India’, Imroz, October 2, 1965: 2, translation by author.77. Ibid.78. Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi, ‘Kashmir’, September 1965, reprinted in Muheet (Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications, 2012): 73, translation by author.79. Ibid.80. Rauf Parekh, ‘Literary Notes: The 1965 War and Pakistani Urdu Literature’, Dawn, September 7, 2015, accessed June 1, 2022, https://www.dawn.com/news/1205330.81. Naim, ‘Consequences’, 275.82. Michael Edwardes, ‘Tashkent and After’, International Affairs 42, no. 3 (1966): 383; ‘Demonstrations by Students’, The Pakistan Times, January 15, 1966: 8.83. ‘Pakistan Stands by Demand for Self-Determination, President Ayub’s Broadcast’, Dawn, January 15, 1966: 1; ‘Ordeal Not Yet Over: Ayub’s Call for Discipline’, The Pakistan Times, January 15, 1966: 1.84. Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005): 179.85. Faiz Ahmed Faiz, ‘Blackout’ (September 1966), in Nuksha ha-e Wafa (Lahore: Maktaba-e-Karavan, 2014): 409, translation by author.
“Satrah Din, Satrah Saal”:1965年印巴战争中的媒体、宣传和虚拟战争
1965年的印巴战争,也被称为第二次克什米尔战争或“十七天战争”,通常是通过军事史、地区地缘政治和长期存在的“克什米尔问题”来理解的。本文通过考察巴基斯坦战争的媒体化,转而关注围绕冲突的社会和政治意义的构建。对不同媒体形式的分析——包括电台广播、新闻日报、新闻摄影和流行诗歌——揭示了一场战争是如何被国内危机和全球意识形态分歧所塑造的,超越了印巴永恒敌意的概念。它发生在全球冷战的关键时刻,公众叙事不仅建立在国家议程上,还建立在民众对军国主义、主权和援助政治的担忧上。这些框架最终说明了战争、媒体和大众之间存在的更深层次的纠缠——超越了战争宣传的目标,产生了新的国家想象和集体主体性。关键词:冷战印度克什米尔大众大众媒体民族主义巴基斯坦摄影援助政治宣传战争致谢作者要感谢吉安·普拉卡什和杰里米·阿德尔曼对本文初稿的评论,以及两位匿名审稿人丰富而周到的建议。她也感谢《黎明报》和《印度时报》允许转载部分图片,并感谢Faiz Ahmed Faiz和Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi的家人允许翻译本文中的诗歌。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。例如,巴基斯坦军队的官方历史,由ISPR理事会出版:印巴战争1965:一个闪回(拉瓦尔品第:ISPR理事会,1966)。虽然印度政府1992年的官方历史更加温和,但它也推动了自己的胜利修正主义叙述:Nitin Gokhale, 1965,扭转潮流:印度如何赢得战争(新德里:陆战研究中心,2015)。2. 在1947年英国移交权力期间,克什米尔的印度教君主选择加入印度,以换取军事援助,以对抗来自西北部的部落入侵。这导致了与巴基斯坦的战争,该决议将该省划分为印度和巴基斯坦的领土。联合国1948年和1957年的决议要求在克什米尔举行以自决为基础的公民投票,但从未举行过。保罗·麦加尔:《南亚的冷战:英国、美国和印度次大陆,1945-1965》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2013):319.4页。库奇兰恩是位于巴基斯坦信德省和印度古吉拉特邦之间的一片荒无人烟的盐碱地,其边界在独立后不久就成为领土争端的根源。特别是在巴基斯坦,见Gulzar Ahmed,《巴基斯坦迎接印度挑战》(拉瓦尔品第:Al Mukhtar出版社,1967);6. Altaf Hasan Qureshi, Jang-e-Sitambar Ki Yaadein(拉合尔:Jamhoori出版社,2018)。特别是在印度,见《1965:第二次印巴战争的故事》(新德里:企鹅出版社,2015年);Dewan Berindranath,《与巴基斯坦的战争》(新德里:亚洲出版社,1966)。7. 参见Sumit Ganguly,《南亚战争的起源》(Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986);苏米特·甘古利,《克什米尔危机:战争的征兆,和平的希望》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,1997);苏布拉塔·米特拉:《南亚的战争与和平:印巴关系的修正主义观点》,《当代南亚》第10期,第2 - 6页。3(2001): 361-79.8。即使在1948年的第一次印巴战争期间,贸易也在继续——直到1965年和1971年的战争,贸易才与军事问题纠缠在一起,并不可挽回地中断了:见迈克尔·库格尔曼和罗伯特·哈撒韦主编的《巴基斯坦-印度贸易:需要做什么?》这有什么关系?(华盛顿特区:威尔逊中心,2013)。文化互动包括“书籍、报纸、电影、联合mushairas和体育交流”:拉希德·艾哈迈德·汗,“巴基斯坦和印度之间的友好交流和民间接触”,《战略研究》第34期。2/3 (2014): 133-46;136. 10. 1965年的战争导致了Khokhrapar边境和火车服务的关闭。那一年,国际护照制度开始实施,以规范跨境旅行:见瓦齐拉·法齐拉-雅库巴利·扎米达尔,《漫长的分治与现代南亚的形成:难民、边界、历史》(纽约:哥伦比亚大学出版社,2007年)。威廉·马扎雷拉,“一个撕裂的表演分配:英国在印度的第二次世界大战宣传的情感政治和大众公众时代的合法性问题”,《南亚历史与文化》第1期。1 (2009): 1 - 24;12日,https://doi.org/10.1080/19472490903387183.12。 “纳拉扬甘吉的公民正在为保卫祖国做准备”,《巴基斯坦观察家报》,1965年10月4日:3.65。阿隆索在1965年的章节中细致入微地讨论了流行的战争歌曲,以及巴基斯坦广播电台和受人喜爱的歌手兼女演员努尔·杰汗(Noor Jehan)之间著名的合作,后者在17天的战争中连续演唱和录制了12首歌曲。Aijaz Ahmed,《在乌尔都语的镜子里:1947 - 1965年民族和社会的重组》,载于《当代谱系》(新德里:Tulika出版社,1996),第219.67页。拉瓦尔品第阴谋案是1951年发现的一起反对利阿奎特·阿里·汗政府的阴谋,涉及包括法伊兹·艾哈迈德·法伊兹在内的几名左翼政治家和知识分子。Alamgir Hashmi,“巴基斯坦当代乌尔都语诗歌的一些方向:从1965年到现在”,《南亚:南亚研究杂志》第1期。2(1978): 67-79。69. 纳伊姆:《印巴战争对乌尔都语语言和文学的影响:分道扬镳?》《亚洲研究杂志》,第28期,第2。2 (1969): 269-83;272.70. Ahmad Nadeem Qasmi,《9月6日》,Naqsh, Jang Nambar(卡拉奇:1966):396,作者翻译。71. Ibid.72。Saiyid Faizi,“Satrah Din, Satrah Saal”,载于Razm-o-Nazm(拉瓦尔第:巴基斯坦委员会,1966年):33,转载于Faqir Hussain Shakir,《乌尔都语诗歌自1936年以来的一些发展》(未发表的硕士论文,Durham大学,1969年):223,由Faqir Hussain Shakir翻译,73。Akram Tahir,“Qaum Bedaar”,Imroz, 1965年10月3日:2,由作者翻译。艾哈迈德·法拉兹,《Parcham Jaan》,载于Shab-e Khun: Jang-i-Sitambar 65 se Mutalliq(拉瓦尔品第:优素福出版社,1979):23,作者翻译。75. Ibid.76。Anjum Romani,“Ganjang India”,Imroz, 1965年10月2日:2,作者翻译。Ibid.78。艾哈迈德·纳迪姆·卡斯米,《克什米尔》,1965年9月,转载于《穆希特报》(拉合尔:Sang-e-Meel出版社,2012):73,作者翻译。Ibid.80。raauf Parekh,“文学笔记:1965年战争和巴基斯坦乌尔都文学”,黎明,2015年9月7日,访问2022年6月1日,https://www.dawn.com/news/1205330.81。奈姆,《后果》,275.82。迈克尔·爱德华兹,《塔什干及其后》,《国际事务》42期,第2期。3 (1966): 383;《学生示威》,《巴基斯坦时报》1966年1月15日:8.83。“巴基斯坦支持民族自决的要求,阿尤布总统的广播”,黎明,1966年1月15日:1;“苦难尚未结束:阿尤布对纪律的呼吁”,《巴基斯坦时报》1966年1月15日:1.84。迈克尔·华纳,《公众与反公众》(普林斯顿,新泽西州:普林斯顿大学出版社,2005):179.85页。法伊兹·艾哈迈德·法伊兹,《停电》(1966年9月),载于Nuksha ha-e Wafa(拉合尔:Maktaba-e-Karavan出版社,2014年):409页,作者翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信