The impact of institutional child abuse: views of professionals

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Rebecca Ozanne, Jane L. Ireland, Carol A. Ireland, Abigail Thornton
{"title":"The impact of institutional child abuse: views of professionals","authors":"Rebecca Ozanne, Jane L. Ireland, Carol A. Ireland, Abigail Thornton","doi":"10.1108/jfp-06-2023-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to build on previous literature in this area thus, the views of professionals working with those who report institutional abuse was sought using a Delphi method. Design/methodology/approach Professionals working with those who report institutional abuse, such as psychologists, social workers and personal injury lawyers, were invited to engage in the Delphi study. Sixteen professionals completed the final round (with four rounds in total). This method was used to gain professional consensus on the considered impacts of institutional child abuse and what factors influence impacts. Findings Eight superordinate themes were developed, as follows: institutional abuse has lasting negative effects on well-being, functioning and behaviour; loss of trust in others and the system is a potential outcome of institutional abuse; negative impacts on future life chances; negative impacts of institutional abuse are exacerbated by numerous factors; protective factors reduced negative impacts; psychological intervention is useful for survivors; positive and negative impacts of disclosure – the response of others as important; and keep impacts individualised. Practical implications The need for an individualised approach when working with those reporting institutional abuse was a salient finding. Originality/value Institutional abuse is known to result in several negative impacts, although research into this area is limited with a need to better understand what may protect or exacerbate impacts.","PeriodicalId":44049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-06-2023-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to build on previous literature in this area thus, the views of professionals working with those who report institutional abuse was sought using a Delphi method. Design/methodology/approach Professionals working with those who report institutional abuse, such as psychologists, social workers and personal injury lawyers, were invited to engage in the Delphi study. Sixteen professionals completed the final round (with four rounds in total). This method was used to gain professional consensus on the considered impacts of institutional child abuse and what factors influence impacts. Findings Eight superordinate themes were developed, as follows: institutional abuse has lasting negative effects on well-being, functioning and behaviour; loss of trust in others and the system is a potential outcome of institutional abuse; negative impacts on future life chances; negative impacts of institutional abuse are exacerbated by numerous factors; protective factors reduced negative impacts; psychological intervention is useful for survivors; positive and negative impacts of disclosure – the response of others as important; and keep impacts individualised. Practical implications The need for an individualised approach when working with those reporting institutional abuse was a salient finding. Originality/value Institutional abuse is known to result in several negative impacts, although research into this area is limited with a need to better understand what may protect or exacerbate impacts.
机构虐待儿童的影响:专业人士的观点
本研究的目的是建立在该领域以前的文献基础上,因此,使用德尔菲法寻求与那些报告机构虐待的人一起工作的专业人员的观点。设计/方法/方法与那些报告机构虐待的人一起工作的专业人员,如心理学家、社会工作者和人身伤害律师,被邀请参与德尔菲研究。16名专业选手完成了最后一轮(共四轮)。该方法用于就机构虐待儿童的考虑影响以及影响影响的因素获得专业共识。制定了八个上级主题,如下:机构滥用对福祉、功能和行为具有持久的负面影响;对他人和制度失去信任是制度滥用的潜在后果;对未来生活机会的负面影响;许多因素加剧了制度滥用的负面影响;保护性因素减少了负面影响;心理干预对幸存者是有用的;信息披露的正面和负面影响——他人的反应同样重要;并保持个性化的影响。在与那些报告机构虐待的人合作时,需要采取个性化的方法,这是一个突出的发现。众所周知,制度滥用会导致一些负面影响,尽管对这一领域的研究有限,需要更好地了解可能保护或加剧影响的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Practice
Journal of Forensic Practice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信