The ABC of history education: a comparison of Australian, British and Canadian approaches to teaching national and First Nations histories

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Alison Bedford
{"title":"The ABC of history education: a comparison of Australian, British and Canadian approaches to teaching national and First Nations histories","authors":"Alison Bedford","doi":"10.1108/her-06-2022-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This essay engages with scholarship on history as a discipline, curriculum documents and academic and public commentary on the teaching of history in Australian, British and Canadian secondary contexts to better understand the influence of the tension between political pressure and disciplinary practice that drives the history wars in settler-colonial nations, how this plays out in secondary history classrooms and the ramifications this may have on students' democratic dispositions. Design/methodology/approach This article aims to compare secondary history curricula and pedagogies in Australia, Britain and Canada to better articulate and conceptualise the influence of the “history wars” over the teaching of national histories upon the intended and enacted curriculum and how this contributes to the formation of democratic dispositions within students. A conceptual model, drawing on the curriculum assessment of Porter (2006) and Gross and Terra's definition of “difficult pasts” has been developed and used as the basis for this comparison. This model highlights the competing influences of political pressure upon curriculum creation and disciplinary change shaping pedagogy, and the impact these forces may have upon students' experience. Findings The debate around what content students learn, and why, is fraught because it is a conversation about what each nation values and how they construct their own national identity(ies). This is particularly timely when the democratic self-identification of many nations is being challenged. The seditious conspiracy to storm the US Capitol on 6 January 2021, Orban's “illiberal democracy” in Hungary and the neo-Nazis in Melbourne, Australia are examples of the rise of anti-democratic sentiment globally. Thus, new consideration of how we teach national histories and the impact this has on the formation of democratic dispositions and skills is pressing. Originality/value The new articulation of a conceptual model for the impact of the history wars on education is an innovative synthesis of wide-ranging research on: the impacts of neoliberalism and cultural restorationism upon the development of intended curriculum; discipline-informed inquiry pedagogies used to enact the curriculum; and the teaching of national narratives as a political act. This comprehensive comparison of the ways in which history education in settler-colonial nations has developed over time provides new insight into the common elements of national history education, and the role this education can play in developing democratic dispositions.","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"128 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-06-2022-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This essay engages with scholarship on history as a discipline, curriculum documents and academic and public commentary on the teaching of history in Australian, British and Canadian secondary contexts to better understand the influence of the tension between political pressure and disciplinary practice that drives the history wars in settler-colonial nations, how this plays out in secondary history classrooms and the ramifications this may have on students' democratic dispositions. Design/methodology/approach This article aims to compare secondary history curricula and pedagogies in Australia, Britain and Canada to better articulate and conceptualise the influence of the “history wars” over the teaching of national histories upon the intended and enacted curriculum and how this contributes to the formation of democratic dispositions within students. A conceptual model, drawing on the curriculum assessment of Porter (2006) and Gross and Terra's definition of “difficult pasts” has been developed and used as the basis for this comparison. This model highlights the competing influences of political pressure upon curriculum creation and disciplinary change shaping pedagogy, and the impact these forces may have upon students' experience. Findings The debate around what content students learn, and why, is fraught because it is a conversation about what each nation values and how they construct their own national identity(ies). This is particularly timely when the democratic self-identification of many nations is being challenged. The seditious conspiracy to storm the US Capitol on 6 January 2021, Orban's “illiberal democracy” in Hungary and the neo-Nazis in Melbourne, Australia are examples of the rise of anti-democratic sentiment globally. Thus, new consideration of how we teach national histories and the impact this has on the formation of democratic dispositions and skills is pressing. Originality/value The new articulation of a conceptual model for the impact of the history wars on education is an innovative synthesis of wide-ranging research on: the impacts of neoliberalism and cultural restorationism upon the development of intended curriculum; discipline-informed inquiry pedagogies used to enact the curriculum; and the teaching of national narratives as a political act. This comprehensive comparison of the ways in which history education in settler-colonial nations has developed over time provides new insight into the common elements of national history education, and the role this education can play in developing democratic dispositions.
历史教育的ABC:澳大利亚、英国和加拿大的民族和第一民族历史教学方法的比较
本文结合历史作为一门学科的学术研究、课程文件以及澳大利亚、英国和加拿大中学背景下历史教学的学术和公众评论,以更好地理解政治压力和学科实践之间的紧张关系的影响,这种紧张关系推动了定居者-殖民国家的历史战争,这在中学历史课堂上是如何发挥作用的,以及这可能对学生的民主倾向产生的后果。本文旨在比较澳大利亚、英国和加拿大的中学历史课程和教学方法,以更好地阐明和概念化“历史战争”对国家历史教学对预期和制定的课程的影响,以及这如何有助于学生内部民主倾向的形成。一个概念模型,借鉴了波特(2006)的课程评估以及格罗斯和特拉对“艰难的过去”的定义,已经被开发并用作这种比较的基础。该模型强调了政治压力对课程创建和学科变革形成的教学方法的竞争影响,以及这些力量可能对学生体验的影响。关于学生学习什么内容以及为什么学习的争论令人担忧,因为这是一场关于每个国家的价值观以及他们如何构建自己的民族认同的对话。当许多国家的民主自我认同受到挑战时,这是特别及时的。2021年1月6日袭击美国国会大厦的煽动性阴谋,匈牙利欧尔班的“非自由民主”,以及澳大利亚墨尔本的新纳粹主义,都是全球反民主情绪上升的例子。因此,我们迫切需要重新考虑如何教授民族历史,以及这对民主倾向和技能形成的影响。原创性/价值历史战争对教育影响的概念模型的新表述是对以下广泛研究的创新综合:新自由主义和文化复兴主义对预定课程发展的影响;学科知情的探究教学法用于制定课程;以及将国家叙事作为一种政治行为的教学。这种对移民-殖民国家历史教育发展方式的全面比较,提供了对国家历史教育共同要素的新见解,以及这种教育在发展民主倾向方面所能发挥的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信