Laparoscopic IPOMPLUS repair-current outcomes and complications

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Konstantin Kostov, Vesselin Marinov, Stefka Ivanova, Mariya Chaneva, Petar Atanasov, Venceslava Atanasova
{"title":"Laparoscopic IPOMPLUS repair-current outcomes and complications","authors":"Konstantin Kostov, Vesselin Marinov, Stefka Ivanova, Mariya Chaneva, Petar Atanasov, Venceslava Atanasova","doi":"10.3897/pharmacia.70.e113883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : The study aims to assess the current outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM PLUS) technique by use of dual-sided synthetic mesh. Material and methods : Retrospectively clinical data for 27 patients with umbilical, paraumbilical, incisional, ventral, and primary hernia, operated in the Department of General, Visceral and Emergency Surgery “Pirogov” from 01.06.2022 to 01.06. 2022 was analyzed. The diagnosis was based on history, physical examination(mainly), ultrasound, and CT. Of the hospitalized, women were 16 (59.26%) men 11 (40.74%). Results : Of the selected group, 13 patients had umbilical defects, 3 with an epigastric hernia, 7 with a paraumbilical hernia, and 4 with incisional defects. Adhesiolysis was needed in 18 cases, while others were performed straight with hernia closure. The operating time varied between 49 and 127 minutes (average 57.4 minutes). The hospital stay ranged from 1 day to 4 days (average 1.7 days). We had noticed complications in three of the cases (11.11%). Conclusion : IPOM PLUS repair is safe, practicable, and advantageous over a standard IPOM or open repair as reported in the literature. Accordingly, we prefer this approach with the closure of the fascial defect first while repairing ventral abdominal wall hernias.","PeriodicalId":20086,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.70.e113883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose : The study aims to assess the current outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM PLUS) technique by use of dual-sided synthetic mesh. Material and methods : Retrospectively clinical data for 27 patients with umbilical, paraumbilical, incisional, ventral, and primary hernia, operated in the Department of General, Visceral and Emergency Surgery “Pirogov” from 01.06.2022 to 01.06. 2022 was analyzed. The diagnosis was based on history, physical examination(mainly), ultrasound, and CT. Of the hospitalized, women were 16 (59.26%) men 11 (40.74%). Results : Of the selected group, 13 patients had umbilical defects, 3 with an epigastric hernia, 7 with a paraumbilical hernia, and 4 with incisional defects. Adhesiolysis was needed in 18 cases, while others were performed straight with hernia closure. The operating time varied between 49 and 127 minutes (average 57.4 minutes). The hospital stay ranged from 1 day to 4 days (average 1.7 days). We had noticed complications in three of the cases (11.11%). Conclusion : IPOM PLUS repair is safe, practicable, and advantageous over a standard IPOM or open repair as reported in the literature. Accordingly, we prefer this approach with the closure of the fascial defect first while repairing ventral abdominal wall hernias.
Laparoscopic IPOMPLUS修复目前的结果和并发症
目的:评价采用双面合成补片腹腔内嵌补片缺损修补术(IPOM PLUS)腹腔镜腹疝修补术的临床疗效及并发症。材料与方法:回顾性分析2022年1月1日至2006年1月1日在Pirogov普通、内脏和急诊外科手术的27例脐、脐旁、切口、腹侧和原发性疝的临床资料。分析了2022年。诊断依据病史、体格检查(主要)、超声和CT。住院患者中,女性16例(59.26%),男性11例(40.74%)。结果:本组患者脐部缺损13例,腹上疝3例,脐旁疝7例,切口缺损4例。18例需要粘连松解,而其他病例则直接进行疝闭合。手术时间在49 ~ 127分钟之间(平均57.4分钟)。住院时间1 ~ 4天,平均1.7天。其中3例(11.11%)出现并发症。结论:与文献报道的标准IPOM或开放式修复相比,IPOM +修复是安全、可行和有利的。因此,在修复腹壁疝时,我们更倾向于先闭合筋膜缺损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacia
Pharmacia PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
27.30%
发文量
114
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信