L' « inné » et l' « épigénétique » : le dialogue de Kant avec Platon et Aristote

IF 0.6 0 PHILOSOPHY
Ubirajara Rancan de Azevedo Marques
{"title":"L' « inné » et l' « épigénétique » : le dialogue de Kant avec Platon et Aristote","authors":"Ubirajara Rancan de Azevedo Marques","doi":"10.5380/sk.v18i3.90198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to analyze the dialogue held between Kant and both Plato and Aristotle in his Reflexionen and Vorlesungsnachschriften. This dialogue will be examined from the positions which ascribe Plato and Aristotle the main sources of, respectively, innatism and sensualism. Although he refuses the dogmatic exclusivity of one and the other theories of representation, Kant still admits a form of innatism. Furthermore, he opts by epigenesis, an embryological theory whose bases had been cast by Aristotle. This course will allow us to underscore Kant's debt regarding certain crystallized versions of Plato's and Aristotle's philosophies, such as, for instance, Hissmann's published critique, recommended by Kant himself, of Dutens\" work: Recherches sur l\"origine des découvertes attribuées aux modernes.","PeriodicalId":40123,"journal":{"name":"Studia Philosophica Kantiana","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Philosophica Kantiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/sk.v18i3.90198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the dialogue held between Kant and both Plato and Aristotle in his Reflexionen and Vorlesungsnachschriften. This dialogue will be examined from the positions which ascribe Plato and Aristotle the main sources of, respectively, innatism and sensualism. Although he refuses the dogmatic exclusivity of one and the other theories of representation, Kant still admits a form of innatism. Furthermore, he opts by epigenesis, an embryological theory whose bases had been cast by Aristotle. This course will allow us to underscore Kant's debt regarding certain crystallized versions of Plato's and Aristotle's philosophies, such as, for instance, Hissmann's published critique, recommended by Kant himself, of Dutens" work: Recherches sur l"origine des découvertes attribuées aux modernes.
“先天”与“表观遗传学”:康德与柏拉图、亚里士多德的对话
本文旨在分析康德与柏拉图、亚里士多德在《反思与思考》一书中的对话。我们将从把柏拉图和亚里士多德分别视为先天主义和感官主义的主要来源的立场来考察这段对话。尽管康德拒绝任何一种表征理论的教条排他性,但他仍然承认一种形式的先天主义。此外,他选择了表观遗传,这是一种胚胎学理论,其基础是由亚里士多德奠定的。这门课将让我们强调康德在柏拉图和亚里士多德哲学的某些结晶版本上的贡献,例如,希斯曼发表的批评,康德自己推荐的,对杜登的作品:《研究与自由》的原初性,对现代的归因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信