Functions and forms of implementation of judicial power in the russian legal doctrine

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Justicia Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.17081/just.28.43.6166
Gyulnaz Adygezalova, Tatyana Faroi, Viktoria Kovalеva, Anna Yakovleva-Chernysheva, Oksana Morozova
{"title":"Functions and forms of implementation of judicial power in the russian legal doctrine","authors":"Gyulnaz Adygezalova, Tatyana Faroi, Viktoria Kovalеva, Anna Yakovleva-Chernysheva, Oksana Morozova","doi":"10.17081/just.28.43.6166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no unified understanding of the functions of the judiciary, as a rule in the Russian legal doctrine, the concepts of functions and forms of its implementation have not been differentiated, which predetermined the purpose of this study - to clearly delineate these concepts, considering the principle of separation of powers. The study was carried out using primarily dialectical, logical, and comparative methods of scientific knowledge. Research results are following: 1) the functions of the judiciary should be understood as the main directions of its implementation, manifested in its participation in the mechanism of state-power relations, including as a deterrent and counterbalancing factor for strengthening power by the legislative or executive branch to restore social justice; 2) justice should be recognized as a legal phenomenon that belongs to the category of legal means, because the judiciary protects the interests of legal entities, ensures the achievement of socially useful goals through justice; 3) all other types of judicial activity should be grouped into blocks of forms of implementation, depending on the directions of its manifestation in society. The function expresses the internal content of the phenomenon, in contrast to the form, which represents the external expression of the content, the way of its existence and implementation, while the concepts “forms of the implementation of the judiciary”, “powers”, “competence”, and “activities of the judiciary” should be recognized as synonymous.","PeriodicalId":41718,"journal":{"name":"Justicia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17081/just.28.43.6166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is no unified understanding of the functions of the judiciary, as a rule in the Russian legal doctrine, the concepts of functions and forms of its implementation have not been differentiated, which predetermined the purpose of this study - to clearly delineate these concepts, considering the principle of separation of powers. The study was carried out using primarily dialectical, logical, and comparative methods of scientific knowledge. Research results are following: 1) the functions of the judiciary should be understood as the main directions of its implementation, manifested in its participation in the mechanism of state-power relations, including as a deterrent and counterbalancing factor for strengthening power by the legislative or executive branch to restore social justice; 2) justice should be recognized as a legal phenomenon that belongs to the category of legal means, because the judiciary protects the interests of legal entities, ensures the achievement of socially useful goals through justice; 3) all other types of judicial activity should be grouped into blocks of forms of implementation, depending on the directions of its manifestation in society. The function expresses the internal content of the phenomenon, in contrast to the form, which represents the external expression of the content, the way of its existence and implementation, while the concepts “forms of the implementation of the judiciary”, “powers”, “competence”, and “activities of the judiciary” should be recognized as synonymous.
俄罗斯法律学说中司法权的功能与实现形式
对司法机关的职能没有统一的认识,通常在俄罗斯法律学说中,职能的概念及其实施形式没有加以区分,这就预先确定了本研究的目的- -考虑到三权分立原则,明确界定这些概念。这项研究主要使用科学知识的辩证、逻辑和比较方法进行。研究结果如下:1)司法职能应被理解为其实施的主要方向,表现为其参与国家-权力关系机制,包括作为立法或行政部门加强权力以恢复社会正义的威慑和制衡因素;2)司法应被视为一种属于法律手段范畴的法律现象,因为司法保护法律主体的利益,通过司法确保实现对社会有益的目标;3)所有其他类型的司法活动都应根据其在社会中的表现方向,划分为若干块的执行形式。功能表达的是现象的内在内容,而形式则代表内容的外在表达、存在方式和实施方式,“司法执行形式”、“权力”、“权限”、“司法活动”等概念应被视为同义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Justicia
Justicia LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信