Resilience in global supply chains: analysis of responses, recovery actions and strategic changes triggered by major disruptions

IF 7.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Maria Holgado, Alexander Niess
{"title":"Resilience in global supply chains: analysis of responses, recovery actions and strategic changes triggered by major disruptions","authors":"Maria Holgado, Alexander Niess","doi":"10.1108/scm-01-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Are major and frequent disruptions transforming global supply chains? This study aims to investigate how multinational companies (MNCs) are responding to the phenomenon of accumulated major disruptions in recent years and plausible new paradigm of unstable conditions and environmental uncertainty from a supply chain resilience (SCRES) perspective. Design/methodology/approach Following an inductive interpretivist approach based on interpretive phenomenology, this study gathers insights from ten MNCs supply chain managers and international consultants who participated as key informants via semi-structured interviews, sharing their experience of the phenomenon. Additionally, secondary sources such as press releases, media articles and industry reports were used for data collection. Findings Findings include five categories of recovery actions, i.e. levelling, rationing, buffering, bridging and boundary redefining, key strategic changes in competitive priorities, internal organisation and coordination structures, and a hierarchy between SCRES characteristics, integrated in an empirically derived conceptual framework connecting these constructs. This contributes to middle-range theories within SCRES body of knowledge. The authors also identify a set of areas for future SCRES research. Practical implications Findings can support MNCs’ supply chain professionals in designing and managing resilient global supply chains, based on learnings from the recent highly disruptive environment, particularly, regarding recovery actions and resilience-building strategic changes contributing to agility and robustness in global supply chains. Originality/value Non-positivist interpretive and inductive works are scarce in SCRES research. By adopting this novel approach for this field, the authors broadened the categorisation of responses used in previous works and identified prominent strategic changes and SCRES characteristics and relations among constructs, thus bringing conceptual clarity to SCRES research within the context of the study.","PeriodicalId":22057,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management: An International Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-01-2023-0020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Are major and frequent disruptions transforming global supply chains? This study aims to investigate how multinational companies (MNCs) are responding to the phenomenon of accumulated major disruptions in recent years and plausible new paradigm of unstable conditions and environmental uncertainty from a supply chain resilience (SCRES) perspective. Design/methodology/approach Following an inductive interpretivist approach based on interpretive phenomenology, this study gathers insights from ten MNCs supply chain managers and international consultants who participated as key informants via semi-structured interviews, sharing their experience of the phenomenon. Additionally, secondary sources such as press releases, media articles and industry reports were used for data collection. Findings Findings include five categories of recovery actions, i.e. levelling, rationing, buffering, bridging and boundary redefining, key strategic changes in competitive priorities, internal organisation and coordination structures, and a hierarchy between SCRES characteristics, integrated in an empirically derived conceptual framework connecting these constructs. This contributes to middle-range theories within SCRES body of knowledge. The authors also identify a set of areas for future SCRES research. Practical implications Findings can support MNCs’ supply chain professionals in designing and managing resilient global supply chains, based on learnings from the recent highly disruptive environment, particularly, regarding recovery actions and resilience-building strategic changes contributing to agility and robustness in global supply chains. Originality/value Non-positivist interpretive and inductive works are scarce in SCRES research. By adopting this novel approach for this field, the authors broadened the categorisation of responses used in previous works and identified prominent strategic changes and SCRES characteristics and relations among constructs, thus bringing conceptual clarity to SCRES research within the context of the study.
全球供应链的弹性:分析重大中断引发的响应、恢复行动和战略变化
重大和频繁的中断是否正在改变全球供应链?本研究旨在从供应链弹性(SCRES)的角度探讨跨国公司(MNCs)如何应对近年来积累的重大中断现象以及不稳定条件和环境不确定性的合理新范式。本研究采用基于解释现象学的归纳解释主义方法,通过半结构化访谈收集了十家跨国公司供应链经理和国际顾问的见解,他们作为关键信息提供者参与其中,分享了他们对这一现象的经验。此外,数据收集还使用了新闻稿、媒体文章和行业报告等二手来源。研究结果包括五类恢复行动,即平衡,配给,缓冲,桥接和边界重新定义,竞争优先级的关键战略变化,内部组织和协调结构,以及SCRES特征之间的层次结构,整合在连接这些结构的经验衍生概念框架中。这有助于在SCRES知识体系中形成中游理论。作者还确定了未来SCRES研究的一系列领域。研究结果可以帮助跨国公司的供应链专业人员设计和管理有弹性的全球供应链,基于从最近高度破坏性的环境中吸取的教训,特别是在恢复行动和弹性建设战略变革方面,有助于全球供应链的敏捷性和稳健性。在SCRES研究中,非实证主义的解释和归纳作品很少。通过在这一领域采用这种新颖的方法,作者扩大了之前作品中使用的反应分类,并确定了突出的战略变化和SCRES特征以及构式之间的关系,从而在研究的背景下为SCRES研究带来了概念上的清晰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Supply Chain Management (SCM) is a journal that places great emphasis on research findings with international relevance and global impact, benefitting both theory and practice. To be considered for publication, research papers and case studies submitted to SCM must contribute to extending supply chain knowledge beyond a dyadic perspective. The journal focuses specifically on empirical research and does not accept submissions related to modelling or simulation. This is because the challenges posed by globalization and rapidly evolving technology trends have a direct impact on supply chain design and management. Therefore, it is essential for contemporary supply chain practices to be responsive, proactive, integrated, and driven by information when managing the various components of the supply chain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信