Jonatas Silva de Oliveira, Amanda do Vale Sobral, Taysa Vannoska de Almeida Silva, Maria das Graças Wanderley de Sales Coriolano, Carla Cabral dos Santos Accioly Lins
{"title":"Removable dentures and electrical activity of masticatory muscles in individuals with Parkinson’s disease","authors":"Jonatas Silva de Oliveira, Amanda do Vale Sobral, Taysa Vannoska de Almeida Silva, Maria das Graças Wanderley de Sales Coriolano, Carla Cabral dos Santos Accioly Lins","doi":"10.1590/1982-0216/20232563423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: to assess the influence of dentures on the electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Methods: an analytical, quantitative, cross-sectional study conducted at a public teaching hospital in 2017, assessing the stage of the disease, non-denture (ND) wearing, upper removable partial denture wearing (DW1), upper and lower removable partial denture wearing (DW2), and upper complete denture + lower removable partial denture wearing (DW3). The Student-Newman-Keuls test was used to compare the maximum voluntary muscle contraction between sides and between the denture wearing and non-denture wearing groups. Significance was set at α<0.05. Results: after applying the eligibility criteria, 41 patient records were included in the sample. The association between the stage of the disease and denture wearing showed predominance of DW2 in stage 1 (43%). A significant difference was found in the masseter muscle analysis between the non-denture wearing group and DW2 and DW3 (p=0.0018). As for the anterior temporalis muscle, there was a significant difference (p=0.0034) in three of the analysis groups (ND vs. DW2, ND vs. DW3, and DW1 vs. DW3). Conclusion: denture wearing has a negative impact on the electrical activity of masticatory muscles when compared with individuals who do not wear dentures and have natural teeth.","PeriodicalId":53238,"journal":{"name":"Revista CEFAC","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CEFAC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232563423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: to assess the influence of dentures on the electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Methods: an analytical, quantitative, cross-sectional study conducted at a public teaching hospital in 2017, assessing the stage of the disease, non-denture (ND) wearing, upper removable partial denture wearing (DW1), upper and lower removable partial denture wearing (DW2), and upper complete denture + lower removable partial denture wearing (DW3). The Student-Newman-Keuls test was used to compare the maximum voluntary muscle contraction between sides and between the denture wearing and non-denture wearing groups. Significance was set at α<0.05. Results: after applying the eligibility criteria, 41 patient records were included in the sample. The association between the stage of the disease and denture wearing showed predominance of DW2 in stage 1 (43%). A significant difference was found in the masseter muscle analysis between the non-denture wearing group and DW2 and DW3 (p=0.0018). As for the anterior temporalis muscle, there was a significant difference (p=0.0034) in three of the analysis groups (ND vs. DW2, ND vs. DW3, and DW1 vs. DW3). Conclusion: denture wearing has a negative impact on the electrical activity of masticatory muscles when compared with individuals who do not wear dentures and have natural teeth.
目的:探讨假牙对帕金森病患者咀嚼肌肌电活动的影响。方法:2017年在某公立教学医院进行分析、定量、横断面研究,评估疾病分期、非义齿(ND)佩戴、上肢可摘局部义齿佩戴(DW1)、上肢和下肢可摘局部义齿佩戴(DW2)、上肢全口义齿+下肢可摘局部义齿佩戴(DW3)情况。采用Student-Newman-Keuls试验比较两组间、两组间假牙佩戴组与非假牙佩戴组间的最大随意肌收缩量。显著性设为α<0.05。结果:应用入选标准后,入选病例41例。疾病分期与假牙佩戴之间的关联显示DW2在1期占优势(43%)。非义齿佩戴组与DW2、DW3的咬肌分析差异有统计学意义(p=0.0018)。在颞前肌方面,三个分析组(ND vs. DW2, ND vs. DW3, DW1 vs. DW3)差异有统计学意义(p=0.0034)。结论:佩戴假牙对咀嚼肌电活动有负面影响,与不佩戴假牙和拥有天然牙齿的个体相比。