{"title":"Transitional Demands","authors":"Mark Bould","doi":"10.1353/sfs.2023.a900284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transitional Demands Mark Bould (bio) John Rieder. Speculative Epistemologies: An Eccentric Account of SF from the 1960s to the Present. Liverpool UP, 2021. vii+ 183 pp. $137.50 hc, $47.99 pbk. In Speculative Epistemologies, the author of the justly influential Colonialism and the Emergence of Science Fiction (2008) and Science Fiction and the Mass Cultural Genre System (2017) continues to destabilize and reorient our understanding of sf. And once more, he displays his uncanny knack for spotting those things bobbing and flickering in the corner of sf studies' eye, of gathering them together and placing them center stage, and of saying things about sf that immediately strike you as obvious and true—but only after he has said them. Rieder's new book is concerned with \"truth effects in sf\" (1). It explores the interrelation of mimesis and rhetoric, of representation and persuasion, in sf works that \"challenge dominant assumptions about the normal, the possible, and the real\"—hence, \"speculative epistemologies\"—but that have occupied the edges or, rather, some of the multiple \"epicenters\" of sf—hence, \"eccentric\"—since the 1960s (2). His six key examples, to each of which he devotes a chapter, are Pamela Zoline's \"The Heat Death of the Universe\" (1967), Leslie Marmon Silko's Ceremony (1977), Samuel R. Delany's \"The Tale of Plague and Carnivals\" (1985), Theodore Roszak's The Memoirs of Elizabeth Frankenstein (1995), Albert Wendt's The Adventures of Vela (2009), and Donna Haraway's \"The Camille Stories\" (2016). Clearly, then, what is on offer is not, as the subtitle of Brian Aldiss's Billion Year Spree (1973) was sometimes rendered, the true history of sf, or even just the history of sf. Instead, Rieder navigates the last half century of sf, which he understands both as a \"fluid, historically malleable\" discursive object and as many often interweaving and overlapping communities of knowledge and practice (3). His six exemplary texts do not merely \"flirt with generic boundaries\"—they are \"boundary objects\" that \"draw together\" these subcultures and thus \"foreground social struggles against the maintenance of dominant knowledge systems\" (3). At the same time, they express the \"marginalized and alternative ways of knowing\" associated with women (Zoline, Roszak), Indigenous communities (Silko, Wendt) and queer communities (Delany, Haraway) (4), and because the period that interests Rieder also features the rise of sf studies and its associated subculture(s), two of his authors are also career academics (Roszak, Haraway) (19). Moreover, all six texts are rooted in \"the civil rights and women's movements of the 1950s and 1960s and their legacy in the ongoing struggle against institutional [End Page 271] racism and sexism, and in the allied pursuit of environmental activism\"; they are \"positioned at the prolific intersections of multiple histories, communities and discourses\" (152). Consequently, in addition to providing detailed close readings, Rieder traces each text through its circuits of production, circulation, and reception, activating its relationship(s) with the different communities that (came to) understand it as sf. Zoline's \"The Heat Death of the Universe,\" for example, was first published in Michael Moorcock's New Worlds magazine and then promptly anthologized in both his Best S.F. Stories from New Worlds 3 (1968) and Judith Merril's England Swings SF (1968). Thus, it was first understood as exemplifying the way the New Wave \"challenged and modified previously accepted meanings of\" sf (21). It was subsequently anthologized, with an introduction by Brian Aldiss, in Robert Silverberg's The Mirror of Infinity: A Critics' Anthology of Science Fiction (1970), a story collection that also included commentary by both author-critics and scholar-critics (Kingsley Amis, Algis Budrys, James Blish, Thomas Clareson, H. Bruce Franklin, Damon Knight) and then, perhaps surprisingly, rejected from the sf canon in David Ketterer's scholarly New Worlds for Old: The Apocalyptic Imagination, Science Fiction, and American Literature (1974). These moves resituated Zoline's story in relation to different communities and contexts, where the wider literary significance of sf was being debated. Its anthologization in Pamela Sargent's The New Women of Wonder (1978) resituated it once more and much more explicitly in relation to second-wave feminism and feminist sf—a position reinforced, for example...","PeriodicalId":45553,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2023.a900284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transitional Demands Mark Bould (bio) John Rieder. Speculative Epistemologies: An Eccentric Account of SF from the 1960s to the Present. Liverpool UP, 2021. vii+ 183 pp. $137.50 hc, $47.99 pbk. In Speculative Epistemologies, the author of the justly influential Colonialism and the Emergence of Science Fiction (2008) and Science Fiction and the Mass Cultural Genre System (2017) continues to destabilize and reorient our understanding of sf. And once more, he displays his uncanny knack for spotting those things bobbing and flickering in the corner of sf studies' eye, of gathering them together and placing them center stage, and of saying things about sf that immediately strike you as obvious and true—but only after he has said them. Rieder's new book is concerned with "truth effects in sf" (1). It explores the interrelation of mimesis and rhetoric, of representation and persuasion, in sf works that "challenge dominant assumptions about the normal, the possible, and the real"—hence, "speculative epistemologies"—but that have occupied the edges or, rather, some of the multiple "epicenters" of sf—hence, "eccentric"—since the 1960s (2). His six key examples, to each of which he devotes a chapter, are Pamela Zoline's "The Heat Death of the Universe" (1967), Leslie Marmon Silko's Ceremony (1977), Samuel R. Delany's "The Tale of Plague and Carnivals" (1985), Theodore Roszak's The Memoirs of Elizabeth Frankenstein (1995), Albert Wendt's The Adventures of Vela (2009), and Donna Haraway's "The Camille Stories" (2016). Clearly, then, what is on offer is not, as the subtitle of Brian Aldiss's Billion Year Spree (1973) was sometimes rendered, the true history of sf, or even just the history of sf. Instead, Rieder navigates the last half century of sf, which he understands both as a "fluid, historically malleable" discursive object and as many often interweaving and overlapping communities of knowledge and practice (3). His six exemplary texts do not merely "flirt with generic boundaries"—they are "boundary objects" that "draw together" these subcultures and thus "foreground social struggles against the maintenance of dominant knowledge systems" (3). At the same time, they express the "marginalized and alternative ways of knowing" associated with women (Zoline, Roszak), Indigenous communities (Silko, Wendt) and queer communities (Delany, Haraway) (4), and because the period that interests Rieder also features the rise of sf studies and its associated subculture(s), two of his authors are also career academics (Roszak, Haraway) (19). Moreover, all six texts are rooted in "the civil rights and women's movements of the 1950s and 1960s and their legacy in the ongoing struggle against institutional [End Page 271] racism and sexism, and in the allied pursuit of environmental activism"; they are "positioned at the prolific intersections of multiple histories, communities and discourses" (152). Consequently, in addition to providing detailed close readings, Rieder traces each text through its circuits of production, circulation, and reception, activating its relationship(s) with the different communities that (came to) understand it as sf. Zoline's "The Heat Death of the Universe," for example, was first published in Michael Moorcock's New Worlds magazine and then promptly anthologized in both his Best S.F. Stories from New Worlds 3 (1968) and Judith Merril's England Swings SF (1968). Thus, it was first understood as exemplifying the way the New Wave "challenged and modified previously accepted meanings of" sf (21). It was subsequently anthologized, with an introduction by Brian Aldiss, in Robert Silverberg's The Mirror of Infinity: A Critics' Anthology of Science Fiction (1970), a story collection that also included commentary by both author-critics and scholar-critics (Kingsley Amis, Algis Budrys, James Blish, Thomas Clareson, H. Bruce Franklin, Damon Knight) and then, perhaps surprisingly, rejected from the sf canon in David Ketterer's scholarly New Worlds for Old: The Apocalyptic Imagination, Science Fiction, and American Literature (1974). These moves resituated Zoline's story in relation to different communities and contexts, where the wider literary significance of sf was being debated. Its anthologization in Pamela Sargent's The New Women of Wonder (1978) resituated it once more and much more explicitly in relation to second-wave feminism and feminist sf—a position reinforced, for example...
过渡要求马克·博尔德(传记)约翰·里德。思辨认识论:20世纪60年代至今科幻小说的古怪叙述。利物浦,2021年。Vii + 183页。137.50美元,每页47.99美元。在《思辨认识论》一书中,这位颇有影响力的《殖民主义与科幻小说的出现》(2008年)和《科幻小说与大众文化类型系统》(2017年)的作者继续动摇和重新定位我们对科幻小说的理解。再一次,他展示了他那不可思议的本领:发现那些在科幻小说研究者眼中闪烁的东西,把它们聚集在一起,放在舞台的中心,说出一些关于科幻小说的事情,让你立刻感到显而易见和真实——但只有在他说完之后。里德的新书关注的是“科幻小说中的真理效应”(1)。它探讨了科幻作品中模仿和修辞、再现和说服的相互关系,这些作品“挑战了关于正常、可能和真实的主流假设”——因此,“思辨认识论”——但自20世纪60年代以来,这些作品占据了科幻小说的边缘,或者更确切地说,占据了科幻小说的一些多个“中心”——因此,“古怪”(2)。他的六个关键例子,每个例子他都用了一章。分别是帕梅拉·佐琳的《宇宙的热死》(1967)、莱斯利·马蒙·西尔科的《仪式》(1977)、塞缪尔·r·德拉尼的《瘟疫与嘉年华的故事》(1985)、西奥多·罗斯扎克的《伊丽莎白·弗兰肯斯坦回忆录》(1995)、阿尔伯特·温特的《贝拉的冒险》(2009)和唐娜·哈拉威的《卡米尔的故事》(2016)。显然,书中所呈现的并不是科幻小说的真实历史,甚至不只是科幻小说的历史,就像布赖恩·奥尔迪斯(Brian Aldiss)的《十亿年狂欢》(Billion Year Spree, 1973)的副标题有时被渲染的那样。相反,里德在过去半个世纪的科幻小说中进行了导航,他将其理解为“流动的,历史上可延展的”话语对象,以及许多经常交织和重叠的知识和实践社区(3)。他的六个示范文本不仅仅是“与一般边界调情”-它们是“边界对象”,“汇集”这些亚文化,因此“前景社会斗争反对维持主导知识系统”(3)。他们表达了与女性(佐琳,罗斯扎克),土著社区(西尔科,温特)和酷儿社区(德拉尼,哈拉威)(4)相关的“边缘化和另类的认知方式”,因为里德感兴趣的时期也是科幻研究及其相关亚文化兴起的时期,他的两位作者也是职业学者(罗斯扎克,哈拉威)(19)。此外,所有六个文本都植根于“20世纪50年代和60年代的民权和妇女运动及其在反对制度性种族主义和性别歧视的持续斗争中的遗产,以及对环境行动主义的联合追求”;它们“位于多种历史、社区和话语的多产交叉点”(152)。因此,除了提供详细的细读外,里德还通过生产、流通和接受的回路追踪每一篇文本,激活它与不同社区的关系,这些社区将其理解为科幻小说。例如,佐林的《宇宙的热死》首先发表在迈克尔·穆尔科克的《新世界》杂志上,然后迅速被他的《新世界3》(1968)和朱迪思·梅里尔的《英格兰摇摆》(1968)选为最佳科幻小说选集。因此,它首先被理解为新浪潮“挑战和修改”sf的先前被接受的含义的方式的例证(21)。随后,它被编入罗伯特·西尔弗伯格的《无限之镜:批评家的科幻小说选集》(1970年),并由布莱恩·奥尔迪斯作了介绍,这本故事集还包括作家评论家和学者评论家的评论(金斯利·艾米斯、阿尔吉斯·布德利斯、詹姆斯·布利什、托马斯·克莱森、h·布鲁斯·富兰克林、达蒙·奈特),然后,也许令人惊讶的是,大卫·凯特勒的学术著作《旧的新世界》将其排除在科幻经典之外:《末世想象、科幻小说与美国文学》(1974)。这些举动将佐林的故事与不同的社区和背景联系起来,在那里,科幻小说更广泛的文学意义正在争论。帕梅拉·萨金特(Pamela Sargent)的《新奇迹女性》(The New Women of Wonder, 1978)将其选集再一次更明确地与第二波女权主义和女权主义社会联系起来——例如,这一立场得到了加强……