Lesbian Potentiality and Feminist Media in the 1970s by Roz Samer (review)

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
{"title":"Lesbian Potentiality and Feminist Media in the 1970s by Roz Samer (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/sfs.2023.a900291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Lesbian Potentiality and Feminist Media in the 1970sby Roz Samer Kathryn Heffner Fannish Feminisms. Roz Samer. Lesbian Potentiality and Feminist Media in the 1970s. Duke UP, 2022. xii+ 290 pp. $104.95 hc, $27.95 pbk. Lesbian Potentiality and Feminist Media in the 1970sby Rox Samer focuses on how potentials and futurity are expressed in lesbian feminist media. Texts and other cultural productions discussed include independent media in film, art, and fan works that articulate lesbian and feminist subjectivities. Samer draws on Giorgio Agamben's \"On Potentiality\" (1999) in their readings of feminist media-making in the 1970s, extending Agamben's framework of potentiality to closely examine how lesbian futures were articulated then. For Samer, potentiality intersects with other critical examinations of queer futurities and deserves consideration, whether or not these potentials come to fruition. In examining lesbian-separatist ideologies and the formation of lesbian activism in the 1970s, both potentials and failures of becoming are equally important. As Samer explains, \"these cultural texts engender new space-times from which women might love and live differently than they do in the present [End Page 297]but also suggest that the lesbian existence they envision need not come to be\" (18). Samer specifically focuses on attentive readings of lesbian independent media productions, including feminist sf fandom that solidified as a distinct counterpublic in the 1970s (141). Although works from other formative lesbian and feminist groups are identified, here I focus on the chapters that explicitly concern feminist sf fandom. In chapter three, \"Raising Fannish Consciousness: The Formation of Science Fiction Fandom,\" Samer examines the fanzines The Witch and the Chameleon(1974-1976), Aurora/ Janus(1975-1990), and Khatru's symposium on \"Women in Science Fiction\" (issues 3 and 4, 1975), exploring how fans engaged in a feminist critique. The chapter has two major emphases: the act of consciousness-raising for self-reflection and the use of humor in these fanzines. Samer closely attends to how fans in these explicitly feminist print networks incorporated consciousness-raising as part of fannish critique, then turns to examining how humor operates as a form of self-reflection and criticism of lesbian identities. Samer's work differs from prior investigations of fan-studies scholarship, as it specifically examines the emotional, embedded, and situated dialogues of women fans contesting images of women in science fiction. Perhaps the most effective investigation of fannish critique is Samer's exploration of letter columns in The Witch and the Chameleon. They note that Amanda Bankier, as the founder and editor of this Canadian fanzine, engaged a lesbian feminist readership with news, reviews, and information about feminist sf. A series of small case studies examines Bankier's comments and critiques about Andre Norton's work. Samer elaborates on how Bankier returned to reading Norton after reading her work as a child. Bankier critiques Norton's omission of lesbian identities in her fiction in a 1974 issue of The Witch and the Chameleonand Norton responds, claiming that she was bound to publishing standards and reviews from fans (sidestepping the fact that Bankier identified as a fan and lesbian). In addition to showing this dialogue between author and fan, Samer also discusses a similar case of fannish critique in commentary between Vonda McIntire and Marion Zimmer Bradley in another issue of the zine. Samer argues that the reviews modeled \"new forms of sf criticism\" exploring vulnerability and feminist ethics in 1970s feminist sf fandom (147). This \"new form\" adopts the prior fan behaviors of impassioned critique that would often initiate flame wars but differs in exploring the potentials of vulnerability and explicitly feminist ethics. I would have liked to see a gesture towards past proto-feminist sf fans and their critiques of gender and sex relations in earlier fandom in the discussion, but I understand that an emphasis on consciousness-raising in feminist fan circles in the 1970s would require a near impossible level of research. Samer also examines how feminist sf fanzines used humor as a way of forming a \"coherent and self-aware counterpublic\" (173). Specifically, they examine how humor impacted and shaped the formation of WisCon, the first feminist sf convention, held in Madison, Wisconsin in...","PeriodicalId":45553,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2023.a900291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Lesbian Potentiality and Feminist Media in the 1970sby Roz Samer Kathryn Heffner Fannish Feminisms. Roz Samer. Lesbian Potentiality and Feminist Media in the 1970s. Duke UP, 2022. xii+ 290 pp. $104.95 hc, $27.95 pbk. Lesbian Potentiality and Feminist Media in the 1970sby Rox Samer focuses on how potentials and futurity are expressed in lesbian feminist media. Texts and other cultural productions discussed include independent media in film, art, and fan works that articulate lesbian and feminist subjectivities. Samer draws on Giorgio Agamben's "On Potentiality" (1999) in their readings of feminist media-making in the 1970s, extending Agamben's framework of potentiality to closely examine how lesbian futures were articulated then. For Samer, potentiality intersects with other critical examinations of queer futurities and deserves consideration, whether or not these potentials come to fruition. In examining lesbian-separatist ideologies and the formation of lesbian activism in the 1970s, both potentials and failures of becoming are equally important. As Samer explains, "these cultural texts engender new space-times from which women might love and live differently than they do in the present [End Page 297]but also suggest that the lesbian existence they envision need not come to be" (18). Samer specifically focuses on attentive readings of lesbian independent media productions, including feminist sf fandom that solidified as a distinct counterpublic in the 1970s (141). Although works from other formative lesbian and feminist groups are identified, here I focus on the chapters that explicitly concern feminist sf fandom. In chapter three, "Raising Fannish Consciousness: The Formation of Science Fiction Fandom," Samer examines the fanzines The Witch and the Chameleon(1974-1976), Aurora/ Janus(1975-1990), and Khatru's symposium on "Women in Science Fiction" (issues 3 and 4, 1975), exploring how fans engaged in a feminist critique. The chapter has two major emphases: the act of consciousness-raising for self-reflection and the use of humor in these fanzines. Samer closely attends to how fans in these explicitly feminist print networks incorporated consciousness-raising as part of fannish critique, then turns to examining how humor operates as a form of self-reflection and criticism of lesbian identities. Samer's work differs from prior investigations of fan-studies scholarship, as it specifically examines the emotional, embedded, and situated dialogues of women fans contesting images of women in science fiction. Perhaps the most effective investigation of fannish critique is Samer's exploration of letter columns in The Witch and the Chameleon. They note that Amanda Bankier, as the founder and editor of this Canadian fanzine, engaged a lesbian feminist readership with news, reviews, and information about feminist sf. A series of small case studies examines Bankier's comments and critiques about Andre Norton's work. Samer elaborates on how Bankier returned to reading Norton after reading her work as a child. Bankier critiques Norton's omission of lesbian identities in her fiction in a 1974 issue of The Witch and the Chameleonand Norton responds, claiming that she was bound to publishing standards and reviews from fans (sidestepping the fact that Bankier identified as a fan and lesbian). In addition to showing this dialogue between author and fan, Samer also discusses a similar case of fannish critique in commentary between Vonda McIntire and Marion Zimmer Bradley in another issue of the zine. Samer argues that the reviews modeled "new forms of sf criticism" exploring vulnerability and feminist ethics in 1970s feminist sf fandom (147). This "new form" adopts the prior fan behaviors of impassioned critique that would often initiate flame wars but differs in exploring the potentials of vulnerability and explicitly feminist ethics. I would have liked to see a gesture towards past proto-feminist sf fans and their critiques of gender and sex relations in earlier fandom in the discussion, but I understand that an emphasis on consciousness-raising in feminist fan circles in the 1970s would require a near impossible level of research. Samer also examines how feminist sf fanzines used humor as a way of forming a "coherent and self-aware counterpublic" (173). Specifically, they examine how humor impacted and shaped the formation of WisCon, the first feminist sf convention, held in Madison, Wisconsin in...
《20世纪70年代的女同性恋潜能与女权主义媒体》罗兹·萨默著(书评)
书评:女同性恋的潜力和女权主义媒体在20世纪70年代,作者:罗兹·萨默,凯瑟琳·赫夫纳·范尼什女权主义。警察沉着的。20世纪70年代的女同性恋潜能和女权主义媒体。杜克大学,2022年。12 + 290页。104.95美元,每页27.95美元。Rox Samer的《20世纪70年代的女同性恋潜能与女权主义媒体》关注的是女同性恋女权主义媒体如何表达潜能和未来。讨论的文本和其他文化产品包括电影、艺术和粉丝作品中的独立媒体,这些作品表达了女同性恋和女权主义者的主体性。Samer借鉴了Giorgio Agamben的《论潜能》(on Potentiality, 1999),解读了20世纪70年代的女权主义媒体制造,扩展了Agamben的潜能框架,仔细研究了当时女同性恋的未来是如何被表达出来的。对于Samer来说,潜能与其他对酷儿未来的批判性研究交叉,值得考虑,不管这些潜能是否会实现。在研究20世纪70年代女同性恋分离主义意识形态和女同性恋激进主义的形成时,成为的潜力和失败同样重要。正如萨默解释的那样,“这些文化文本产生了新的时空,在那里,女性可能会以与现在不同的方式去爱和生活[End Page 297],但也表明,她们设想的女同性恋生活不一定会成为现实”(18)。Samer特别关注于对女同性恋独立媒体作品的仔细解读,包括在20世纪70年代固化为一种独特的反公众的女权主义科幻狂热(141)。虽然也提到了其他女同性恋和女权主义团体的作品,但在这里,我主要关注那些明确涉及女权主义科幻小说的章节。在第三章“提高粉丝意识:科幻迷团的形成”中,萨默考察了迷团杂志《女巫与变色龙》(1974-1976)、《极光/ Janus》(1975-1990)和卡特鲁关于“科幻小说中的女性”的研讨会(1975年第3期和第4期),探讨了迷团如何参与女权主义批评。这一章有两个重点:提高自我反省意识的行为和幽默在这些杂志中的运用。Samer密切关注这些明确的女权主义印刷网络中的粉丝如何将意识提升作为范尼式批评的一部分,然后转向研究幽默如何作为一种自我反思和对女同性恋身份的批评。萨默的研究不同于之前对粉丝研究的研究,因为它专门研究了女性粉丝对科幻小说中女性形象的情感、内在和情境对话。也许对范尼式批评最有效的研究是萨默在《女巫与变色龙》中对信件专栏的探索。他们注意到,阿曼达·班吉尔作为这本加拿大粉丝杂志的创始人和编辑,用关于女权主义科幻小说的新闻、评论和信息吸引了一群女同性恋女权主义读者。一系列小型案例研究考察了班吉尔对安德烈·诺顿作品的评论和批评。萨默详细阐述了班吉尔在小时候读过她的作品后是如何重新阅读诺顿的。班吉尔在1974年出版的《女巫与变色龙》中批评诺顿在小说中省略了女同性恋身份,诺顿回应说,她必须遵守出版标准和粉丝的评论(回避了班吉尔既是粉丝又是女同性恋的事实)。除了展示作者和粉丝之间的对话,萨默还在另一期杂志中讨论了冯达·麦金太尔和马里昂·齐默·布拉德利之间的评论中类似的范尼式批评。萨默认为,这些评论模拟了“新形式的科幻批评”,探索了20世纪70年代女权主义科幻爱好者的脆弱性和女权主义伦理(147)。这种“新形式”采用了之前的粉丝行为,即慷慨激昂的批评,这种批评往往会引发激烈的战争,但在探索脆弱性的潜力和明确的女权主义伦理方面有所不同。我希望在讨论中看到对过去的原始女权主义科幻迷的姿态,以及他们对早期粉丝圈中性别和性关系的批评,但我明白,在20世纪70年代强调女权主义粉丝圈的意识提高,需要一个几乎不可能的研究水平。萨默还研究了女权主义科幻杂志是如何利用幽默作为一种形成“连贯的、有自我意识的反公众”的方式的。具体来说,他们研究了幽默是如何影响和塑造威斯康星大学的形成的,威斯康星大学是第一届女权主义科幻大会,在威斯康星州的麦迪逊举行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信