Psychometric properties of the Cultural Intelligence Scale based on item response theory

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Eqbal Darandari, Shatha Khayat
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Cultural Intelligence Scale based on item response theory","authors":"Eqbal Darandari,&nbsp;Shatha Khayat","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.12451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS), based on item response theory (IRT) using the graded response model (GRM). The study calibration sample included 400, while the study sample included 1000, male and female Saudi participants, aged between 18 and 62 years. IRT-GRM results supported the quality of the psychometric properties of CQS, and its appropriateness to measure cultural intelligence (CQ) for the majority of individuals. CQS well-distinguished people at different ability levels along the CQ latent trait, particularly with middle and low abilities. However, CQS full scale and subscales had less accurate measurement precision at high levels of CQ, and some subscales had more precision at low level abilities. CQS items had medium ability to differentiate among subjects, and they provided more information in evaluating individuals with medium CQ. Therefore, CQS might be more suitable for identification and development purposes, where low to med-levels of CQ are expected. Additional assessment procedures need to be added, for selection or promotion purposes to increase the measurement precision. Confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed the multidimensional construct of CQS with four specific-related factors at the first level, and an aggregate factor at the second level. This model provided better model fit using IRT-GRM approach, and it was supported by classical test theory analysis results. Therefore, it is important to rely on subscale scores, besides the total score to interpret CQ for individuals. The study stressed the importance of examining CQS item parameters and information based on the country it is adapted for, to investigate how they interact with country culture; and to take into account ability level, when selecting optimal measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"32 1","pages":"108-137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS), based on item response theory (IRT) using the graded response model (GRM). The study calibration sample included 400, while the study sample included 1000, male and female Saudi participants, aged between 18 and 62 years. IRT-GRM results supported the quality of the psychometric properties of CQS, and its appropriateness to measure cultural intelligence (CQ) for the majority of individuals. CQS well-distinguished people at different ability levels along the CQ latent trait, particularly with middle and low abilities. However, CQS full scale and subscales had less accurate measurement precision at high levels of CQ, and some subscales had more precision at low level abilities. CQS items had medium ability to differentiate among subjects, and they provided more information in evaluating individuals with medium CQ. Therefore, CQS might be more suitable for identification and development purposes, where low to med-levels of CQ are expected. Additional assessment procedures need to be added, for selection or promotion purposes to increase the measurement precision. Confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed the multidimensional construct of CQS with four specific-related factors at the first level, and an aggregate factor at the second level. This model provided better model fit using IRT-GRM approach, and it was supported by classical test theory analysis results. Therefore, it is important to rely on subscale scores, besides the total score to interpret CQ for individuals. The study stressed the importance of examining CQS item parameters and information based on the country it is adapted for, to investigate how they interact with country culture; and to take into account ability level, when selecting optimal measures.

基于项目反应理论的文化智能量表的心理计量特性
本研究的目的是以项目反应理论(IRT)为基础,采用分级反应模型(GRM),调查文化智能量表(CQS)的心理测量特性。研究校准样本包括 400 人,研究样本包括 1000 名沙特男女参与者,年龄在 18 岁至 62 岁之间。IRT-GRM 的结果证明了 CQS 心理测量学特性的质量,以及它适合测量大多数人的文化智能(CQ)。CQS能很好地区分CQ潜特质上不同能力水平的人,尤其是中低能力水平的人。然而,CQS 的全量表和分量表在 CQ 水平较高时测量精度较低,某些分量表在能力水平较低时测量精度较高。CQS 题项对被试的区分能力中等,在评价中等 CQ 的个体时能提供更多信息。因此,CQS 可能更适用于鉴定和发展目的,即预期具有中低水平 CQ 的人。在选拔或晋升方面,还需要增加其他评估程序,以提高测量精度。确认性因子分析结果证实了 CQS 的多维结构,第一层次有四个具体相关因子,第二层次有一个综合因子。该模型使用 IRT-GRM 方法提供了更好的模型拟合度,并得到了经典测试理论分析结果的支持。因此,除了总分之外,依靠分量表得分来解释个人的 CQ 也很重要。该研究强调了根据适用国家研究 CQS 项目参数和信息的重要性,以研究它们如何与国家文化相互作用;并在选择最佳测量方法时考虑能力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信