The evaluation of the processes of problem based learning tutorials: Online or face-to-face?

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Albena GAYEF, Ozge EMRE, Esra AKDENİZ, Mehmet Ali GÜLPINAR
{"title":"The evaluation of the processes of problem based learning tutorials: Online or face-to-face?","authors":"Albena GAYEF, Ozge EMRE, Esra AKDENİZ, Mehmet Ali GÜLPINAR","doi":"10.5472/marumj.1378475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this research is to evaluate e-PBL tutorials and compare these sessions with face-to-face PBL sessions.
 Patients and Methods: This research is a program evaluation study in which quantitative methods were used. In the research, four
 90-minute e-PBL sessions held between April and June 2020 were evaluated. Sessions conducted online were realised using the sevenstep
 approach in groups of 13-14 students and a tutor. Video recordings were analysed with the thin slicing method. In addition,
 various quantitative data on evaluation were analysed using multiple tools and materials, including the end-of-program evaluation
 form. Friedman test and Mann-Whitney U test were used in the analyses of quantitative data.
 Results: Upon evaluating the analyses of the feedback received from the students about the structure, content and process of the
 program regarding the e-PBL tutorials, the students gave a positive opinion of 80% or more. In regards with the cases, the students
 had positive opinions of over 80% in terms of “motivation for learning and researching”, “daily life and its relation to their individual
 development”, “suitability to their levels of knowledge and skills”, “reinforcement of topics”. Support, guidance and feedback received
 from the tutor as a group and individually during online tutorials were statistically significantly higher than the face-to-face PBL
 tutorials (P","PeriodicalId":43341,"journal":{"name":"Marmara Medical Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marmara Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1378475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this research is to evaluate e-PBL tutorials and compare these sessions with face-to-face PBL sessions. Patients and Methods: This research is a program evaluation study in which quantitative methods were used. In the research, four 90-minute e-PBL sessions held between April and June 2020 were evaluated. Sessions conducted online were realised using the sevenstep approach in groups of 13-14 students and a tutor. Video recordings were analysed with the thin slicing method. In addition, various quantitative data on evaluation were analysed using multiple tools and materials, including the end-of-program evaluation form. Friedman test and Mann-Whitney U test were used in the analyses of quantitative data. Results: Upon evaluating the analyses of the feedback received from the students about the structure, content and process of the program regarding the e-PBL tutorials, the students gave a positive opinion of 80% or more. In regards with the cases, the students had positive opinions of over 80% in terms of “motivation for learning and researching”, “daily life and its relation to their individual development”, “suitability to their levels of knowledge and skills”, “reinforcement of topics”. Support, guidance and feedback received from the tutor as a group and individually during online tutorials were statistically significantly higher than the face-to-face PBL tutorials (P
基于问题的学习辅导过程的评估:在线还是面对面?
目的:本研究的目的是评估电子PBL教程,并将这些课程与面对面的PBL课程进行比较。患者和方法:本研究是一项采用定量方法的项目评估研究。在研究中,四 对2020年4月至6月期间举行的90分钟e-PBL课程进行了评估。在线进行的会议是使用sevenstep 以13-14名学生和一名导师为一组进行教学。用薄切片法对录像进行分析。此外,& # x0D;使用多种工具和材料分析评估的各种定量数据,包括项目结束评估 的形式。定量数据分析采用Friedman检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。 结果:通过对学生反馈的课程结构、内容和流程进行评价分析;对于电子教学,80%以上的学生给出了积极的评价。对于案例,学生们 在“学习和研究的动机”、“日常生活及其与个人的关系”方面,有超过80%的人持肯定态度;得到的支持、指导和反馈 在网上辅导期间,从导师那里获得的集体和个人的pbl显著高于面对面的PBL 教程(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marmara Medical Journal
Marmara Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Marmara Medical Journal, Marmara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi tarafından yılda üç kere yayımlanan multidisipliner bir dergidir. Bu dergide tıbbın tüm alanlarına ait orijinal araştırma makaleleri, olgu sunumları ve derlemeler İngilizce veya Türkçe olarak yer alır.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信