Development and Preliminary Validation of Administrative Support Using House’s Theoretical Framework

Jennifer H. Watson, Erik Drasgow, Jin Liu, Laura C. Chezan
{"title":"Development and Preliminary Validation of Administrative Support Using House’s Theoretical Framework","authors":"Jennifer H. Watson, Erik Drasgow, Jin Liu, Laura C. Chezan","doi":"10.3138/jehr-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers have demonstrated that administrative support represents a mitigating factor for teacher attrition and correlates with job satisfaction. The authors’ purpose in this study was to develop and validate the Dimensions of Administrative Support Inventory (DASI) scale to measure the support provided to teachers in school. They employed House’s theoretical framework to assess teachers’ support received from administrators across four domains: emotional support, appraisal support, instrumental support, and informational support. A total of 1,101 special and general education teachers in a southeastern state completed the scale. The authors used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to investigate the factor structure of the scale. They also tested measurement invariance through configural, metric, and scalar invariance tests to examine whether differences in construct measurement exist across special and general education teachers. Results indicated that a correlated two-factor model consisting of the Value and Logistics factors was the optimal solution. The latent mean difference testing showed that the two factors were similar across the two groups of teachers. The 26-item DASI scale provides administrators with a valid and reliable measure to quantify the support received by teachers and proactively implement changes to foster a supportive school environment, increase teachers’ job satisfaction, and reduce attrition.","PeriodicalId":269791,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Human Resources","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Human Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jehr-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have demonstrated that administrative support represents a mitigating factor for teacher attrition and correlates with job satisfaction. The authors’ purpose in this study was to develop and validate the Dimensions of Administrative Support Inventory (DASI) scale to measure the support provided to teachers in school. They employed House’s theoretical framework to assess teachers’ support received from administrators across four domains: emotional support, appraisal support, instrumental support, and informational support. A total of 1,101 special and general education teachers in a southeastern state completed the scale. The authors used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to investigate the factor structure of the scale. They also tested measurement invariance through configural, metric, and scalar invariance tests to examine whether differences in construct measurement exist across special and general education teachers. Results indicated that a correlated two-factor model consisting of the Value and Logistics factors was the optimal solution. The latent mean difference testing showed that the two factors were similar across the two groups of teachers. The 26-item DASI scale provides administrators with a valid and reliable measure to quantify the support received by teachers and proactively implement changes to foster a supportive school environment, increase teachers’ job satisfaction, and reduce attrition.
基于House理论框架的行政支持的发展与初步验证
研究人员已经证明,行政支持是教师流失的缓解因素,并与工作满意度相关。本研究的目的是开发并验证行政支持量表(DASI)的维度,以衡量学校为教师提供的支持。他们采用House的理论框架来评估教师从管理人员那里得到的四个方面的支持:情感支持、评价支持、工具支持和信息支持。东南部一个州共有1101名特殊教育和普通教育教师完成了这项调查。作者采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析对量表的因子结构进行了研究。他们还通过构形、度量和标量不变性测试测试了测量不变性,以检验特殊教育教师和普通教育教师在构建测量方面是否存在差异。结果表明,由价值因素和物流因素组成的相关双因素模型是最优解。潜均差检验表明,两组教师的这两个因素具有相似性。DASI量表包含26个条目,为管理者提供了一种有效可靠的方法来量化教师获得的支持,并主动实施变革,以营造支持性的学校环境,提高教师的工作满意度,减少人员流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信