A Comparative Study of R134a and Propane (R290) as Refrigerants in Heat Pump Water Heaters

Q4 Energy
Ann Lee, Shaokoon Cheng
{"title":"A Comparative Study of R134a and Propane (R290) as Refrigerants in Heat Pump Water Heaters","authors":"Ann Lee, Shaokoon Cheng","doi":"10.21926/jept.2303029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of decarbonization efforts, heat pump water heaters (HPWHs) offer an attractive solution over conventional electric resistance type hot water systems due to their 2-3 times higher efficiency. However, the high manufacturing costs and taxes associated with using hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerant make HPWHs expensive. As a means to tackle this issue, this paper explores the use of propane (R290) as a refrigerant in HPWHs. The study involves an experimental comparison of R290 and R134a, with refrigerant charges optimized for the unit at different ambient temperatures. This current work demonstrates that R290 achieves a 10% improvement in coefficient of performance (COP) at ambient temperatures beyond 20°C. However, at 10°C ambient temperature, the study shows that R290 offers no advantage over R134a, and the COP is lower. These results indicate that the compressor is the largest source of inefficiency, and this aligns well with experimental results on system performance. Additionally, simulation tests using compressors designed for R290 did not predict better COP values than the test unit. Overall, the study suggests that R290 is a viable refrigerant option for HPWHs, but further research is necessary to optimize it’s use.","PeriodicalId":53427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Power Generation Technology","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Power Generation Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/jept.2303029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of decarbonization efforts, heat pump water heaters (HPWHs) offer an attractive solution over conventional electric resistance type hot water systems due to their 2-3 times higher efficiency. However, the high manufacturing costs and taxes associated with using hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerant make HPWHs expensive. As a means to tackle this issue, this paper explores the use of propane (R290) as a refrigerant in HPWHs. The study involves an experimental comparison of R290 and R134a, with refrigerant charges optimized for the unit at different ambient temperatures. This current work demonstrates that R290 achieves a 10% improvement in coefficient of performance (COP) at ambient temperatures beyond 20°C. However, at 10°C ambient temperature, the study shows that R290 offers no advantage over R134a, and the COP is lower. These results indicate that the compressor is the largest source of inefficiency, and this aligns well with experimental results on system performance. Additionally, simulation tests using compressors designed for R290 did not predict better COP values than the test unit. Overall, the study suggests that R290 is a viable refrigerant option for HPWHs, but further research is necessary to optimize it’s use.
R134a与丙烷(R290)作为热泵热水器制冷剂的比较研究
在脱碳工作的背景下,热泵热水器(HPWHs)提供了比传统电阻型热水系统更有吸引力的解决方案,因为它们的效率高2-3倍。然而,使用氢氟碳化物(HFC)制冷剂的高昂制造成本和税收使得高温高温热泵价格昂贵。作为解决这一问题的手段,本文探讨了丙烷(R290)作为高温高压热水器制冷剂的使用。该研究包括R290和R134a的实验比较,并在不同的环境温度下对机组进行了制冷剂充注优化。目前的研究表明,R290在超过20°C的环境温度下,性能系数(COP)提高了10%。然而,在10°C的环境温度下,研究表明R290与R134a相比没有优势,COP更低。这些结果表明,压缩机是低效率的最大来源,这与系统性能的实验结果很好地吻合。此外,使用为R290设计的压缩机进行的模拟测试并没有预测出比测试单元更好的COP值。总体而言,该研究表明R290是HPWHs的可行制冷剂选择,但需要进一步研究以优化其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Power Generation Technology
Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Power Generation Technology Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信